Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
I think you misunderstand what USB-C is and what Thunderbolt 3 is. The one in Macbook's is not USB-C standard but Thunderbolt 3 using USB-C port.

The difference is the protocol used. The problem with USB-C protocol is that each manufacturer is allowed to not support all standard protocol for USB-C. Meaning, a laptop with USB-C protocol not (Thunderbolt 3) is not required to support all USB-C standard. For example there are laptops with USB-C port that are not Thunderbolt 3 and it does not support charging, video out or networking but it does support file transfer like USB-A. Thats why USB-C is broken in that concept because it's not like Thunderbolt 3 where once you use it, it is expected to support all those other features.

And I think thats the main reason why manufacturers are slow to adapt USB-C because there is no cost benefit in using the port. The problem is if supporting all USB-C feature is mandatory it will drive the cost for producing the port. For example a mid-tier phone using USB-C standard, if it is mandatory to support all features of USB-C it will drive the cost of the phone higher because those features needs different IC then drivers and etc.

Thats the reason why USB-C is not quite the port that will rule them all yet. For now most of USB-C ports (not Thunderbolt) functions the same with USB-A. Well, I have to admit USB-C connection is much stable compared to microUSB.

USB-C is the port to rule them all. The reason why all devices don’t have TB3 is because of cost. TB3 requires a controller for every 2 ports. But guess what? USB 4.0 will bring USB-C/TB3 to all very soon. Again Apple was ahead of the curve and this should increase the longevity of all of the TB3 Macs.
 
I'm an engineer and photographer - USB-A is the dominant port with C&C equipment, chemical processing equipment, and even in the medical field as well. So the 100k MRI machine you just bought needs to be trashed to get one with USB-C sure... Nope!

In photography our tools in the field are portable USB-A drives and SD cards. So I need to trash all of that and my cameras which use SD cards... Nope! By the way what camera has USB-C built in? None!

And don't push the Dongles & Hubs there more trouble than having the needed port onboard. A working pro's system needs the ports onboard.
[doublepost=1564406692][/doublepost]

Yes! Its still faster than WiFi and its private! In some environments Bluetooth and WiFi are just not possible or allowed.

The following cameras have USB-C built-in:

Nikon Z-7
Canon EOS R
Phase One XF IQ4
Fujifilm XT-3
Source: https://tethertalk.com/2018/09/07/why-are-new-cameras-featuring-a-usb-c-data-port/

BlackMagic Pocket Cinema 4K (2019) - https://www.blackmagicdesign.com/products/blackmagicpocketcinemacamera

Various Panasonic mirrorless cameras have a USB-C port, for at least charging. I hook up my FZ-2500 via a Micro-USB to USB-C cable...not getting USB-C's benefits, but it works.

I think you are resisting change because you're comfortable with your setup, which is fine, but change is coming regardless. After all, it is the one constant in life.
[doublepost=1564420770][/doublepost]
December 31, 2019 :p;)
[doublepost=1564419449][/doublepost]

I want my Zip and Jazz drives ;):p

Some guy hooked up a USB Zip drive to an iPad Pro running iPadOS and it mounted. Eject wasn’t available, but that’s a Radar submission. Search YouTube.
 
  • Like
Reactions: nwcs
Most buy Apple devices because they like macOS and iOS. Many don’t like their operating system hijacking their computer and upgrading itself whenever it wants to. Many like being able to walk in to a store to get support instead of spending hours on the phone with someone from India.

Sensing some xenophobia in your comment. Have any concrete evidence it is solely macOS and iOS as people jump ship to AndroidOS, ChromeOS, Linux OS or even WindowsOS. Hmm didn't iOS use to keep prompting one to upgrade, and I believe WindowsOS has changed this finally. MacOS also provides the option to delay install. Walking in the store to obtain an appointment or pre-booking one only to wait around for another 20-30 mins to be seen, and depending on how it goes it will ether take 30 mins to an hour to repair, get it replaced or wait for days for it to be shipped out for repair work. Support indeed :p;)
 
We are not perfectly fine but we have no option :)

like the butterfly keyboard...
like no physical ESC key...
like touchbar (all Macbook Pro are TB only)...
:)
I hate to say it, Macbook Pro are one of those devices who have the balls to call themselves pros but provide little options :)

Absolutely re: the keyboard and Touch Bar issues. But the ports complaints are silly.

