This thread is laughable, quite honestly. There is nothing wrong with the new Settings.
it's different (which some people find threatening), and life isn't perfect (but some expect an operating system to be... perfect, and on their terms...) 🙄This thread is laughable, quite honestly. There is nothing wrong with the new Settings.
your opinion. got it. 👍Or @fisherking people expect change to be justified, then to work and then to make sense without introducing new bugs when a slew of more important things needed addressing rather than wasting even more precious workflow time by navigating around the yearly drama that is now Mac OS.
Furthermore Linux and Windows have set out product development and support cycles versus Apple who treat the OS like an yearly software patch.
Yearly drama? For whom? Who are these "people" that you claim to speak for? Just you, maybe?Or @fisherking people expect change to be justified, then to work and then to make sense without introducing new bugs when a slew of more important things needed addressing rather than wasting even more precious workflow time by navigating around the yearly drama that is now Mac OS
and settings hidden in an "i" info icon. I would expect that would simply show help info,
I just had a magical system preferences moment.
My watch stopped unlocking my mac (cuz Apple). I went to System Preferences and didn't even bother looking for the setting. I just typed "Watch" and the single setting showed up. It was a fabulous thing. (I actually only got through "w", "a", "t" before the setting showed up.)
It's pretty amazing. I figured I'd try something random and expected to be disappointed. I typed "smb" and like magic, a bunch of network settings showed up. Also, just picking one of them even opened the extra popup that got me to the setting. And, it wasn't just a text search; the letters "smb" didn't appear anywhere in the titles or contents.
I guess it depends on how people work. This new preferences really suits me. It's possible the old system preferences did something like this, but I only remember having it pick the top level icon when I typed a search.
If it just responded more quickly (VERY sluggish on my machine) and had slightly bigger type, I'd have actually paid a developer (< $5.00) if they had introduced such a tool themselves.
The app does seem to be caching pages, since revisiting a setting tab opens it more quickly than when first going there. Sometimes, the initial visit to a setting tab takes about .5 seconds (approximate). Later visits seem much, much faster.
I don't like it. It is very difficult to find what you need. No need to break things that worked well.Do you like the MacOS Ventura System settings?
Or do you prefer them as they are now?
Personally I am not a fan of Apple iOS-ifying MacOS but what are your thoughts?
![]()
try the 'search' window in settings. then, once you see where something is, it will be there the next time you want to find it. soon you'll see that 'settings' works just as well as 'preferences'.I don't like it. It is very difficult to find what you need. No need to break things that worked well.
if you've been a macuser since system 7... think of all the changes you've adapted to. this is just one of those.I’ve been reading about all this back-and-forth for several months, and it brings to my mind a way to make this issue way more Mac-like from everyone’s viewpoint: have Apple give us users choices in the matter. I’ve been a Mac user for over 25 years, ever since System 7. Apple’s user interface was always easier to use than any Windows version, and that alone made it preferable, even to newcomers to computers.
So here we are in a new century, and Apple has come a long way in hardware and UIs since. And a lot of new users to Macs have come from phones. Their experience makes it easier to navigate Settings across the hardware spectrum. But a long-time Mac user has had to re-adjust with Ventura’s Settings UI. Why not make it so we can choose between two UIs going forward on desktop Macs? If us old dogs liked the System Preferences navigation on a Mac as opposed to the Settings on the iOS devices, why can’t we have the option?
Search is super useful, but it’s nothing new. It was introduced in System Preferences days. You can even launch Settings panes from Spotlight.I just had a magical system preferences moment.
My watch stopped unlocking my mac (cuz Apple). I went to System Preferences and didn't even bother looking for the setting. I just typed "Watch" and the single setting showed up. It was a fabulous thing. (I actually only got through "w", "a", "t" before the setting showed up.)
It's pretty amazing. I figured I'd try something random and expected to be disappointed. I typed "smb" and like magic, a bunch of network settings showed up. Also, just picking one of them even opened the extra popup that got me to the setting. And, it wasn't just a text search; the letters "smb" didn't appear anywhere in the titles or contents.
I guess it depends on how people work. This new preferences really suits me. It's possible the old system preferences did something like this, but I only remember having it pick the top level icon when I typed a search.
If it just responded more quickly (VERY sluggish on my machine) and had slightly bigger type, I'd have actually paid a developer (< $5.00) if they had introduced such a tool themselves.
The app does seem to be caching pages, since revisiting a setting tab opens it more quickly than when first going there. Sometimes, the initial visit to a setting tab takes about .5 seconds (approximate). Later visits seem much, much faster.
This is of course implying that Settings app on iOS is already so good that people would be disappointed that they couldn’t use the exact same app on the Mac.Their experience makes it easier to navigate Settings across the hardware spectrum.
This is of course implying that Settings app on iOS is already so good that people would be disappointed that they couldn’t use the exact same app on the Mac.
But it’s not. Even on iOS, the Settings app has been criticized for being not very intuitive and easy to use. You and others sharing this same opinion are trying so hard to rationalize something that is nothing more than Apple making things easier for themselves, not the end users.
This "one UI to rule them all" approach has been tried many times before, and it always failed. It will fail again.