Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
My Nikon Z6 has USBC built in (so do the latest Sony models - not sure about Canon). It also uses an XQD card which I have trouble fitting into an SD slot. Should I use a dongle to make that connection?

Yes, the Music hardware industry is notoriously backwards. I blame the love of vacuum tubes. It doesn't mean I want a MacBook with a CRT.

If you want the fastest best connection today, that is USBC. When you go to get those gigabytes of 50MP images off your camera, it is faster. When you want to download the 8K video, it is faster.

You don't have to throw out a 100K MRI machine, you just plug it into the hub/dock just like you used to do because no laptop ever made has enough ports for anyone with a fair number of peripherals.

And eventually, it will all be wireless, just like the printers where people like you fought tooth and nail to cling to that damnable parallel port.

Hospitals require wired solutions as the RF noise messes up the monitoring gear.
 
I was having the same issues with my macbook, then I installed Visual Studio Code for Mac and run all my development directly on my Mac. Never looked back to a Win VM again. VS Code runs with only 80+ MB RAM and installs in 380+ MB of space. Fast to load, debug, etc. Won't use full version of VS again until they make for improvements.

Unfortunately, VSCode for Mac won't work for the projects I'm developing (some are legacy projects). Wish it did! But it wasn't just VStudio, other things caused the machine to cook (even doing batch processing in LightRoom).
 
My Olympus gear only offers mini USB, I stand corrected! I just don't monitor other camera systems that much.

The OM-D E-M1 Mark II and E-M1X have moved to USB-C, but the OM-D E-M5 Mark II and E-M10 Mark III have not (proprietary and Micro-B, respectively), so it looks like Olympus is in the middle of their transition to USB-C.

The E-M1 MII and E-M1X have also moved to SuperSpeed USB 3.0. I expect that within the next 2-3 years all the major brands will move over to USB-C as they introduce new DSLRs.

A simple USB-C to USB Micro-B cable for $8.00 would take care of you being able to connect to a newer 2016-2019 MacBook Pro, should you decide to move on from your current 2015 MacBook Pro. Good luck!
 
Yes, but since 2016 over three years have passed and those cables /adapters etc, if new then, are worn and at the end of 'service life' now. Sure, these things can hang on for many years yet, but the thriving accessory ecosystem / market shows people buying every few years. So, anything since 2016 needed to be bought, if bought with USB-A is a short sighted decision (in my books). They became 'an old port' the second C started coming on all new devices. Even the cheapest PCs now have one thrown in. Tl;dr: They don't last forever, when replacing buy C or it's your fault they don't fit your new tech (since it's now 2019, a long time since the move in 2016).

When peoples well used A peripherals reach the end of their service life (and are recycled - saved upsetting the eco guys), buy new modern ones! That means Type-C ;-) No waste needed. To take it to extremes... thicker chassis on machines with A rips more new metal from the ground, bad for earth?! (weak argument there though)

Yeah, they still work. Your WiFi would still work if a floppy drive was still fitted to your laptop too, only difference is it'd be an inch thick. In 2019, love it or hate it, millimetres matter. Type C only to Type C plus Type A is a few mm thicker, we all know Apple won't give in to that... not for a legacy port like Type A.

I mean, whichever side of the debate you're on, don't forget the large amount of people who are happy to move on to Type-C (the standard) and ditch Type-A (the legacy). It's the case with the current MBP, and it'll be no different on the next model, which will take us right into 2023.. I'm saying the benefits of the nice sleek, light, thin MB's at the minute are apparent every time I use it, whereas the lack of Type-A these days seldom bothers me once in a fortnight. Only when I find something on an old Type A drive or something, but then that's my fault for not migrating it over to a modern location.

Yes, these are my use case scenarios, not everyones.. That's the point of my post. Your 'bring back TypeA' use cases aren't everyone's either. Backed by phenomenal sales of Type C only devices..
[doublepost=1564428818][/doublepost]

Show me your numbers on that? Other than a very vocal, captive (relatively small) audience on here, which other significant group demands Type A back?

USB-C is the standard in 2019. If you're happy to save money and buy an external hard drive with say Type A only, then don't misinterpret that as C not being the standard. Those accessories are widely sold now in stores in the UK and US, no longer 'niche' and not over priced as initially they were.

The connector wasn't designed by Apple, but Intel. It's thin because devices now are thin. It's superior to Type A physically and technically in every way. I'm no expert, and neither are you, but the experts wouldn't have rushed the connector design. I don't see it having any issues Type A didn't have.. what are they in your opinion?

Yes, everything Apple does is constantly mocked as 'worst' etc as you've done yourself, and yet, if that were true (and EVERY Apple decision since Tim Cook) was truly disastrous, why would they be one of the most profitable, successful and admired companies in the world? ... ~unjustified hate, called out, and backed up..

