Why is Musk attacking Apple? They do not have competing business's. I wonder if he isn't getting his way in some deal.. <jk> 
And I hope that you will have alot of fun driving them, to each his own.Which is fine. Meanwhile we'll continue to enjoy the best cars in the world![]()
he is trying to get people who antagonize apple to buy his stock through renewed goodwill. Or even to get apple shareholders to funnel their gains into $tesla. Shrewd businessman, no mensh though.Why is Musk attacking Apple? They do not have competing business's. I wonder if he isn't getting his way in some deal.. <jk>![]()
Comparing using Tesla chargers for other brands (a good thing) is backwards: ask Musk if he’s okay with Tesla owners charging their cars on anyone’s chargers, rather than the other way around.
and that's why vern lost the defamation lawsuitDoesn't matter.
Act like a 12 year old, get taken as serious as a 12 year old.....
We can only hope that the 20's will be the decade werein we will finally witness the renaissance of open source
That's the difference between open source solutions and free labour to fix tools in open beta (edit: I have no clue of what I'm talking about.)*for consumer tech. It's funny, the same people and companies telling us what a fail open source tech would be are the same entities building their proprietary software off the back of open source tech (PyTorch, Linux, programming languages and their associated open source libraries, etc.)
Apple Maps is poop though. I'm driving on the free flowing freeway cities away from my destination and it keeps directing me to take surface street so instead of 20 minutes it'll be >1 hour drive.
"high level criminal manipulation"
sounds like you get your news from Tesla shorts.
That's the difference between open source solutions and free labour to fix tools in open beta (edit: I have no clue of what I'm talking about.)
Nothing here is factually incorrect nor based on flawed logic. It is always acceptable to target success for no other reason than revenge for not being equally successful. When other people have more it’s acquired through deceit whereas the redistribution of their wealth is fair until someone uses it to also be successful. The only strategy is to burn all excess crops else you risk being purged as well. Fairness is when everyone worries just a little bit that they may starve. Wealth is thievery. Victory is failure. Freedom is slavery and ignorance is strength. Peace in our times.It’s a tax. If you want to deliver an app to the 40% of the US that uses the iPhone, you must pay the tax.
Businesses have no choice. That’s anti-competitive, because they can’t go to someone else if they want to reach that portion of the population.
Walled gardens decrease competition, raise prices, and ultimately result in slower advancement of technology. They are not good and we shouldn’t defend them.
You mean as a double diamond member.Cryptocurrency is one of the greatest pyramid schemes of all time. I say that as an early advocate. I still believe the fundamental technology (blockchain in particular) is ground breaking and will be extremely useful going forward but the pumping and dumping of useless coins is the sort of financial trickery people used to be put in jail for.
Cryptocurrency is one of the greatest pyramid schemes of all time. I say that as an early advocate. I still believe the fundamental technology (blockchain in particular) is ground breaking and will be extremely useful going forward but the pumping and dumping of useless coins is the sort of financial trickery people used to be put in jail for.
Says the guy who promotes crypto scams that have high volatility, high level criminal manipulation, high carbon footprint, high fees, high level of scams.
I would say more but politics not allowed and I got suspended for it accidentally a few times. All I can say is that Musk and friends are highly unhinged people and if you know their agenda then you’ll vomit and how people could conspire to commit so much evil.
fact is, Intel has had a gross margin of ~ 55% for well over a decade - so, Apple is not allowed that for the App Store?The amount of money they make from the App Store is not anywhere in the same galaxy as "eating the cost" which is why people complain about the extortionate 30%.
Agreed.
Tim Cook should respond like: "Apple does not respond to persons of interest who may soon be imprisoned at the behest of the SEC. Cough cough.... Musk."
Elon, we’ll talk when you take that cross-country full self-driving coast to coast trip you wer going to take about a year after I bought one of your vehicles (like 2017ish). and when you fix my unresponsive radio controls. Or remember the hidden WiFi network I use after a reboot. Or how about when the only thing preventing me from having full self-driving (since I already paid for it up front with full knowledge of it low probability of happening) is regulatory approval? Harder than you thought? Will it happen before the end-of-life for my vehicle even given I had my last one (and still do) for 33 years before I purchased yours as my hopefully “last vehicle”?
Don’t get me wrong, I like my Tesla, but it does have “issues.” And your loudmouthing about things you know nothing about like a hyper loop transport dowasn’t make it better. Nor sending a Tesla into orbit (although I’ll give you that at least you didn’t send yourself.
I also like my Apple stuff, but there’s a lot I would like different or better. Grass is always greener on the other side.
I would say Elon has visionary moments. I would say Tim Cook for the most part how to do his job as CEO and shut up.
That could be one case, I myself refered to the tools as simply being devices to make you work with them within a certain framework.I see what you mean. Like companies that 'open source' parts of their product to get people to fix things for them meanwhile the fundamental product they're building is still closed source/proprietary in nature.
And a bargain for what’s rendered.Its a fee for services rendered not a tax.