Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
I'd gladly pay $100 for an extra 2 inches.

Haha :D

I bought my wife a Mini and loved the form factor. I even said that if it came out with Retina I would buy one instead of another full size iPad.

However, after holding the Air I was sold on it.

My reasons for an Air over a Mini:

I do a lot of school work on it, the bigger screen helps when reading and writing papers.

If I need to I can log in to my work PC with the iPad. Again, the bigger screen helps.

I do not have any clothing or jackets with pockets big enough for the Mini. Therefore, I am not really losing any portability with the Air.
 
Because people have there own personal preference for a larger screen? Why don't ppl understand this. Ppl want what they want. Just because you think it's useless doesn't mean someone else will think it's useless.

Amen! haha

----------

When I think of words to describe the Air, 'useless' is the only one that comes to mind.

People are seriously ridiculous on this forum.

Ridiculous statement maker calls others ridiculous.... :cool:
 
WHAT?? Would apple do that? would apple underclock the mini 2? Never mind, now I see that 2 inches seriously matter for some of you =))

Well they never said they have the same performance, they just stated they both have the A7. The A7 in the Air is only slightly faster than the 5S, but it can sustain full clock speed for longer periods. My guess is the Mini will be somewhere in-between given the smaller case.

The main concern I would have with the retina mini is battery - from iPad 2 -> iPad 3 there was a noticeable dip in battery at the same screen brightness levels (Though they are stated to be the same.) Maybe with just one light bar they are able to control it better, but the original Mini's battery life has been a bit overstated by Apple in my experience (Versus being understated for the Air.)
 
Well they never said they have the same performance, they just stated they both have the A7. The A7 in the Air is only slightly faster than the 5S, but it can sustain full clock speed for longer periods. My guess is the Mini will be somewhere in-between given the smaller case.

The main concern I would have with the retina mini is battery - from iPad 2 -> iPad 3 there was a noticeable dip in battery at the same screen brightness levels (Though they are stated to be the same.) Maybe with just one light bar they are able to control it better, but the original Mini's battery life has been a bit overstated by Apple in my experience (Versus being understated for the Air.)

But I have an iPad 3 now and the battery rocks 7 hours of usage playing intense graphics games but it is still on 6.1.3 and they've also said that the A7 an the retina consume less than the previous models.
 
In that case, to me, its the Mini that is useless.

Id rather not strain my eyes trying to browse the web on such a small screen.



Just get what you want. It's that simple. And stop posting on these senseless discussion threads.:rolleyes:
 
Simple answer, no because the minis screen is too small unless you are a commuter who needs something smaller to fit in pocket- but why do that when you could have an iphone
 
I am personally surprised at the popularity of the Mini. From my perspective, the question I would ask is why anyone would want a smaller screen? Especially if one intended to use it for productivity, as the Mini's keyboard is quite small.

I guess that is why Apple offers the normal size and the Mini. People want different things for different reasons.
 
I love the mini and thought I would buy one when the retina model came out. But the Air solved the size and weight issues I was having with my old iPad 3, so I was sold on that immediately. I'd rather have the bigger screen for writing, gaming, browsing, reading, and just about everything else you use a tablet for.

In my opinion, the iPad Air is a cross between the old full sized models and the mini. Best of both worlds.
 
Mini is too small to watch a movie. In fact it is a generally uncomfortable size for reading and web surfing too.

I bought the air. For a small screen device I have my iPhone 5S.

Don't see any value in the size of the mini.
 
i think everything is too small to watch a movie unless you use a 32' inches flat tv

my minimum to see a movie (or a youtube video) is exactly the mini

mini or air it's like wich testicles is the biggest :D:apple:
 
I mean, the mini 2 has the same specs, 100 $ cheaper and it is smaller, why would anybody buy the air, you pay 100 $ for 2 inches.

If I wanted the mini I would have bought the mini. I choose the Air to replace my iPad 4.

Sounds like you have regrets or a lack of fund$.
 
I mean, the mini 2 has the same specs, 100 $ cheaper and it is smaller, why would anybody buy the air, you pay 100 $ for 2 inches.

Actually I think quite the opposite, I'm guessing with only a $100 difference, that alot who would have have bought the iPad mini will go ahead and get the iPad Air, with its weight dropping so significantly and it getting smaller with the same size screen. When it was $170 difference, that was free cell or almost 4x size (16 Gb to 64 Gb) for the same price in the smaller, lighter size, now its not as big a deal. Weight is now .73 lbs and 1.00 lbs, where the full size one used to be over twice the weight of the mini.
-Tig
 
Can't say I've watched many movies on any ipads I've owned including Mini. At home, i watch my much bigger tvs. When out, that 2 hour window to watch a movie just never develops.

For web browsing, i hit my 27" PC or iphone. For reading, I still prefer my iphone. Comics? PC. But they're doable on a Mini.

The only reason I kept the ipad Mini was for games. Kingdom Rush was fun. I'm really into chess. Certain games like that. The full sized ipads are just too big. The Mini is better suited for this type of gaming.

The retina Mini may expand my uses of it. With the promise of crisp text, I may prefer this as my reader. The A7 will speed up things. This is the one.
 
Congratulations!

You are the winner of the "Most useless thread title ever"

Your prize is all the posts that support and condemn your thread

Enjoy
 
I mean, the mini 2 has the same specs, 100 $ cheaper and it is smaller, why would anybody buy the air, you pay 100 $ for 2 inches.
We are talking 7 vs 9 inches.
Not 155 vs 157.

In the ipad's case, 2 inches makes a huge difference. And don't forget, it's not about the size, it's how you use it.;)
 
This is a dumb conversation. Its like comparing a Toyota land cruiser to a Toyota Rav 4. Sure they both have 4 wheels but one is smaller and is convenient at times but all in all its cheaper and smaller. I type on my iPad air and its not easy on the mini.
 
You try reading sheet music off an iPad Mini and come back and tell me the Air is useless.

Ditto. That was the primary reason I bought the Air. Being able to read my newspaper and magazines more comfortably are secondary reasons. Larger videos and games are nice as well.

I still prefer the mini for reading books, and when I toss an iPad in my purse, it will be the mini. That is why I plan to get a retina Mini.

But it is almost impossible to read sheet music on it, and the Air is wonderful for that.

I like and use both sizes. But I can see why both would be preferred by different users. What I don't understand is the need for some to trash the one they don't prefer. Just because I like Coke doesn't mean Pepsi is useless.
 
If I wanted the mini I would have bought the mini. I choose the Air to replace my iPad 4.

Sounds like you have regrets or a lack of fund$.

I regret buying the 3rd gen, it gets dusty on my desk and I use it only few hours in the weekend and I thought why: because it is too big and heavy.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.