So my statement was based on voting for president solely on one principle of what he stands for. I disagree about publicly funded education equating with asking for a handout, but that's neither here nor there; it wasn't the point of my comparison. I don't feel a person should vote simply based on one bullet point, but I'm aware many do. God Bless America.
...
The order was to open the encryption on one specific iPhone belonging to known terrorist scumbags. This doesn't give the government the "keys to the encrypted kingdom", as it were.
I wholeheartedly disagree with the recent legislation presented to restrict all phone encryption.
Apple can break the encryption on that one phone without revealing how to break the encryption on all the other iPhones.
Yet we pay into Social Security. You know that social program that distributes wealth... Or how about we get rid of all social services like Child Protection, and Public Education.
I see the lovely Dianne Feinstein has come out against Apple. So far the only one in tech to support Apple is the former CEO of Whatsapp. Sad.
Trump is crazy. I pity you if he becomes a president of the United States. It will become a very dangerous world to live in.
What makes you think Apple can break the encryption.Apple can break the encryption on that one phone without revealing how to break the encryption on all the other iPhones.
The software created to open this one iPhone could be used to open any iPhone. That's the point Apple is making and the point the government is either missing or being deliberately disingenuous about.
What makes you think Apple can break the encryption.
Ahhh, the 'ol "I work there..." statement. smhApple can easily unlock this phone and hand it over to the Feds without revealing any deencryption secrets or tools. This phone wasn't even owned by the terrorist, it was given to him by his employer, the state of California. The phone is government property.
Tim Cook is indirectly assisting terrorists by not complying with the order. Cook can fight it, that is his right. He may have to fight it from jail, and he probably should. I'm all for individual privacy. Apple can comply with with the order and still protect everyone's right to encrypted privacy.
IMO, Tim Cook is doing this not to protect privacy, but to protect his market share. The outrage from Apple patrons would be high and sales would certainly suffer if he complies right away. He will eventually cave and the spin machine at Apple will make it seem like Cook is some crusader for privacy rights. He is driven by the stocks and the almighty dollar, that's it.
[doublepost=1455746150][/doublepost]
I work "in the industry". But let's just call it a hunch.
I see the lovely Dianne Feinstein has come out against Apple. So far the only one in tech to support Apple is the former CEO of Whatsapp. Sad.
Apple can easily unlock this phone and hand it over to the Feds without revealing any deencryption secrets or tools. This phone wasn't even owned by the terrorist, it was given to him by his employer, the state of California. The phone is government property.
Tim Cook is indirectly assisting terrorists by not complying with the order. Cook can fight it, that is his right. He may have to fight it from jail, and he probably should. I'm all for individual privacy. Apple can comply with with the order and still protect everyone's right to encrypted privacy.
IMO, Tim Cook is doing this not to protect privacy, but to protect his market share. The outrage from Apple patrons would be high and sales would certainly suffer if he complies right away. He will eventually cave and the spin machine at Apple will make it seem like Cook is some crusader for privacy rights. He is driven by the stocks and the almighty dollar, that's it.
[doublepost=1455746150][/doublepost]
I work "in the industry". But let's just call it a hunch.
LOL @ thinking tim cook should be in jail
get a grip
Nope - Voting for government paid education is asking for a handout.
Demanding government not allow the undercutting of high skill wages is a sound market principle.
The H-1B visa abuse situation has decimated my profession because it allows undercutting the price of high value job skills - market principals dictate that when demand for something goes up, so should its price. Even Sanders understands this. So even though I'm a "Milton Friedman" conservative, I'll vote with the students for Bernie before Cruz, Clinton, or Rubio.
Bill Clinton took 260k from the Indian outsourcing firm HCL to give a speech - so Hillary is also bought and paid for....
This is mind boggling.
Ahhh, the 'ol "I work there..." statement. smh
If your job is decimated because of H-1B, then it just means you're untalented enough so that some hack from India can take your job.
If you want to keep earning income, you need to have talent.
High-End experts don't get replaced by H-1B workers.
Not really. What he neglected to note is that fully 3 of 5 gun deaths in the US are a result of suicide. Also, virtually all of the deplorable incidents of mass killing occurs in places were firearm prohibitions are posted. If someone wants to murder loads of people, they go to where people are defenceless; a person intent on committing murder immediately doesn't care about gun laws or any sort of law. You can only be executed or sentence to life in prison once.
LOL, maybe because ISIS is in Syria and the Levant, not the USA.Fact: The govt has killed more americans in the past year than ISIS has.
Not if it means hiring hackers who are going to produce crap. Unless you're Microsoft in the 90s-2000s...This is dead wrong. Companies look to save money any place they can.