(PS: keyboards suck, and the touchbar actually makes the machines worse if you are a touch typist - took me a year to stop accidentally brushing my fingers over the stupid thing)
 
USB-C is the port to rule them all. The reason why not all devices have TB3 is because of cost. But guess what? USB 4.0 will bring USB-C/TB3 to all very soon. Again Apple was ahead of the curve and this should increase the longevity of all of the TB3 Macs.

I think I've read somewhere that USB4 Standard is TB4 but once again it will be hard to swallow because it will drive the cost high for other devices. Like for example a printer, it will be pointless for it to use TB3 standard when its only task is to transfer data for printing and this is addressed by USB2 standard and the cost is very low. So with this, USB3 will be with us for a long time. Thunderbolt were design for desktop/laptop but not for peripherals. Imagine a mouse using Thunderbolt 3 :)

Maybe desktop/laptop/tablet/phones will be using Thunderbolt technology but not peripheral devices. It would be very funny for Arduino (very affordable MCU for almost anything) to use Thunderbolt because it wont become affordable anymore.

More and more devices will be changing to USB-C connection if the cost is lesser than USB-A connection. But like I said USB-A/USB3.0 will here to stay. I think the average lifetime of a Macbook is 5 years and within 5 years starting today lots of devices will still be using USB-A connection and thats one reason why you should still have a USB-A in Macbook Pro specially the laptop is for professional's who have different requirements and needs.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Peperino and DanBig
LOL. "Financial hit."

As for office projectors, my office provides all the necessary adapters in every conference room.

And why would I "brag" about buying macs? I buy them because they are the best machines for doing what I need done.

Why is it so hard for you to believe that most people who buy MBP's are perfectly fine dealing with all USB-C?

Are you gloating? yes, it seems the world revolves around you, all conferences rooms offer what you are accustomed to :rolleyes:

Best machines, hmm subjective. What you are doing, not sure never asked and maybe.

Ah yes another one of those in my world I use USB-C and everyone just has to deal with it, entitled much. :rolleyes::p
[doublepost=1564421146][/doublepost]
Me either

Not all users want a thermal throttled laptop either ;):p
 
I have a 2016 15" MacBook Pro and I simply purchased a USB 2.0 Type-B to USB-C cable for my Focusrite Scarlet 18i8 and it worked just fine. I started having issues and I immediately thought that it might be the cable, but come to find out that as Focusrite updated the Control software, they also updated the driver for the 18i8, and I needed to manually remove the FocusritePCIe.kext, which along with updating Focusrite Control to version 3.2.1, which got rid of the issues I was having. My point being is that I have zero USB-A ports on my MacBook Pro and I simply spent a few dollars on new cables that work exactly the same as the old USB-A cables. I hook up a WD Passport that came with a USB 3.0 Mini-B to USB-C cable for Time Machine and I use a Sandisk Extreme Portable with USB-C on both ends for external storage. I print wirelessly and I use Apple's Bluetooth keyboard, trackpad and mouse. I do have an adapter to charge them using the included USB-A to Lightning cable, but I also use my Lightning to USB-C cable to charge them directly off of the MacBook Pro. I wish Apple (Tim Cook) would pry open their wallet and put a Lightning to USB-C cable in the box, but then they wouldn't sell as many USB-C to USB-A dongles, so we know that won't happen.

I still would like Apple to add a USB-C 3.1 Gen 2 (10Gbps) port to each side of this 16" MacBook Pro and call it a day. If they want to fit some sort of MagSafe style recessed ring around those two ports to bring back MagSafe, so be it. But then they should be done. We're 4 years into the USB-C switch and I don't want to see any USB-A ports back on the MacBook Pro...ever.

