Two protruding cameras?
Colour me out.
*grabs crayons*
Two protruding cameras?
Colour me out.
I've never been more excited to not buy the iPhone 6SS, and wait for the 2017 iPhone.![]()
That's not fragmentation, it's just an extra feature, just like the 6 Plus has optical image stabilisation.I'm thinking the same thing. But if Jobs was still around he would've said to figure out how to make it work or don't use it at all. I don't believe that fragmentation is something he wanted.
Anyway my guess is that if it's thinner, then both the iPhone 7 and the iPhone 7 plus will be of the same thinness, so if the dual camera doesn't fit it's not because of the thickness, but rather the available space around the camera.It will be. Around 0.8mm to 1mm thinner.
Apple is becoming more and more disappointing as they drag on Mac's, slow HDs, expensive RAM upgrades and fragmented phone components.
I think 7 will have optical stabilization (currently only in 6s plus),
while 7plus will have OIS and dual lenses
So not one but two warts on this one. Making their worst design ever even worse. Thats a feat few thought possible.
Then you should switch to Windows/Android.
Good luck with that.
Dual cameras will be exclusive to Apple's next-generation 5.5-inch iPhone, according to a new research note issued by respected KGI Securities analyst Ming-Chi Kuo.Rumors surrounding dual-camera iPhones have gained momentum since January, when Kuo said that Apple has both single- and dual-camera iPhone 7 Plus models in development. Recent reports have been unclear, however, about whether the 4.7-inch iPhone 7 will also have dual cameras.![]()
Leaks surrounding the rumored dual cameras have been limited to a blurry photo of the purported iPhone 7 Plus (or iPhone Pro?) and a possible dual-lens module appropriate for the 5.5-inch smartphone. Apple reportedly received dual-lens camera samples from suppliers for testing purposes in February.
![]()
LinX Technology multi-aperture camera modules
The rumored camera improvements have been linked to Apple's acquisition of LinX Technology, which could lead to "DSLR-quality" photos on iPhones. LinX's multi-aperture cameras are also smaller sized than single-aperture cameras, meaning the iPhone 7 Plus could have a slightly less protruding camera lens.
LinX camera modules have a number of other benefits, including 3D depth mapping, better color accuracy and uniformity, ultra HDR, low noise levels, higher resolution, low costs, zero shutter lag, and a compact design that allows for edge-to-edge displays. A recent video demo provides a good overview of dual-camera technology.
Apple recently patented a dual-camera system consisting of one standard wide-angle lens, similar to what is found in the latest iPhones, and a second telephoto lens capable of capturing zoomed-in video and photos. In a recent video, we visualized what the interface could look like on future iOS devices.
(Top Image: Cameraplex)
Article Link: Dual Camera Said to Be Exclusive to 5.5-Inch iPhone 7
Anyway my guess is that if it's thinner, then both the iPhone 7 and the iPhone 7 plus will be of the same thinness, so if the dual camera doesn't fit it's not because of the thickness, but rather the available space around the camera.
I never thought I'd say this - the more iPhone 7 rumours, the more tempting the Galaxy S7 looks. If only it could run iOS...
While I agree in general with your sentiment, other than the camera is there anything else different about the 5.5" model? Marketing departments will always come up with ways to get people to spend more money. With iPhone Apple decided the camera would be that thing. How is this different than other companies that have phones with different specs at different price points? Nokia didn't bring its 41MP camera to every phone in its lineup. My guess is Apple marketing felt they wouldn't get enough people to spend $100 more for a slightly bigger screen so they decided to give it a better camera. I'm not arguing right or wrong just my guess at Apple's thinking.
And where exactly is the home button and Touch ID supposed to go? If new technology that got rid of the physical home button was available to be manufacturer en mass and Apple was working on it we'd know about it by now.
Right because Jobs could wave a magic wand and make whatever he wanted happen. There are 3 possibilities here: it's an engineering issue, it's a marketing decision or it's a bit of both. Or their might be a 4th possibility: supply constraints and the 5.5" model doesn't sell in the quanitity the 4.7" model does. Anyway I think Steve Jobs did a pretty good job of getting people to spend more money. Remember the black plastic MacBook that was more expensive than its white counterpart?
What a silly statement.
This is like expecting a Honda Fit, Honda Civic, and Honda Accord to all have the exact same engine.
Dude every heard of geometry? You can't expect a small phone to pack in all the same hardware as a much larger phone. Just as you can't expect a sub compact car to have the same engine as a full sized car.
I doubt that, remember the latest expensive iPad Pro does not have OIS, and it's a 9.7" tablet! No excuses for lack of space. They literally just took the iPhone 6S camera and stuck it in, when they could have just as easily have taken the 6S Plus camera and put it in, yes it's a tablet and not many will take photos with them but if you're selling a device as a top end maximum specced 'Pro' device, then surely you would put your best camera in it too?
Apple likes profit too much, I would be very surprised if you see OIS in the non Plus iPhone.
Nonsense. None of these features - camera, CPU, 3D Touch, Pencil, etc. take up a significant fraction of the available area and volume of the phone or tablet. There is more than enough space to fit them in all size devices. The only components that are too big to fit in the small from factor devices are the large screen and the extra battery needed to drive the larger screen. Those should be the only differentiating feature between different iPhone and iPad sizes.
Have you actually paid attention to any of the device tear down photos and looked at how little space is occupied by anything other than the screen and battery before throwing around unsupportable insults?
While I agree in general with your sentiment, other than the camera is there anything else different about the 5.5" model?
The honest answer is no, the current cameras we have are quite sufficient for most tasks we use them for. But the issue is that people buy an iPhone for an awesome camera, and limiting the best camera to the large model is going to annoy a lot of people (Even the OIS being left out of 6/6s was an annoyance for a lot of people.)A lot of people are going to be upset about this but stop and think about it for a second. Do you REALLY need this feature?![]()
Same w/ OIS... To differentiate both models.
I'd just chalk it up to Apple's marketing... pushing users to the bigger model.
Already have Windows and Linux on my Mac but I may switch hardware.
The honest answer is no, the current cameras we have are quite sufficient for most tasks we use them for. But the issue is that people buy an iPhone for an awesome camera, and limiting the best camera to the large model is going to annoy a lot of people (Even the OIS being left out of 6/6s was an annoyance for a lot of people.)