Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
OK? And who isn't going to click to see it? I just don't get what problem this solves - if you made a typo that is so egregious as to be undecipherable, just send another message with the error corrected; we've been using "*" for years now to denote such a change, is that seriously what this feature is trying to replace? Why even bother?
So obviously for you, this feature is a "meh" reaction. You can go on with life without ever using it and it won't affect you. I think it's useful as I hate having typos in my messages. Also edit for autocorrect that changes your words on you is nice.
 
  • Like
Reactions: compwiz1202
So obviously for you, this feature is a "meh" reaction. You can go on with life without ever using it and it won't affect you. I think it's useful as I hate having typos in my messages. Also edit for autocorrect that changes your words on you is nice.
Using "*" on the typo is still way more efficient than "editing" the entire message lol
 
It’s quite simple, I present one scenario: Say someone sent threatening or harassing messages (perhaps to a spouse or former partner) and then edited them to say “I like snuggle fabric softener”. It would be a convenient way to skirt restraining orders or intimidate/harass/threaten without the recipient being able to prove it.

While some will use this feature for banal and reasonable reasons there will be a subset who will look for ways to exploit it for personal gain or to harm another.
That's what screenshots are for!
 
The problem now is that a lot of people will avoid upgrading to iOS 16 to avoid edits altogether now.

It’s just going to slow adoption of iOS 16 I’m afraid.

I don't think it will matter to the update % all that much. People on macrumors are not normal people.

LOL! you know what I mean.
 
One ☝️ major point is if you introduce a feature then that’s the bar you expect when it releases. That’s what got you excited about it. Hell, I thought 15 minutes was too short a time. Now it’s only 2 minutes, and they can see what you originally edited? I can see them throwing away the feature completely at this rate.


And they’ll probably get rid of the unsend feature as well if they’re worried about threats of violence. For example, and correct me if I’m wrong, I can send someone a message threatening harm.. then once I know they read it I can unsend it. Yeah both features are done because of WOMEN’s groups.
 
Last edited:
That's what screenshots are for!
You can't always use screenshots as evidence or proof since they can be easily doctored. You'd also have to somehow prove that your screenshot is real. Already posted an example earlier just by using an online site to create it. Or to be even more realistic, one could send actual messages to a friend or another device/account of theirs to screenshot in order to frame someone else...
 
Yea, and..?
Comparing an open forum with a private personal/group interaction, come on.

If someone "liked" your message and you edited it afterwards, then it wouldn't pass Apple's moral standards?
No matter how they do it there's always some drawback. That's my point. Forums or messages, same problem.

I don't see any benefits in the edit history not existing other than avoiding embarrassment or accountability. Don't know why that's something people want so badly.
 
  • Like
Reactions: nwcs


With the fourth betas of iOS 16 and iPadOS 16 that were released today, Apple tweaked the edit and unsend features that are available for iMessages. When you edit a message, the edit history is now sent to the recipient along with the edit, so the original content is visible.

iPhone-13-Editable-Messages-Feature.jpg

On an edited iMessage, you can tap on the small blue "Edited" label to see the edit history, and it can be hidden again by tapping on "Hide Edits." Prior to this beta, an edited message noted that it was edited, but there was no option to tap and see the previous messages that were sent.

In addition to adding an edit history, iMessages can now only be edited a total of five times before the "Edit" option disappears, but there's still a 15 minute window for making an edit.

As noted by Bloomberg's Mark Gurman, the Edit history can be avoided by unsending an iMessage and resending it, but Apple has also implemented an Undo Send limitation. You're now only able to unsend an iMessage for up to two minutes after it's delivered, down from the original 15 minute timing.

It is worth noting that Undo Send and Edit are limited to iOS 16 devices, and the original messages are displayed on devices running iOS 15 or earlier.

Article Link: Edited iMessages in iOS 16 Now Display Original Text, Undo Send Limited to Two Minutes
FFFFAAAACCCCKKKK See proofreading volume 1 page 295.
 
Can we at least get a scheduled message feature like email did? That would be more useful than all this nonsense.