And USB C solves the biggest problems of USB A.
1. It is reversible. You can't try to plug it in upside down.
2. It can deliver enough power that you don't normally need wall warts.
3. Its faster (though this probably could have made it into USB A)
 
  • Like
Reactions: 0989382
There's literally BILLIONS of USB-A devices still in use. What we didn't need was Apple being a dick nickel & diming customers for adapters. Seems you & 40+ others like being dicked by Apple.
I bet your main Windows laptop still has a VGA port on it as well, so...happy hunting. Eventually, Dell or Lenovo is going to do the same thing to a laptop you might really want and they will be d***s too, right? Technology advances, but feel free to keep the parallel port fires burning at night.
 
People really still want a giant Ethernet port on their laptops? What's wrong with a USB to ethernet adapter?
I'd like an Ethernet port. I don't expect to get it, but I'd like it. I have occasional use for it, and frequently that's at the end of a long cable. The RJ45 connector is much better for hanging a long cable off of than the USB-C connector is - more of the connector goes into the socket, and it latches in place - the physical interface is more secure. It's a situation where the Ethernet dongle causes strain on the USB-C port, where an actual Ethernet jack on the machine just shrugs off the stress of the Ethernet cable hanging down from the machine.

So that's what's wrong with the USB to Ethernet adapter. Yes, it's not a situation everyone faces, but there is a legit case for it. Most of the other adapters/dongles don't bother me as much. Missing Ethernet bothers me. Having a single USB-A port (in addition to a bunch of USB-C ports) for flash drives and various legacy devices, would be handy too.

Beyond that, give me back a physical Esc key (don't care about the rest of the function keys, but I use Esc thousands of times a day and need to be able to touch-type it), and I'd like MagSafe back - it's a superior interface for power in day-to-day life, prevents various cord-pulling problems and is dead simple to connect. Let the machine accept power via any of the USB-C ports as well, but have the MagSafe port there as a dedicated way to supply power.
 
If you are looking to control all UI/UX elements on present macOS then the experience can be limiting as it is not designed for Touch input, that does not mean that when one looks at a video to play/pause or to zoom in and out of images for example it is not a good idea to have a TouchScreen.

The UI design is the inherent limitation to a touch screen mac, since all you really can do is press buttons and scroll. I get you would like that, but I find it just as easy to use the touchpad.

Finger prints on the display is due to glass, one way around it to have a Nano anti-reflective coating on it and it would be resolved. When Apple moved the MBP lineup to glass without offering anti-glare options was the day fingerprints became a problem regardless if it was a TouchScreen or not.

Except most people do not touch the screen as much without a touchscreen, and I like glass as is not cut down by an additional layer of complexity and cost. Again, personal preference.

Besides when the brightness or display is ON it is less visible and I hear no complaints from people using iPhones and iPad, so you point really is overblown.

Actually, the iPad is a good example of what a touchscreen mac is not a good idea. People don't complain because of the iPad's design. The iPad OS is designed to be touch operated, with many features that make it useable such as scroll wheels for data input, that would not translate well to the Mac. However, the pencil is required for finer work and even then beyond drawing is not a very good tool for say creating a PowerPoint slide.

Bolting on a touch screen on an UI not designed for touch would just add complexity and cost for very little added usability; if you want touch controls, Apple could, and IMHO should, design the touchbar to better take advantage of things such as buttons, etc by making it more customizable.
 
I'm willing to bet Apple will NOT backpedal on USB-C. It's one port to rule them all.

Granted, in 2016 this was too early but the industry is quickly catching up and adapter cables are ubiquitous and cheap now.

What I wish they DID backpedal on (aside from the keyboards, obviously) is on soldering the SSD instead of using an M2 connector. The cost of upgrading storage is absolute BS.

But I'm not holding my breath.

Also, I hope they use LCD instead of burn-in prone OLED.
 
Last edited:
Why is it so hard for you to believe that most people who buy MBP's are perfectly fine dealing with all USB-C?

This is the internet, bringing the fine art of measurebation and arguing useless point sinto the digital age...
 
Tim Cook is currently rolling dice down the levitating hallway at Apple HQ to randomly decide on the pricing
 
I'm willing to bet Apple will NOT backpedal on USB-C. It's one port to rule them all.

Granted, in 2016 this was to early but the industry is quickly catching up and adapter cables are ubiquitous and cheap now.

What I wish they DID backpedal on (aside from the keyboards, obviously) is on soldering the SSD instead of using an M2 connector. The cost of upgrading storage is absolute BS.

But I'm not holding my breath.

Also, I hope they use LCD instead of burn-in prone OLED.

