You know, these smoking threads are always interesting to muse upon, because when you think about it there are larger issues involved, and I wonder how consistent people are in regards to them.
Rationally speaking, smoking is bad. It is patently unhealthy, and certainly causes undue misery for many in any number of manners.
Drinking is similarily bad. So is the using of almost all illicit drugs. So is gambling. So is random and/or unprotected sex. So is caffeine. So is bacon/greasy diets. So is salt. So are some fetishes. So is driving too fast. You can compile quite a list.
While you can quibble about the differences in how these above things are bad and unhealthy, you are arguing about technicality, not the essential truth - which is that there is a mountain of evidence to say that all these things can rightfully be called detrimental.
There is another commonality between these things, however, in that they are all "fun" for lack of better wording. This concept is rather hard to pin down, but it is these things that add the "zest" to life, that make us feel most alive, even as we tacitly acknowledge that often times we are risking that very life. Perhaps it is that risk, perhaps it's a psychology of chemical reactions in the brain - of adrenaline, of dopamine, of whatever. Laughter and attitude are not negligible concepts, however - they make our lives worth living, make things interesting and in some cases, make us live where we might otherwise die.
So to those of you who think poorly of smoking - fine, that is your right, and you certainly have a compelling case. To those who think poorly of smokers, you too have a compelling case, insofar as their activities impact your life. But be careful what you argue, because there is more at stake that some stupid people and their willingness to buy cancersticks.
There is always a social cost to irresponsible fun, although it is often harmless enough. Would you really have your "fun" legislated away to criminality? Have your choice made for you, even if the evidence seemed rationally compelling?
Liberty is a tough standard to adhere to, as it requires personal responsibility that not everyone can muster, at least not all the time - and those lapses have consequences. Despite this, it would not be a world worth living without.
Still, if you as an individual wants to exercise this liberty - to smoke, to drink, to have careless sex in an office closet - you must have no illusions about the responsibilities inherent in those choices, if you wish to continue to cherish those rights. Nothing comes for free, even "fun".
If you think I am defending smoking, or even exclusively talking about it - you are missing the point.
Look, half the time, I can't argue my way out of a paper bag - so perhaps you will not see my point or you might disagree with it. This post only serves as a discussion piece, nothing more.
So now I am off to get some drinks, have some fun, hopefully make some choices that sober I might actually think were stupid, perhaps meet people I woudn't normally meet and have an interesting tale to tell. Then I will take a cab home. Goodnight.