Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
I would assume that the hiding would be per recipient, and you would always see the full edit history of your own messages. I.e. every user sees exactly the history of what they themselves have previously seen.
Sounds plausible. Just require a bit more tracking.
 
Does it indicate the “version” someone directly replied to? Or just points to the latest edit?
 
Nice. Just to share: iMessage is basically only used in USA.
Is ok, but how about love for other globally used features? (Up next widget, a clock widget that shows the local time, not Cuperino time by default, edit mistyped phone numbers, more widgets after 2 or 3 years of having the same, etc.)
 
  • Like
Reactions: nvmls
What's the point of having an "Edit" option if it's going to show the original text?

Apple should give users permission to add that feature into the messages app. Otherwise, it should not show the user has made any changes by default.
I have a feeling this is in response to those violence against women’s groups who were complaining that the feature allowed bad guys to send threatening text messages and then just delete them in order to hide evidence. If you remember, there was a pretty big uproar from those groups, asking Apple to limit the feature. It looks like they did just that, reducing the delete time frame to just two minutes so perps would have to decide fast. And the edit history is there as well to prevent hiding evidence.

I’m not exactly sure how I feel about this. While I don’t like these new restrictions, I can understand why those groups are asking Apple to essentially cripple the feature. I prefer to err on the side of more freedom, so I lean towards preferring the old way
 
There’s a pretty big hole in this reasoning. Wouldn’t the “I like snuggle fabric softener” text violate an order of no contact just as much as an abusive or harassing text message? And yeah, such a message could be considered abusive if the reason for sending it is “hey, think of me, I can still exert some influence over your life”, like someone trying to trigger a trauma response in the other person.
For a restraining order, yes any text would be an issue. However you should note I included a simple scenario of harassment that does not depend upon a restraining order. There are other simple scenarios people can easily consider as well. If the sender has nothing to hide then why fear an edit history? Seeing a funny misspelling or seeing that the edit was providing clarification shouldn’t cause consternation to the sender.
 
and many others, but they think you're gonna love it so stay strong!
Yes, and many others think along similar lines to me. Perhaps having to work in an industry with plenty of accountability and auditing gives me a broader perspective. More times than you think I’ve had to show people logs and audit events to demonstrate that they did indeed do the very things they claimed they did not.
 
  • Angry
Reactions: Tech for Kings
An Invisible wokeness strikes again. Almost like the AIRTAG, the attempt to make a perfect solution has provided no real solution at all. Someone figured out how this text feature could be abused and neutered it before was ever officially released.
I think you read way too much Jordan Peterson to read an entire philosophy into one simple change in imessage.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: zach-coleman
It already is. You literally have to click Edited to view the changes. it doesnt constantly add new lines for every edit
Oh right on, I'm not doing any beta testing since

1. No secondary device to test on.
2. I don't have any friends that have iOS 16 beta

Nice to know my "wish" was already there. Thanks for the clarification. :)
 
  • Like
Reactions: mthomas184
I’d have to agree 100%. If this is the way it’s released I’d have to say this ranks up there as one of the dumbest features Apple has ever released.

Though, one could think that this feature is perfectly fine since most new iOS adoption rates are fairly quick. So I'd say this wouldn't be a problem for vary long.
 
Unsending after being delivered, sounds wrong. Rather have a delay before sending like email apps
Agree.

Having some kind of toggle to enable a timed delay and option to delete before delivery for all your iMessages because you know you "butt dial" often would be a good solution.

But those who intentionally harass through iMessage shouldn't have a two minute window to erase messages if they have been received by the recipient.

Harassers could potentially abuse the feature by sending and unsending repeatedly and the recipient would have no evidence of the conversation apart from maybe screen shots.

Sounds like a recipe for tons of unnecessary chaos especially considering how mobile and wired Internet connections in themselves can act like an unintentional delay between iMessage/iCloud servers and iMessager users.

But all in all, I really don't see the validity of iMessage edit & unsend.

-Why edit if the edits are visible? Why edit at all if you can unsend instead?
 
Last edited:
What's the point of having an "Edit" option if it's going to show the original text?

Apple should give users permission to add that feature into the messages app. Otherwise, it should not show the user has made any changes by default.
Exactly. I think apple should remove this in the next beta, or yes, at least let us choose if you want to show edits.
 
Yes, and many others think along similar lines to me. Perhaps having to work in an industry with plenty of accountability and auditing gives me a broader perspective. More times than you think I’ve had to show people logs and audit events to demonstrate that they did indeed do the very things they claimed they did not.
Riiight, but now iMessage, the brand new shiny accountability & auditing toy will make your company look finally serious. Glad it's helping you.

Maybe they should call it the "band aid" feature, for communication between poor morally made specimens.
 
It's only viewable if you click to see it, it's not there the whole time.
OK? And who isn't going to click to see it? I just don't get what problem this solves - if you made a typo that is so egregious as to be undecipherable, just send another message with the error corrected; we've been using "*" for years now to denote such a change, is that seriously what this feature is trying to replace? Why even bother?
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.