We are taking about mobile devices here so if one is not into showing of how much greater his display is compared to the guy next to him this brings zero value for the user, but makes text harder to read. I realy wished they would care more about usability then flashy looks.
UI is about more than just looks. It also needs to convey information and reinforce the UI metaphors. In this case the distinct look of the notification pull down helps to communicate the state of the running application while looking at the notification screen. It conveys to the user that despite the application being completely obscured by the notification screen, didn't go anywhere. It is safe and sound right behind the notification screen.
The Teehanlax UI looks very clean, but it fails to communicate the metaphor. I see it that screen and wonder what has become of my app. This make the Teehanlax UI feel more intrusive despite functionally being exactly the same.
There needs to be a balance between a distinctive and a clean design. I'm not claiming that the iOS5 design is prefect, but it's in the right direction.
In my opinion, it looks fine on the iPhone since it takes up the whole screen. It looks stupid on the iPad since it is this huge strip dropping down in the middle of the screen.
But to be honest, what else would they put? A solid white background like Android?
UI is about more than just looks. It also needs to convey information and reinforce the UI metaphors. In this case the distinct look of the notification pull down helps to communicate the state of the running application while looking at the notification screen. It conveys to the user that despite the application being completely obscured by the notification screen, didn't go anywhere. It is safe and sound right behind the notification screen.
The Teehanlax UI looks very clean, but it fails to communicate the metaphor. I see it that screen and wonder what has become of my app. This make the Teehanlax UI feel more intrusive despite functionally being exactly the same.
There needs to be a balance between a distinctive and a clean design. I'm not claiming that the iOS5 design is prefect, but it's in the right direction.
To be fair to Teehanlax, you're missing what their concept shows. It's not about being over the top of the app. Their version (from a few years ago remember) is a home screen that is on the same level but to the left of the apps. That's why the main 4 icons are still at the bottom and a home icon shows up along with the dots and magnifying glass.
However, if you ignore the bottom half of their design that puts it in the screen context, theirs fits more than the linen texture (at least as far as your analysis goes). The simple black would go perfectly for something that is supposed to go OVER the screen. The linen texture has been used for things that are UNDER the screen. Using it in both places makes it appear to be both under and over the screen which actually makes less sense.
The Teehanlax screen communicates the metaphor more clearly than that ugly linen texture.
Honestly, I can't believe that anyone actually likes that horrible texture. One of my friends (who has no experience using Photoshop) made something similar (and actually better looking) on his own for a website back in 2003. I hated it then too.
I'm sad that it'll end up in Lion, and I'm sad that you guys think that that is ok and "consistent." Something being consistent doesn't automatically mean that it's good.
If Apple really wanted to be consistent about it, they could have done something like this (and yes, I know that it doesn't work on non-titlebar apps, but it's an idea). Pull the titlebar down and keep it there so that it makes sense. My apologies for the duplicated items, I only had a few minutes.
It's all subjective I guess. I like the linen texture and think it's a perfect sub-background look. It instantly gives the impression that it lies underneath the wallpaper, exactly what Apple is going for. When you access a screen with that linen texture you know that you are going "deeper" into the device, as it were.
It's not a matter of liking the linen texture or not. The issue is whether the notification bar intuitively appears to be on top of the running application. When I look at the Teehanlax screen, I do not get that impression. With the iOS5 screen, I do. This makes the Teehanlax theme more jarring. (this is completely subjective)Honestly, I can't believe that anyone actually likes that horrible texture. One of my friends (who has no experience using Photoshop) made something similar (and actually better looking) on his own for a website back in 2003. I hated it then too.
I'm fine with the design. Looks clean and classy to me.
It seems to be a silly thing to complain about. The more and more I read, the more and more I sense that some people would be satisfied with a sack of dog turds as long as the bag was "pretty."
I'm all for pretty, but being functional trumps it.
I'd rather Apple work out the bugs in the OS than worry about something as silly as this.
It's not a matter of liking the linen texture or not. The issue is whether the notification bar intuitively appears to be on top of the running application. When I look at the Teehanlax screen, I do not get that impression. With the iOS5 screen, I do. This makes the Teehanlax theme more jarring. (this is completely subjective)
Admittedly the iOS5 UI has problems. I don't like the use of the same texture for both above and below layers (I'd prefer folders to open over the home screen, not behind), also it alternates between smokey and black transparencies (see the new lock screen notification).
To be fair to Teehanlax, you're missing what their concept shows. It's not about being over the top of the app. Their version (from a few years ago remember) is a home screen that is on the same level but to the left of the apps. That's why the main 4 icons are still at the bottom and a home icon shows up along with the dots and magnifying glass.
However, if you ignore the bottom half of their design that puts it in the screen context, theirs fits more than the linen texture (at least as far as your analysis goes). The simple black would go perfectly for something that is supposed to go OVER the screen. The linen texture has been used for things that are UNDER the screen. Using it in both places makes it appear to be both under and over the screen which actually makes less sense.
The Teehanlax screen communicates the metaphor more clearly than that ugly linen texture.
Honestly, I can't believe that anyone actually likes that horrible texture. One of my friends (who has no experience using Photoshop) made something similar (and actually better looking) on his own for a website back in 2003. I hated it then too.
I'm sad that it'll end up in Lion, and I'm sad that you guys think that that is ok and "consistent." Something being consistent doesn't automatically mean that it's good.
If Apple really wanted to be consistent about it, they could have done something like this (and yes, I know that it doesn't work on non-titlebar apps, but it's an idea). Pull the titlebar down and keep it there so that it makes sense. My apologies for the duplicated items, I only had a few minutes.
I'd rather Apple work out the bugs in the OS than worry about hiring a designer for the Notification Center.