Desktop machines can generally keep legacy ports, because the are not meant to be portable, have no battery life to manage and generally have a larger footprint. However, the mini traded off a dGPU to have 4 Thunderbolt ports and a 65w TDP CPU inside it. The iMac is big enough that USB-A is no big deal, but everything on the back of that box had to run through the PCH since the CPU has zero leftover PCIe lanes for CPU attached TB3 or PCIe SSD. It's a compromise. One of many Apple makes. Both MacBook Pros have compromises, but are still better able to adapt to the end user than the 2012-2015 MacBook Pros. I have zero need for HDMI, 1 or 10GbE or an SD Card, but I can add them easily if I want to do that. I would rather have the flexibility of those 4 Thunderbolt 3 ports any day than two TB2 ports and two USB 3 ports. Especially with the advent of eGPUs and PCIe expansion boxes that coupled along with 4-, 6- and 8-core CPUs make the MacBook Pro a much better desktop replacement for those that intend to use it that way. I would have to argue that if users are buying one with zero intention of ever moving it, they really should buy a Mac mini or an iMac instead of fussing about missing ports on the MacBook Pro.

We are talk about adding not substituting! Adding two more ports (USB-A) is not a big deal! Besides the CPU already has the connections natively (4)! You're not stealing any PCI lanes. Two for the ports and one for the SD card slot.

So having two more port holes in the case is going to kill you? Come on let's get real!

The aim from what has been leaked is a high end system not a mid or low tier system. Getting back the ports is what we need. Over 30 people have agreed with my original post.
 
Absolutely re: the keyboard and Touch Bar issues. But the ports complaints are silly.

(PS: keyboards suck, and the touchbar actually makes the machines worse if you are a touch typist - took me a year to stop accidentally brushing my fingers over the stupid thing)

Well I've gotten used to the keyboard but I might have a problem with TB. Still I might end up getting a Macbook Pro 15 because I need its mobility and computing power and like I said I don't have much an option unless I'm going Dell XPS 15 which has Windows not that Windows is a bad OS but I'm more into UNIX like system. Apple in this context is not giving me much when it comes to hardware choices.
 
Some guy hooked up a USB Zip drive to an iPad Pro running iPadOS and it mounted. Eject wasn’t available, but that’s a Radar submission. Search YouTube.

Interesting and I hope it is supported once iPadOS GM is released. :)
 
No professional presenters here, I see. HDMI is not sufficient, we need VGA port as well to cover all presenter situations. As one of my colleagues recently noted: "VGA is more reliable them HDMI". I agree, and reliability is key when it comes to presentations.

Strange that thin bezels is so desirable, it is just cosmetics and has very little function except a little bit more sceee are. It looks "modern" but so does a computer with small and few holes for ports.

A 16 inch MBP, seems odd to introduce without having some spectacular features. No-keyboards and ports are not spectacular.

I rather see that they took the old 17 inch, make a thin bezels XDR screen (18.5"? 4K), good thermals for "silent" operation or to maximise GPU and CPU. Add an optional downscaled afterburner card for the video editing crowd. Now that is worth paying 3000 USD for - starting price.

or...

Even more interesting would be a 2-1 where the keyboard and Touch Bar is replaced with a "side car-ed" iPad for completely other kinds of inputs such as simulated wheels, sliders, time lines, WACOM replacement and a software keyboard for the odd mail.

However, I would be surprised if Apple showed any courage to reinvent the laptop so we probably get a slightly larger screen and a new keyboard and nothing else. How boring!
 
Pricing will probably start where the 15” model’s ends.
I think that wouldn't be all that bad, but I'm really looking forward to seeing 13 inch Macbook Pro being given the same treatment.
Also windows laptops are scary expensive these days so apple charge doesn't seem all that bad to be honest.
 

Attachments

  • 71A89405-0A49-4FDD-8ED2-BE653CDB4F2E.png
    71A89405-0A49-4FDD-8ED2-BE653CDB4F2E.png
    321.9 KB · Views: 90
Its the more used interface even today! So your wired keyboard or mouse has a USB-C connection? Nope! Your 20 or so USB hard drives have hardwired USB-C Nope!

And don't drop the dongle bomb NO!

Real working Pro's don't want Dongles, Hubs or wacky cable solutions even today! And not likely for the next 10 of so years! I tried it and it was a mess!
[doublepost=1564405160][/doublepost]

Because its a needless dongle!

Stick this and the end of your cable. Problem solved.

https://www.amazon.com/nonda-Adapter-Thunderbolt-Aluminum-Indicator/dp/B015Z7XE0A

What a hassle, uh? People like to complain for everything.
 
