I'm going to venture out a guess and say that this new iPhone will be compatible with AT&T's new HSPA 7.2, and save 4G for the next one...
I doubt the iPhone will have batteries the size of those in the iPad![]()
Since the iPad has 256MB memory I'd be amazed if the next iPhone had any more -- clearly that's what Apple currently believe is the sweet spot in terms of price/performance. They don't like putting costly parts in their products unless it is absolutely necessary.
I have an iPad and the biggest issue with only 256MB of RAM is that Safari is constantly reloading old pages when you open new ones. Since the iPhone OS has no virtual memory system, all open windows in Safari have to remain in RAM. So as you open new windows, it has to dump the contents of older windows from RAM, meaning that when you return to those windows it has to reload them, which is time consuming and also removes anything you have typed in on that page, like for example replying to a thread here. Sometimes I can only have 2 windows open, sometimes 5. It depends on how big the websites are as well as how long the OS has been up and how much RAM it is using for the system. I believe there is a memory leak somewhere in the OS because when I first boot it up I can have a lot more windows open in Safari than if I try the same websites after using the iPad on and off for a few days. Also using a utility like "iPad Info" you can see the amount of free RAM decrease over time.
The iPhone OS desperately needs a virtual memory system so that Safari pages can be paged out to disk, especially with such little RAM. More RAM would be welcome as well. This is my single greatest complaint with the iPad, the second being a lack of tabs (which can be fixed with a 3rd party browser like Atomic Browser".
The human eye can resolve much more detail than 329 ppi but it really depends on how how well lit, how far away, etc. For the purposes of this discussion, 300+ ppi on such a small screen close up might be overkill but it really depends on your source material.960x640 on a 3.5" translates to 329 PPI. Since a human eye in mint condition is unable to differentiate detail beyond 300 PPI, it sounds like overkill, literally.
If the memory being 512 is true, that's great news for the new iPhone. Bad news for current iPad owners.
Ah, the old "in order to qualify for criticizing something your knowledge must be equal or superior to that of its creator" argument. I remember it from grade school. Sorry, but you don't have to be Pavarotti to know that Mrs. Miller was a horrible singer. All you need is to not be completely tone deaf.
If you have eyes and a brain you'll know that increased graphics performance comes at the cost of more power consumption and more heat. I'm sure the A4 is perfectly capable of smooth performance at 960x640 resolution, since it's already proven to handle 1024x768 well, but the iPhone doesn't have the iPad's battery.
960x640 on a 3.5" translates to 329 PPI. Since a human eye in mint condition is unable to differentiate detail beyond 300 PPI, it sounds like overkill, literally.
The same engineers who designed the original iPhone 3G? Yeah, those guys built a phone with sluggish graphics and a weak battery, so excuse me for not trusting them this time.
One reason I've always avoided PowerBooks/MacBooks like the plague is the ridiculously low screen resolution. There's just never enough pixels for all the stuff I need on my workspace and I'm not a big fan of ceaseless X/Y scrolling and resizing.
Currently I'm on a Dell notebook with a 15.4" screen and 1680x1050. It's acceptable, but I should have gone with their 1920x1200/15.4".
Apple must have some kind of ppi hangup, because their 15.4" only has 1440x900 (beyond useless) and the 17" has 1680x1050 (OK-ish, but a complete waste of a 17" screen which should have 1920x1200 at the very least).
Now that they've introduced the iPhone with 160 ppi and there are rumors of new icon sizes up to 512x512, might there be any hope that Apple will finally abandon this whole "Xtra Large pixels for the half blind" type deal and introduce higher res screens on the MacBooks?
Oh, totally.
Hmm. I don't see a lot of reports about the 9C98 being yellowish though. I googled and a couple of comments about a bluish tint (like the one I observed) came up. I wouldn't be surprised if there's some variation, I mean... it's Apple. Cheap crap components inside a deceptively luxurious exterior.
I think this is false rumor that has taken on a life of it's own. It makes no sense to me. The DPI is already high enough and outright doubling it offers negligible benefit except in spec-sheet wars (that Apple never bothers trying to win).
I know we will hear from those with super vision that really need this resolution... You are the Exception.
Downsides are quadrupling of the TFT active transistors (increased cost/power draw), possible scaling issues. Another resolution to target.
IMO many downsides, negligible benefit. Unlikely to happen.
I am clinging on to that 512 MB thread of hope.
If all the hardware rumors are true, plus it'll have 512 MB, the new iPhone will basically catch up to premium top shelf hardware phones currently available. That plus the sleek and efficient iPhone OS 4.0 with all the new features (and I'm sure a few yet-to-be announced), I see it becoming a fact that the new iPhone will be the best phone available on the market.
The only competitor will be the evo for it's 4G and the other random nerd friendly features.
