Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Cryptocurrency is one of the greatest pyramid schemes of all time. I say that as an early advocate. I still believe the fundamental technology (blockchain in particular) is ground breaking and will be extremely useful going forward but the pumping and dumping of useless coins is the sort of financial trickery people used to be put in jail for.
Tesla didn't pump and dump. If they did, they completely missed the dump step as they still hold about 90% of their initial bitcoin purchase even after announcing that they would stop accepting Bitcoin.
 
The only thing I'm hoping for is that ANONYMOUS will continue going after Elon and his big mouth. Anon can put Elon in his place..... he is truly scared of them, as they are far smarter than him, not to mention they are not afraid to use nefarious tactics to ruin important people or billion-dollar corporations.

Elon knows that (even with his billions) he cannot easily counter or attack Anon, due to their decentralized and amorphous nature.


AnonElon_1024x1024.jpg
 
Omg Elon shut the whole **** up good lord. Are you good yet? With your billions?!? For the love of Christ get a f**** hobby!
I refuse to listen to a man who calls his child “X Æ A-Xii” or take him seriously in general. He’s not mentally well and there need to stop being news articles every time he babbles out even more incoherence.
I'm interested in your opinion regarding men who give birth and breast-feed their babies. 🧔‍♀️
 
Musk has turned into a complete clown with his commentary.

A genius that shouldn’t talk so much.
 
Epic wants to be able to sell direct to their own customers.
(You know - like Amazon does on iOS? -- and many others)

I doubt they expect they'd be able to run through the Apple store without any costs at all. What they are doing is posturing a certain way to try to enact change.

It gets hard to understand when people are making legal arguments, as that shapes things in a way that isn't always what people honestly know or expect things might turn out like.

They have to make arguments a certain way to try to get a result they like and new direction pushed for.
No, that’s not the entire story. Epic lawsuit says what they want is to have its own store that they can run on the Apple’s devices, and offer apps from other developers there as well. But I think the reality with Epic is that they really just wanted to pay a lower percentage to Apple and unfortunately Apple was not budging. Just like Google didn’t budge. They also needed some PR because their big volume app is no longer generating the revenue it once did, so this court case and tweeting that proceeded it, provided them a way to at least seem relevant for longer, and maybe help bring in additional revenue.

I’m guessing you’ve never either worked for a retailer or a manufacturer of products sold to retail, to understand that every reseller of product marks up a manufacturer’s wholesale price to cover all sorts of costs. And manufacturer’s don’t get a say in what that markup is. If a Walmart wants to sell a product for a loss, because it will get more people in the door, that’s their right. They can also mark the product up 35%, 50%, 65%, whatever they want that allows them to sell as many products as they can while being competitive in the market. Epic has made tons of money from sales of their apps through the App Store, so there is zero argument that they need a court to provide relief from Apple’s onerous (standard in the market) payment expectations.
 
Elon Musk is the man helping us to a new future. Doesn’t mean he is always right and here his criticism are basic nonsense you can read on any message board.
 
  • Like
Reactions: peanuts_of_pathos
Epic lawsuit says what they want is to have its own store that they can run on the Apple’s devices, and offer apps from other developers there as well.

Isn't that what I said?
They want to to sell to their own customers

(Just like Amazon and others on iOS do by the way)

The rest of your comparisons to brick & mortar operations are mostly moot here

It's very fair to argue for a way to pay for access to (and for) iOS users, but that doesn't try to take 30% of all transactions.

That fee structure is way out of whack, as costs to Apple don't scale linearly like that in the digital realm.
 
No, that’s not the entire story. Epic lawsuit says what they want is to have its own store that they can run on the Apple’s devices, and offer apps from other developers there as well. But I think the reality with Epic is that they really just wanted to pay a lower percentage to Apple and unfortunately Apple was not budging. Just like Google didn’t budge. They also needed some PR because their big volume app is no longer generating the revenue it once did, so this court case and tweeting that proceeded it, provided them a way to at least seem relevant for longer, and maybe help bring in additional revenue.

I’m guessing you’ve never either worked for a retailer or a manufacturer of products sold to retail, to understand that every reseller of product marks up a manufacturer’s wholesale price to cover all sorts of costs. And manufacturer’s don’t get a say in what that markup is. If a Walmart wants to sell a product for a loss, because it will get more people in the door, that’s their right. They can also mark the product up 35%, 50%, 65%, whatever they want that allows them to sell as many products as they can while being competitive in the market. Epic has made tons of money from sales of their apps through the App Store, so there is zero argument that they need a court to provide relief from Apple’s onerous (standard in the market) payment expectations.
The biggest issue to come of the epic lawsuit was when Apple was prevented from delisting all apps that used unreal. That decision by the judge was inherently biased as it revoked a right Apple should have about managing its own store.
 
Elon Musk is the man helping us to a new future. Doesn’t mean he is always right and here his criticism are basic nonsense you can read on any message board.
You can't really object with the man's vision, even if his defeatism about earth is a trait that I do not share (with space-colonization being an Ideological stepping stone to world government instead of a special imperative in my eyes ).

As for the man himself, I do dislike the self aggrandizing advertisement and the monopoly on social media attention he holds.

Not to mention the shady business practices.

But that's just what it takes to survive in the late-capitalism.
 
  • Like
Reactions: peanuts_of_pathos
I'm interested in your opinion regarding men who give birth and breast-feed their babies. 🧔‍♀️
I mean if they figure out a way to implant a working uterus and ability to breastfeed then I’m all for it. It’ll make a lot of people very happy. It’ll probably have to be strictly C-sec though because men don’t naturally have the hips for it.

although now that I’ve finished typing that I’m not sure how that’s relevant but thanks? 😂
 
I mean if they figure out a way to implant a working uterus and ability to breastfeed then I’m all for it. It’ll make a lot of people very happy. It’ll probably have to be strictly C-sec though because men don’t naturally have the hips for it.

although now that I’ve finished typing that I’m not sure how that’s relevant but thanks? 😂
He was trying to bait you into discussing identity politics
 
I mean if they figure out a way to implant a working uterus and ability to breastfeed then I’m all for it. It’ll make a lot of people very happy. It’ll probably have to be strictly C-sec though because men don’t naturally have the hips for it.

although now that I’ve finished typing that I’m not sure how that’s relevant but thanks? 😂
Thanks. I appreciate your support. I'm due in 6 weeks. All natural
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.