Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
I know it's just that everybody has been talking about this "slim" MB Pro.

The slimness stays with the Air not the Pro.

The rumours are so convoluted, confused and contradictory that it's difficult to know what to believe any more.

I don't know if it's just a bunch of analysts and websites looking for web traffic and publicity or Apple doing this on purpose.
 
dzySv.png
 
I am also still finding this '3rd' Macbook line thing hard to comprehend. I just don't see where it even fits in. It is a better air but a lesser pro? A better pro? (Macbook Pro PRO), a Macbook Retina?

Just seems...hard to believe.

How is that hard to comprehend? Apple already had 3 lines of MacBook before. There were MacBook, MacBook Air, and MacBook Pro (and I picked MacBook, which is what I'm still using right now).
 
I'm finding it astonishing the amount of leaks and specs that have arisen before this event, especially after Cook specifically mentioned they would be doubling down on security. Although it's good for us rumour lovers and Apple fanboys, i question the security and administration functioning of Apple since Steve passed away.

Some or all of the leaks could be false trails designed to identify where the leaks are coming from. It would also cast doubt on the real leaks.
 
I just can't believe you can't choose from more graphics options on a Mac. If I want to use a computer for CUDA based computing, what do I do? By a PC, I guess...

Seeing that the Mac has some of its roots in nEXT, it's ironic you can't do GPU-based scientific computing on it.

I know Apple are doing well out of simplifying everything (including the available product line) but why can't you opt to pick a different GPU?

What stops you from doing scientific computing on the iMac? It was mostly Apple who created the OpenCL specification anyway.

And the reason why GPU options are limited are very simple: for many machines, the GPU cards are either soldered on-board (laptop) or are custom-made parts with custom firmware. Moreover, its Apple who writes most of the driver. Each option would increase the cost of the total package. Its not comparable to the PC world, where anyone can build a GPU and write a driver for it.
 
How is that hard to comprehend? Apple already had 3 lines of MacBook before. There were MacBook, MacBook Air, and MacBook Pro (and I picked MacBook, which is what I'm still using right now).

This were three different line. New line in existing line is just hard to believe.
Retina if eventually would come, can be just a bto upgrade.
Thats why and I dont believe in this "3rd macbook line". If I can calculate, dont see the retina coming at all. It will be a normal pretty much minor update, in terms of cpu, gpu, and some additional parts.
Sorry folks for being party breaker :)
 
What leaks? All we have are vague part numbers, links to very obvious betas, and blatantly false claims (this one.)

There were a lot worse leaks when Jobs was alive. Remember when Time leaked the new iMac?

I remember when 9to5 I think, leaked the advert for the new 3rd gen fatboy iPod nano, we all knew it was real as Apple issued a cease order to have the story removed. Those were the day's...
 
If Apple does do subpar with high prices and no redesign with the Mac Pro then they want people to not buy it. Then they can say next year they are dropping it because nobody buys it. I have seen them do this before with other Macs. It is in their DNA.

I for one hope they don't do a redesign of the MP. Now I do hope they at least give us 2012 processors and the like. :)
 
New Air info from 9to5mac:

Hi,

That 8GB/256GB on the 11" sounds great. I would prefer the 1.7GHz i5 over the 2.0GHz i7, though, as I was reading the i7 got a bit hot sometimes, which is something I really want to avoid on laptops. Laptops starting hot give up after a few years.


Peter.
 
Also, if E3 Xeons were used in the base configuration, then there'd be no possibility of a six-core BTO model without also swapping the motherboard and going to an E5-based solution. I can't imagine that Apple would even bother offering a Mac Pro with such low specs -- you'd be better off buying an iMac. Besides, the last-gen base model was available with a BTO 6-core chip, so this would be a major step backwards.

I'd love to have the E3-1290V2 as a BTO option to maximize single-threaded performance. (Show me an iMac with an Ivy Bridge processor turbo-clocked at 4.1 GHz that also has an easily replaceable graphics card and extra internal bays.)

But yeah, seems unlikely that Apple would add Socket H2 boards to their lineup.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.