There already is an edit and unsend feature built into our skulls and thumbs. It’s called proofread and think twice before you hit send.
 
So people who are abused have a record of the abuse.
Exactly.

Also let’s be clear, edit isn’t meant to let you take back things you wish you hadn’t said. Apple isn’t here to supplement someone’s lack of self control. It’s there to help you fix typos or wrong directions or what have you.

Also, how dark is it that some people openly thumbs downed your comment?
 
Also let’s be clear, edit isn’t meant to let you take back things you wish you hadn’t said. Apple isn’t here to supplement someone’s lack of self control. It’s there to help you fix typos or wrong directions or what have you.

Well said. I'm starting to understand apple's view now, which I believe is exactly as you stated.
 
  • Like
Reactions: KPK102 and 1557750
I generally dislike the idea of editing sent messages. Not only it creates a window for abuse/harassment, it really teaches people to not think before they type.

I remember the days when we only had SMS, and it was charged per message. Meaning it cost money per message you sent. Information was more concise and efficient. Now, with unlimited text and free text over data, people are texting willy nilly since there's no cost to them.
 
  • Like
Reactions: compwiz1202
If apple used the phrase "and iMessage users can publicly edit their messages" or something like that, it would have put things in a diff context from the start.

Or something like that.
 
Exactly.

Also let’s be clear, edit isn’t meant to let you take back things you wish you hadn’t said. Apple isn’t here to supplement someone’s lack of self control. It’s there to help you fix typos or wrong directions or what have you.

Also, how dark is it that some people openly thumbs downed your comment?

Yes...but what is the feature/benefit here?

Me: Ok let's meet at 5pm
Me: Ok let's meet at 15:00 (Edit)

As opposed to:

Me: Ok let's meet at 5pm
Me: *15:00 👍🏼

What am I missing? Do I need another coffee?
 
  • Like
Reactions: flofixer
Replace this example with a different one.
Imagine you just started at a new job.
Your new boss sends you a message:
“Would you like a *insert sexually explicit phrase*”
You reply: “Absolutely not”
But right after you hit send, your boss changes their original message to say:
“Would you like a raise?”
And since the original message is gone, you’ve got nothing to show HR that your boss is a creep.
Now, if they edit the message you can still view and report the creep, and if they unsend, it’s not going to look so good on them.
Someone earlier in this thread asked if people would use these features to do this kind of stuff.
Yes, yes they will, and it’s already a problem on other messaging platforms with “edit” and “unsend” features
It goes both ways though, no? If the boss changed the message, simply screenshot it first and then you can edit your message as well to say yes to the raise. :D

And for unsend, you can also unsend your replies to the unsent message, no?
 
  • Like
Reactions: xpxp2002
This is probably because some idiots expressed their concern that these "features could be used for nefarious purposes."


This sucks. So the vast majority of us who wouldn't engage in nefarious actions with these new features have to pay the price for the actions of the very small percentage of people who would do bad things.

WhatsApp offers disappearing messages, couldn't those be used for "nefarious" purposes? Why are those allowed?

Besides, if a person sends someone an evil text, all that the recipient has to do is screenshot it and they can keep that to show to the police! Duh!

Now with this edit history being sent along with the edited text, the feature just looks ridiculous. They might as well get rid of it completely.

BTW, I don't care how many people dislike my comment. So go ahead and press thumbs down until your fingers are sore.
 
What's the point of having an "Edit" option if it's going to show the original text?

Apple should give users permission to add that feature into the messages app. Otherwise, it should not show the user has made any changes by default.
I couldn't agree with you more!

The small percentage of people who think they might be abused can turn a "Receive Edit History with Edited iMessages" toggle on. The rest of us who don't need this can leave this toggle set to off and enjoy the benefit of true edited iMessages.
 
What is Apple doing?

As long as the message is unread, you should be able to edit it without history. And as long as a message is unread, you should be able to unsend it until it's read.

Is it because you could determine if someone had read your message without read receipts turned on?

This seems more complicated than it should be.

I hate you all.
I love you all.

I think you all are okay.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Jony Five
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.