USB-C is here to stay...other than captive cables, replacement cable exist, are high quality and are inexpensive.

I don't expect them to backpedal on soldered SSD, but I would be happy if they simply made it removable as they have for the MacPro, iMac Pro, nTB 13" MacBook Pro and either licensed or sold upgrades for the end user. Apple will never embrace m.2 as there are high quality sticks, low quality sticks and everything in-between. They aren't going to leave money on the table. I cannot blame them for that. They know even reasonably priced upgrades won't ensure that people purchase Apple's upgrades as one man's bargain is another man's luxury.

I can agree with you on no OLED...don't want it, don't need the hassle or expense.
 
I still would like Apple to add a USB-C 3.1 Gen 2 (10Gbps) port to each side of this 16" MacBook Pro and call it a day. If they want to fit some sort of MagSafe style recessed ring around those two ports to bring back MagSafe, so be it.

More ports would certainly go a long way to alleviating the problem (esp. if they could ripple it down to the whole range, so the entry-level MBPs weren't stuck with only two holes to serve everything.

Adding a magnet to a USB-C port doesn't turn it into Magsafe if the plug still has to be pushed into the socket - Magsafe used spring-loaded 'surface mounted' terminals. Actually, TB3 has the opposite problem - its a bit too easy to 'improperly dismount' your 10TB RAID array by moving the computer a bit and it really needs some sort of latch.

Especially with the advent of eGPUs and PCIe expansion boxes that coupled along with 4-, 6- and 8-core CPUs make the MacBook Pro a much better desktop replacement for those that intend to use it that way. I would have to argue that if users are buying one with zero intention of ever moving it, they really should buy a Mac mini or an iMac instead of fussing about missing ports on the MacBook Pro.

Calling something a 'desktop replacement' laptop doesn't mean it has to be bolted to one desk - the important point is that its a laptop powerful and versatile enough to do your day job on and still be portable. A common scenario might be a daily shuttle between home and office, or between multiple workplaces, and occasional trips elsewhere - but it needs to do the job when it gets there preferably without any more boxes than you actually need - no point for it to be 3mm thinner and 200g lighter if that means you've got extra boxes to pack up every morning and evening. When the 2016 MBP came out, I was using a 17" MBP which was all I needed to carry, because I had displays/keyboards/mice at home and work and spare magsafes - to get the same experience with the 2016 I'd have needed to spend around £500 (I counted it - twice - it'd be a bit cheaper in 2019 I suppose) on hubs and dongles to get the same experience.

That's why I don't get the point of eGPUs/PCIe boxes by the way - if you need one to do your work then your laptop is effectively chained to the desk so you might have well have a desktop with everything built in and neatly tucked under the desk. They're a solution to a problem that Apple have created by not selling a regular PCIe desktop.
 
I'm just curious where they will put the camera given the ultra thin bezels. I don't think I'd like an "invisible" camera hidden behind the display as I don't trust a camera I can't cover / unplug when I'm not using it.
 
The UI design is the inherent limitation to a touch screen mac, since all you really can do is press buttons and scroll. I get you would like that, but I find it just as easy to use the touchpad.

TrackPad is a good option, however why would Apple introduced TouchBar which seems like a half-baked concept. It basically wants to be a TrackPad and TouchDisplay at the same time while failing to do either better. It has no tactile feedback like the TrackPad and no frame of reference like a TouchDisplay. Even a HUD is more useful as it display the needed information in-front like AR would.


Except most people do not touch the screen as much without a touchscreen, and I like glass as is not cut down by an additional layer of complexity and cost. Again, personal preference.

I have yet to hear any complaints of fingerprints on iPad's or iPhones that has distracted from any tasks and it has been over a decade. I would prefer a matte coated glass display like the XDR, however here is hoping. After using a touchscreen device like an iPhone or iPad, one has a tendency to reach for UI/UX elements display on screen. I myself at times have this reaction to reach out for buttons or scroll on my MBP.


Actually, the iPad is a good example of what a touchscreen mac is not a good idea. People don't complain because of the iPad's design. The iPad OS is designed to be touch operated, with many features that make it useable such as scroll wheels for data input, that would not translate well to the Mac. However, the pencil is required for finer work and even then beyond drawing is not a very good tool for say creating a PowerPoint slide.

Bolting on a touch screen on an UI not designed for touch would just add complexity and cost for very little added usability; if you want touch controls, Apple could, and IMHO should, design the touchbar to better take advantage of things such as buttons, etc by making it more customizable.