I doubt the iPhone will have batteries the size of those in the iPad![]()
All right! Larger screen resolutionThe downside is that apps will have to scale and developers will have to support yet another screen resolution. I guess Apple will not change the physical screen size since the old and new resolutions have the same aspect ratio.
So how many displays are developers going to have to account for? And what about pricing? Something like:
$.99 for iPhone
$2.99 for iPhone 4G
$4.99 for iPad
I hope not.....![]()
This is a wonderful rumor, I hope it′s true. Remember that this iPhone will probably be THE iPhone until summer 2011, so it has to be excellent. There is competition with other phones that are being made.
iPhone needs a higher resolution screen, because now it is one it has some of the lowest res screen in the smartphone market. And I want to see pictures better, zoom more and see more. Now you can see pixels..I am looking forward to this update the most.
512MB RAM would be great. This iPhone will have to be great at multitasking and be able to handle OS 5.0 next year. With bigger resolution, maybe some larger apps, multitasking in various apps ( few websites opened, mail, phone, ichat/skype, opened mail attachments in 3rd party apps..) 512 MB is a wise idea. I am sure the next iPad will have that upgrade as well..
Bring it on! 3 weeks until the announcement, I hope all the rumors will come true. If yes, this iPhone will have as much or even more success as it has had until now.
(I am going to freeze myself, so I don′t have to wait until the release. Someone please unfreeze me on launch day)![]()
No, the iPad can't make phone calls.
Touché.Nor can the iPhone in many instances.
haha! I had thought I'd seen the last of RoundRects, but no!I think everyone is missing the point... Seams, resolution .... whatever.
This really is all part of a larger crusade by Steve Jobs that began 30 years ago. You see, after watching 2001: A Space Odyssey while on one of his LSD trips, Steve had a revelation. He tried to share this revelation, but was miffed at Bill Atkinson that he did not truly appreciate the geometric perfection of the ROUND RECTANGLE.
It may have taken three decades, but the iPhone 4G is the culmination of billions of dollars in sales, R&D, man hours... prior models have had strange case backs, ugly bevels, the antithesis of perfect lines and curves...
But at long last, at WWDC 2010, Steve (read: THE STARCHILD) will unleash upon the world the Swiss Army Knife of ROUND RECTANGLES...
![]()
2010 is THE YEAR WE MAKE CONTACT and iPhone 4G (Cue "Also Sprach Zarathustra" by Strauss...) is your new obsidian god of rounded corners with perfect radii.
![]()
I wasn't referring to the A4 chip since that is a known item anyhow, sorry I didn't make that clear.The large batteries are needed to power the larger screen not the A4 chip. The A4 by all reports is very efficient. Driving a screen with more pixels won't change that.
Since the iPad has 256MB memory I'd be amazed if the next iPhone had any more -- clearly that's what Apple currently believe is the sweet spot in terms of price/performance. They don't like putting costly parts in their products unless it is absolutely necessary.
Touché.
Which is why I won't buy an AT&T iPhone (zero reception at home). I hope Apple expands carriers to include T-Mobile USA.![]()
I just view a higher resolution as an improved feature of an ebook reader.![]()
I think everyone is missing the point... Seams, resolution .... whatever.
This really is all part of a larger crusade by Steve Jobs that began 30 years ago. You see, after watching 2001: A Space Odyssey while on one of his LSD trips, Steve had a revelation. He tried to share this revelation, but was miffed at Bill Atkinson that he did not truly appreciate the geometric perfection of the ROUND RECTANGLE.
It may have taken three decades, but the iPhone 4G is the culmination of billions of dollars in sales, R&D, man hours... prior models have had strange case backs, ugly bevels, the antithesis of perfect lines and curves...
But at long last, at WWDC 2010, Steve (read: THE STARCHILD) will unleash upon the world the Swiss Army Knife of ROUND RECTANGLES...
2010 is THE YEAR WE MAKE CONTACT and iPhone 4G (Cue "Also Sprach Zarathustra" by Strauss...) is your new obsidian god of rounded corners with perfect radii.
![]()
I wasn't referring to the A4 chip since that is a known item anyhow, sorry I didn't make that clear.
So driving and processing four times as many display pixels comes for free? I doubt it.
Even if this were so, 960x640 @ 330 PPI? I doubt it.
The problem is that T-Mobile USA uses an odd frequency (1700MHz) for 3G data services. The current iPhone does not support this frequency, so T-Mobile USA customers using unlocked iPhones only have access to the pokey EDGE data service. GSM voice service on T-Mobile works fine apparently.Why not just buy a (legally) unlocked iPhone? Is it really that difficult in the states? Sure the initial price is expensive, but your contract would more than offset the price anyway. With an unlocked phone, you get to pick your carrier and contract as you please.