I know it's just that everybody has been talking about this "slim" MB Pro.
The slimness stays with the Air not the Pro.
I am also still finding this '3rd' Macbook line thing hard to comprehend. I just don't see where it even fits in. It is a better air but a lesser pro? A better pro? (Macbook Pro PRO), a Macbook Retina?
Just seems...hard to believe.
Has anyone got any facts this all just rumour.
Has anyone got any facts this all just rumour.
Has anyone got any facts this all just rumour.
I'm finding it astonishing the amount of leaks and specs that have arisen before this event, especially after Cook specifically mentioned they would be doubling down on security. Although it's good for us rumour lovers and Apple fanboys, i question the security and administration functioning of Apple since Steve passed away.
Has anyone got any facts this all just rumour.
MBA 11.6/1.7/4/64FLASH-USA MBA 11.6/1.7/4/128FLASH-USA MD845LL/A MBAIR 11.6/2.0/8/256FLASH-USA
I just can't believe you can't choose from more graphics options on a Mac. If I want to use a computer for CUDA based computing, what do I do? By a PC, I guess...
Seeing that the Mac has some of its roots in nEXT, it's ironic you can't do GPU-based scientific computing on it.
I know Apple are doing well out of simplifying everything (including the available product line) but why can't you opt to pick a different GPU?
How is that hard to comprehend? Apple already had 3 lines of MacBook before. There were MacBook, MacBook Air, and MacBook Pro (and I picked MacBook, which is what I'm still using right now).
What leaks? All we have are vague part numbers, links to very obvious betas, and blatantly false claims (this one.)
There were a lot worse leaks when Jobs was alive. Remember when Time leaked the new iMac?
If Apple does do subpar with high prices and no redesign with the Mac Pro then they want people to not buy it. Then they can say next year they are dropping it because nobody buys it. I have seen them do this before with other Macs. It is in their DNA.
New Air info from 9to5mac:
Also, if E3 Xeons were used in the base configuration, then there'd be no possibility of a six-core BTO model without also swapping the motherboard and going to an E5-based solution. I can't imagine that Apple would even bother offering a Mac Pro with such low specs -- you'd be better off buying an iMac. Besides, the last-gen base model was available with a BTO 6-core chip, so this would be a major step backwards.
New Air info from 9to5mac: