Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
The more important thing that will happen is the corporate tax rate cut and incentives to bring their hundreds of billions in cash back to the U.S. without getting gouged 35%. No way in hell I would keep money in the U.S. at 35% when I can get a sweet heart deal elsewhere and keep more money. That's just bad business. Good move by dropping that rate and getting SOMETHING rather than nothing.

That money will do nothing other than enrich Apple executives and stockholders. As an owner of several thousand share of AAPL, I like that. As an American, I don't.
 
America is no longer a manufacturing country. We have passed that stage of economic development.

The same Americans wanting their manufacturing jobs back, will then not be able to even afford the goods they are manufacturing. Tax cuts aside, the iPhone couldn't stay the same "low price" it is now.

China can live without America, we cannot live without China. This plan would backfire, 'tremendously'

12M jobs in manufacturing today is not "no longer". Certainly it's not full output, but no one wishes for a fully industrialized economy. We wish for full allowable output. (for reference: 110M are employed in non-manufacturing, but that includes transportation and government). A manufacturing to services ratio of 1:10 is not bad at all. I wish it was 1:5.

The other meaningful info is the actual output.:
Manufacturing: 6,944,000,000
Services (incld. gov't and transportation): 19,090,000,000

or a 1:3 ratio... or 578/worker for manufacturing and 173/worker for services.
Now, tell me how US manufacturing isn't strong.
 
At least they are talking and Trump is willing to make sweet tax exemptions for massive American Corporations like Apple. This is a start.

He isn't asking apple to restructure their compete iPhone manufacturing operation.

But for Apple to at least met somewhere in the middle to bring some jobs and revenue over to the U.S. if feasible.
 
Sure you can, at least in the manner described by this article. Small businesses are the leading provider of jobs in America. According to SBA statistics, small businesses provide 64% of new private-sector jobs. By providing a tax subsidy to a large corporation like apple ($600B market cap), the government would be taking money collected from the small businesses (income taxes) and giving it to a large corporation to create only a few new net jobs vs those that could be created by using those taxes to help the businesses actually driving domestic employment. It's sheer madness to give a $600B corporation tax advantages that are denied to the smaller businesses actually creating the most jobs.

Very true, you also need to help Small Business, but that's where the local government can help the most rather than the Feds.
Let me point out that a lot of small businesses depend on those large corps. You don't want to punish either one.
 
  • Like
Reactions: RogerWilco
I don't want them to make iPhones here, think of all of the air pollution and toxic waste that gets released/exposed...keep Apple green and that garbage there ;) Also, the workforce/wage/skill cannot be beat in China (America = $10/hour, China = $.10/hour)
 
  • Like
Reactions: paul4339
As much as some people hate Trump there is no way you can say this is a bad thing to bring jobs and manufacturing back to the US.
and who's going to work there? the pay may be less than ideal...and how will they treat employees, they surely can't get away with the treatment they have in china.


Manufacturing will be mostly done by robots within 5 years anyways.
thats what they said 10, 15, 20, 30 years ago...maybe soon enough
 
Apple building a large plant is unlikely (but they might make another symbolic move like they did with the Mac Pro). That said a big tax cut on overseas income is a very good possibility. That would benefit Apple, Google, and Microsoft, among others. They could pay dividends without having to borrow money, or in Apple's case they could send the money back to update their stores without incurring debt. Apple has lots of cash, but most of it is stuck overseas.
 
  • Like
Reactions: VMMan
12M jobs in manufacturing today is not "no longer". Certainly it's not full output, but no one wishes for a fully industrialized economy. We wish for full output. (for reference: 110M are employed in non-manufacturing, but that includes transportation and government). A manufacturing to services ration of 1:10 is not bad at all. I wish it was 1:5.

The other meaningful info is the actual output.:
Manufacturing: 6,944,000,000
Services (incld. gov't and transportation): 19,090,000,000

or a 1:3 ratio... or 578/worker for manufacturing and 173/worker for services.
Now, tell me how US manufacturing isn't strong.

Frozen numbers in time don't speak as loudly as trends. Fact: Manufacturing is on the decline in America. I'm sorry you "wish" a certain ratio, but again, what is fact and what you want, are two different realities.

NO ONE would produce iPhones for the same wages that Chinese workers are being paid. If Trump imposes tariffs on Chinese goods, it will literally destroy our economy. You don't see any educated economists supporting Trumps's ideas for this reason alone.
 
As much as some people hate Trump there is no way you can say this is a bad thing to bring jobs and manufacturing back to the US.
But that's the thing, it won't. Let's pretend Apple does build big factories in the US to make their products. How many new jobs do you think it will create? I'd actually bet it wouldn't be as much as you'd think. They would 100% use this opportunity to automate as much as they can. Who would pay for all this? The US tax payers since they gave heavy cuts to Apple
 
  • Like
Reactions: Xi Xone
As much as he is reviled, this should be Trump's bread and butter, at least more than any other issue. He says he understands business, money, and trade better than anyone. His voters think he understands business, money, and trade as well as anyone. I'm really interested to see if this career businessman will make as much difference as people hope (or fear) he will. So far he has kept several promises and broken one or two. One thing's for sure -- he is definitely shaking things up, which can be good for an economy that was somewhat stagnated.

Apple would score major points if they could move something as high-volume as the iPhone's production to the USA. The Mac Pro is a bitter subject, but that was one of the big selling points when it was released. Imagine the free publicity and how much they would promote "Designed by Apple in California. Made in the USA." if they could put it on the iPhone. It's going to take companies like Apple, with large cash reserves, to bite the bullet and absorb some costs in order to get the industry trends changed. But if they can pull it off, our country should be much better for it.


You do realize that manufacturing iPhones here would be a logistics nightmare. All the major and minor parts for modern electronics are made in Southeast Asia. So now all those parts will have to be shipped here for assembly. The turn around time from design to production will increase. The procurement costs will increase. And most definitely the shipping costs will increase.

To stem the costs of all that would require a smaller workforce and more automation. So no real change... but we get to say 'made in 'Murica!'

And BTW.... those of you who fell for the 'I'm a successful businessman' schpeal....

A country is not a business.
 
Last edited:
Frozen numbers in time don't speak as loudly as trends. Fact: Manufacturing is on the decline in America. I'm sorry you "wish" a certain ratio, but again, what is fact and what you want, are two different realities.

Exactly. See the decline (what you say is true), do something to reverse - or at least stop - the trend. What, are we going just to let things be now?
Manufacturing is not in decline because "Americans don't want to work".
 



In a recent interview with The New York Times, President-elect Donald Trump said he received phone calls from Apple CEO Tim Cook and Microsoft co-founder Bill Gates after winning the presidential election earlier this month.

Donald-Trump-NYT.jpg

Donald Trump at The New York Times offices in Manhattan

Trump told Cook it will be a "real achievement" for him when he gets Apple to make its products in the United States, as opposed to countries like China and Vietnam where many of its current manufacturing partners operate.Cook acknowledged the proposition by nondescriptly saying "I understand that," according to Trump.

Trump said he is confident Apple will turn to U.S. manufacturing based on the incentives he plans to offer the iPhone maker, including a "very large tax cut" and "substantial regulation cuts" for corporations.A recent report said Apple asked its Taiwanese manufacturing partner Foxconn to study the possibility of moving iPhone production to the United States, although Foxconn chairman Terry Gou is said to be less enthusiastic about the idea due to inevitably higher production costs compared to China.

While campaigning at Liberty University in Virginia earlier this year, Trump said "we're going to get Apple to start building their damn computers and things in this country instead of in other countries," while he has also threatened to introduce a 45% tax on products imported from China.

Cook previously said Apple manufactures iPhones in China because the country has put an "enormous focus on manufacturing," while noting the U.S. workforce has a smaller number of individuals with the "vocational kind of skills" needed.Apple also benefits from lower wages in China, where many of its suppliers are located within close proximity of each other. In Asia, Taiwan's TSMC makes A-series chips for iPhones, Japan's Sharp and Japan Display supply iPhone displays, and South Korea's SK Hynix and Japan's Toshiba produce memory chips for the device.

Apple does have a Mac Pro manufacturing facility in Austin, Texas, operated by Flextronics, but it is a limited effort given the relatively low production volume of its high-end desktop computer.

Cook was personally a Hillary Clinton supporter, hosting a fundraiser for the Democratic presidential nominee in August on behalf of himself. In a company-wide memo issued following Trump's victory, Cook urged Apple employees to "move forward together" despite "uncertainties ahead."

Apple as a company showed support for both the Democratic and Republican parties during their respective campaigns, but it reportedly withheld support for the 2016 Republican National Convention due to Trump's controversial comments about minorities, women, and immigrants, among other subjects.

Note: Due to the political nature of the discussion regarding this topic, the discussion thread is located in our Politics, Religion, Social Issues forum. All forum members and site visitors are welcome to read and follow the thread, but posting is limited to forum members with at least 100 posts.

Article Link: Donald Trump Tells Tim Cook He'll Offer Apple Incentives and 'Very Large Tax Cut' to Make Products in America

Getting Apple and other tech companies to bring their jobs back here is great. We need those jobs. But the rest of what he said about tax cuts and regulations is really problematic. I'm sure there are regulations that are frivolous, but he's said in the past that he wants to get rid of the spa and fad. So who knows hair far he'll go on that. Lowering taxes for corporations is unfair. Lower the taxes for the middle and lower class. Large corporations can afford to pay way more in taxe, yet now they're going to have to pay a lower amount?
 
As much as some people hate Trump there is no way you can say this is a bad thing to bring jobs and manufacturing back to the US.

As much as I hate Trump, I would hate even more having to pay more for an iPhone in the UK because of more expensive manufacturing.

Fact is, Samsung doesn't produce in the USA. Samsung doesn't produce in places were workers' rights have improved, largely due to Apple's efforts. They go to cheaper places where workers have no rights at all. Moving production to the USA will only happen if Apple can sell iPhones at the same price as before. And in the same numbers as before. And the same quality.
 
  • Like
Reactions: hondo77
Very true, you also need to help Small Business, but that's where the local government can help the most rather than the Feds.
Let me point out that a lot of small businesses depend on those large corps. You don't want to punish either one.

The majority of customers to small businesses are other small businesses and individual consumers. The only thing you get from the government subsidization of large businesses is even larger businesses and worse, government-created monopolies.
 
Apple's whole business model is predicated on Asian slave labor.
How many American workers are going to want to work 15 hour days for $350/ month?

iPhone manufacturing will never come to the USA. It's too late.
 
The majority of customers to small businesses are other small businesses and individual consumers. The only thing you get from the government subsidization of large businesses is even larger businesses and worse, government-created monopolies.

It is a possibility. On the other hands, I see as pivotal a coordination between the US and the States. In the near future local government will be increasingly important, especially because opening a business - of any kind - is easier than ever.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.