Oddly enough iPadOS even brings user selectable scrollbar, this should be a good indicator that anything is possible with Apple if they put their collective minds to it. Before iPad Pro and ApplePencil there was Wacom that allowed for finer input via stylus on a pressure sensitive mat, we also had high DPI mouse, mouse nubs and TrackPad. Even iPads permit triple input usage in iPadOS with finger, pencil and mouse (via accessibility). Then there is also AirGestures that can be a forth option. Why limit macOS to only the keyboard, TrackPad, mouse and Wacom, let have a touchscreen so the UI/UX can evolve.
[doublepost=1564434316][/doublepost]
I'm just curious where they will put the camera given the ultra thin bezels. I don't think I'd like an "invisible" camera hidden behind the display as I don't trust a camera I can't cover / unplug when I'm not using it.

More complex camera's have been in thinner bezels and displays devices such as iPhone and iPad Pro 2018, why do people believe this is an impossible thing.
 
You're kidding, right? My medical practice plans on buying a handful of the new displays & stands at launch. Just because you can't afford it doesn't mean no one else can.

Oh don’t worry, I can afford those. I probably make double what you make. It’s just that only a complete idiot would by them.
[doublepost=1564434482][/doublepost]
You are not their target market. Those who are could care less about the price if it delivers.

So they could care less, huh?
 
The 'need USB A or I won't buy it' is the perfect modern example of petty/difficult for petty/difficult sake.

This happened with the Apple serial port, it happened with RGB cables in home theater, it went on _forever_ with the PC PS2 port … hell, it happened with the UHF/VHF/FM connector.

There is always a 'next' …

The absolute trivial minority is, once again, demanding *everyone* allow for their own resistant sensibilities.

In this case there is a direct solution as opposed to a dead end … but it is never enough, it seems.
 
So, “Pros” don’t want a port with 40Gb/s throughput capable of:

- charging laptop
- converting to any legacy port
- daisy-changing
- driving external displays
- supporting audio
- all of the above simultaneously

And instead want a USB-A port capable of ... USB A?

Here’s the thing. If Apple decide what ports to have, somebody will be pissed. USB-A? Why not HDMI? DVI? MiniDisplay? Ethernet? Line In? FireWire?

You’ve got a port that can literally be any other port you need. What’s the issue? A $4 converter?
Where were you able to find Apple approved adapters for $4? All the adapters on the Apple website are $19 and up.
 
And USB C solves the biggest problems of USB A.
1. It is reversible. You can't try to plug it in upside down.
2. It can deliver enough power that you don't normally need wall warts.
3. Its faster (though this probably could have made it into USB A)
The reversibility is a giant advantage? If so an analog phono port has 360 continuous degrees of freedom how you plug it in vs just two discrete orientations. Maybe Apple should start using them given the big problem it is to plug in stuff.
 
The reversibility is a giant advantage? If so an analog phono port has 360 continuous degrees of freedom how you plug it in vs just two discrete orientations. Maybe Apple should start using them given the big problem it is to plug in stuff.
Round connector would be nice. Maybe USB-D.
 
Just give us the dam ports back!
  • 2 - USB-A
  • 4 - USB-C
  • Rear USB-C ports (L&R) recessed to accept flush MagSafe Plug & cable with charge LED
  • Ethernet & SD Slot

Keep Dreaming Brother, Keep Dreaming. We will be lucky if this thing comes with ports at all. Someone probably decided it needed to be completely wireless.
 
Oh don’t worry, I can afford those. I probably make double what you make. It’s just that only a complete idiot would by them.
[doublepost=1564434482][/doublepost]

I could understand them being of special value to a radiologist who would benefit from the best resolution obtainable but for just general medical office use it would be unnecessary.
 
Ughhh, I literally just bought the updated 15' MacBook less then two months ago, but depending on how much I'll get to trade this in, I'll definitely be updating to the 16 inch lol.
 
Hospitals require wired solutions as the RF noise messes up the monitoring gear.
Oh please... there's equipment that's sensitive to RF noise, usually in shielded rooms. Guess what, that equipment is also sensitive to other equipment, so wired or not, no other equipment allowed in that room. Almost 20 years ago, we started using wireless equipment in the form of laptops, later iPhones and then iPad all over the hospital, wifi and bluetooth. It doesn't matter. We've been in touch with manufacturers of equipment and all normal equipment that doesn't require a shielded room to operate in is not affected by wifi, bluetooth, etc. However, there was a single infusion pump manufactured by Braun that would malfunction when using a cell phone right next to it. That specific model was manufactured in the 1980s, so somewhat of a relict. Monitoring equipment as used in the ICU or during surgery is absolutely not affected by any consumer type wireless technology unless you turn the power so far up that you should be worried about a brain tumor. Larger wifi antennas to transmit data several miles are usually placed on top of buildings, again in a way that no equipment is affected. You'll also find warning signs on the doors leading to the rooftop with a approx. time it's safe to stay there.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.