As an Amazon Associate, MacRumors earns a commission from qualifying purchases made through links in this post.
So Apple expects its sheep customers to dish out yet another $3,000 to fix the design problems with current generation models? Attention sheep customers... instead of flushing $3,000 down the toilet, invest that $3,000 APPL or TSLA stock and you'll have a free MacBook Pro next year.
 
I think I've read somewhere that USB4 Standard is TB4 but once again it will be hard to swallow because it will drive the cost high for other devices. Like for example a printer, it will be pointless for it to use TB3 standard when its only task is to transfer data for printing and this is addressed by USB2 standard and the cost is very low. So with this, USB3 will be with us for a long time. Thunderbolt were design for desktop/laptop but not for peripherals. Imagine a mouse using Thunderbolt 3 :)

Maybe desktop/laptop/tablet/phones will be using Thunderbolt technology but not peripheral devices. It would be very funny for Arduino (very affordable MCU for almost anything) to use Thunderbolt because it wont become affordable anymore.

More and more devices will be changing to USB-C connection if the cost is lesser than USB-A connection. But like I said USB-A/USB3.0 will here to stay. I think the average lifetime of a Macbook is 5 years and within 5 years starting today lots of devices will still be using USB-A connection and thats one reason why you should still have a USB-A in Macbook Pro specially the laptop is for professional's who have different requirements and needs.

Huh? I think you’re confused. USB is backwards compatible! The only difference here is the port! Some USB 4.0 peripherals will take advantage of high bandwidth and others won’t. Are all peripherals 10 Gbps because USB 3.1 gen 2 is?

Professionals are much more likely to embrace better tech than consumers. If you work with video and aren’t taking advantage of TB3 then I don’t know what kind of professional you are!
 
Why in gods name do you need USBA at this point?

Because even though you might have all USB C devices, other people you work with may not. Printers at work, flash drives people give you, two factor authentication keys and so on. Microphones as well, for example the Blue Nano that I use from amazon has a USB to mini USB cable inside the box.

I would have one USB A and three USB C instead of the current four USB C ports.
 
I will buy the second gen version of this 100%.

Second gen should be around when? May 2020?
 
We are talk about adding not substituting! Adding two more ports (USB-A) is not a big deal! Besides the CPU already has the connections natively (4)! You're not stealing any PCI lanes. Two for the ports and one for the SD card slot.

So having two more port holes in the case is going to kill you? Come on let's get real!

The aim from what has been leaked is a high end system not a mid or low tier system. Getting back the ports is what we need. Over 30 people have agreed with my original post.

Sure, two more USB 3.1 Gen 2 ports would be great, even though I am not fond of odd numbers. One on either side that would be handled by the PCH, which would be very helpful...but “no more USB-A ports on any MacBook, Air or Pro. If Apple doesn’t get rid don’t mind two more port holes on a MacBook, but I don’t want them wasted on USB-A. Sure SDXC isn’t the end of the world, so they can add that, and move the headphone jack to the left side. No MagSafe, no Ethernet, no HDMI...all those can be handled via adapters/cables.
 
I think you misunderstand what USB-C is and what Thunderbolt 3 is. The one in Macbook's is not USB-C standard but Thunderbolt 3 using USB-C...

You are correct with all of that, but I understood it already. I was just counting on everyone to stay within the context of the discussion as it related to upcoming Macs. No worries.

Likewise, I expect the people dragging their feet on Thunderbolt 3 in a USB-C connector would prefer their USB standard to be >1.0, even though they’re only saying “USB-A.”
 
Because even though you might have all USB C devices, other people you work with may not. Printers at work, flash drives people give you, two factor authentication keys and so on. Microphones as well, for example the Blue Nano that I use from amazon has a USB to mini USB cable inside the box.

I would have one USB A and three USB C instead of the current four USB C ports.

Buy a USB-C to USB-Micro cable for your Blue Nano and you’re done. They are about $8.00 at Amazon. I have one for my digital camera. A dongle handled the rest.
 
I have a MacBook Pro that has a swelling battery problem to where I can't use the trackpad and it almost doesn't close. I'd like to replace it soon™ and this looks like a proper candidate for me to purchase if it does release.
 
Anyone else worried that they might do something stupid like put a FaceID camera with a notch, or remove all ports, or something like that? :eek:
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.