Exactly! I have the same concern.
Tuesday, where are you?!?
How does Face ID work for people who wear burkas?
I'm curious to see how it will manage facial recognition for users wearing sometimes contact lenses and sometimes glasses (like me).
Another issue is, as someone already told in the past days, when your face is partially covered, like skiers. To be honest, TouchID is already a weak point with gloves in winter time.
Won't work. It would need to detect facial movements which FaceID will cover.
Are you seriously asking this question or trying to incite something here?
While you are at it, how about asking:
How does Face ID work for people whose faces are severely mutilated in fires and wars?
I truly doubt the spirit of your post.
There should be infrared light (not visible to human eyes) to illuminate the face on dark situations. As for people getting on board with this...... you surely mean the people who were not willing to scan their fingers and use the touch ID years ago (who also were willing to protest)? Sure, of course I get it.
There should be infrared light (not visible to human eyes) to illuminate the face on dark situations. As for people not getting on board with this...... you surely mean the people who were not willing to scan their fingers and use the touch ID years ago (who also were willing to protest)? Sure, of course I get it.
Do you whole heatedly think facial recognition to this degree is going to be secure?
Do you whole heatedly think facial recognition to this degree is going to be secure?
The information coming through in terms of how the system is expected to work suggests that, yes it will be that secure.
By making a 3D map of your face - hence why you need to rotate your head during set up - the system will be able to determine facial structure & check that the pre-determined number of points match. It’s not relying on eyes & it’s not recognising a picture of your face, it’s matching shape of your mouth, nose, cheeks etc.
Isn't that why they use an animation rather than the actual image for the setup?TBH I don't want to look at my own ugly face 1000x a day.
There's a reason I don't take selfies.
Do you whole heatedly think facial recognition to this degree is going to be secure?
So this guy in the video... He has a iPhoneX? How is he supposed to get a verified face?
No he doesn't have an iPhone X, no one outside of Apple has one yet. All of this that has been found is inside code of IOS 11 GM.
So, this GM can be run on a iPhone 7s and use FaceID?
The GM stands for Gold Master and it's IOS 11 code inside the code are features for the next iPhone's , the code was leaked early and some very clever people (from 9to5 Mac) have dug inside it and found features, the Face ID feature can't work on the iPhone 7 or anything other than the X because that's the only device that will have "Face ID" but this video shows the features that will work on the iPhone X.
So he fabricated this video?
What I mean is, If he is Using FaceID for real in the video... How could he without a iPhoneX and the correct sensors. So either it runs on a 7S or he has completely fabcricated the video so it LOOKS like how FaceID works..?!?
You should, there’s animation of fingerprint being scan to show whether the payment goes thru or not. People are making way too many obscure excuses to make Face ID a step back method. When I use Apple Pay sometimes it doesn’t go thru because of my sweaty fingers. Face ID should be a lot more convenient for me.
Apple is solving a problem that is *going* to exist.
Touch ID requires a prompt and an action by the user. That’s ok for today’s use. But future applications (such as augmented reality) will require constant authentication to ensure security. Frequently pestering you to verify who you are is neither practical, nor desirable.
Face ID will always know that you’re the authorized person to be using your phone and won’t have to keep asking you to verify that you are. Face ID is passive authentication. It doesn’t require your intervention, yet maintains constant security.
Apple is skating to where there puck will be. People who say that Touch ID is fine, aren’t thinking long term.
As for claiming that Face ID is less secure, it’s just the opposite. It significantly increases security. Touch ID unlocks a door, after which anybody can walk through and browse the supposedly secure room. Face ID on the other hand is a security guard who is constantly checking that the person inside the room is supposed to be there. It moves the security threshold from only having secure checkpoints to constant security.
That’s the difference between the people who work at Apple and the people who criticise Apple here.
The folks working tirelessly at Apple to implement these features will likely have thought of the same scenarios we have, but the difference is that they will then go on to come up with solutions to resolve those issues in one way or another. I too remember the crap storm this forum had when rumours of the 5s having a fingerprint sensor broke. TL; DR - none of the arguments held water.
Meanwhile, the critics here use these myriad of “what if” scenarios to anchor criticism and use them as proof of why something shouldn’t be done. It’s neither constructive nor productive.
I believe that come next week, Apple will answer all our concerns with regards to face ID and we will wonder how these conversations even happened in the first place.