Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Why are people who worship a party that is emulating the Nazi’s so obsessed with China? Especially when they are an authoritarian nation just like all the others Republicans support?

There’s a boogie man hiding in every shadow according to the right, so obsessed with conspiracies and pushing their agenda down our throats that they fail to realize what they’ve become.
The Nazis used the power of the state to “other” those they hated, and they co-opted private industry, as well. Definitely sounds like what one party is doing, but I’m not sure it’s the party you have in mind…
 
Since you are unbiased, can you name some left wing fascists?
You use "unbiased" like something of a mocking slur. My point is that "left" and "right" don't have any meaning. It's what people (and governments) do that can be called fascism. Using left and right implies that there are things that are specific to the terms.
 
The right doesnt like free speech either. They were the ones complaining about rap music etc. now they want to pretend they support free speech. LMAO. 😂🤣🤣🤣

They were banning books in libraries a few months ago. The right is just mad that the center left is the ones who is banning them from doxxing people and sending out veiled death threats and other harrassment of individuals. 🤔

The right and the apologizers just dont like it when they are censored. Elon regularly bans people who criticize or make fun of him. So… free speech only matters when its his speech being impacted.
Incorrect!
 
I'm well aware but unless they did something ON THE PLATFORM TO VIOLATE THE RULES they are allowed on it.

Just like for all you know I've killed 20 people, eaten 8 of them had a criminal record longer than Shaq is tall. Unless I've broken MacRumors TOS I'm allowed on here still. Thats how things work.

Yeah except that's not how things work. Twitters terms of service:

"There is no place on Twitter for violent organizations, including terrorist organizations, violent extremist groups, or individuals who affiliate with and promote their illicit activities. The violence that these groups engage in and/or promote jeopardizes the physical safety and well-being of those targeted. Our assessments under this policy are informed by national and international terrorism designations, as well as our violent extremist group and violent organizations criteria."

But again, doesn't impact twitter employees directly so tweet away as long as you don't tweet out "He let's go kill some people today!" So while you live in your bubble of safety and worry about what politician is going to set you off and upset you, there are extremist groups allowed to tweet because they haven't said anything mean to someone in their tweets. Makes sense.
 
I don't think he wanted Twitter to fail in the beginning, but I'm positive he wants to tank it now after he realised how managing robots is so different to managing people. He just doesn't want to be seen to be actively tanking it.
He wants to be seen as reasonable while everybody else is unreasonable, and I think that he thinks that is the Status Quo.
 
Musk keeps on doing his best drunk uncle at the holidays impression.

You can have your platform and whatever rules about speech you want. Why is Apple or any other company required to advertise on it? That's not what free speech means at all, you bloviating pile of gas.

Musk isn't seeking any requirement to advertise; go see Elon's discussion on Apple's antics against open and fair discussion on Twitter which is exactly what this is about.

But hey, hew the party line, Comrade. 🤣

"This is a battle for the future of civilization. If free speech is lost even in America, tyranny is all that lies ahead."

- Elon Musk

 
Worth noting that if Apple were to ban Twitter from the App Store, it would 100% need to ban Reddit also. Both of them have “questionable” content.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DMG35
Twitter was and is a cesspool (IMO). I gave it up a long time ago, and recent developments confirm I made the right decision to move on from it.

Best thing that could happen is to let it rot on the vine, dig up the roots and get rid of it.
 
I don’t see anyone here arguing in favor of hate speech. The problem actually boils down to the definition of hate speech. And for a lot of people it means “opinion that differs than mine”.
You keep making claims that you fail to backup. This is not a mainstream view in any way. This whole thing wouldn’t even be a problem in the first place if the same folks claiming they don’t support hate speech weren’t also frequently the same folks spouting transphobic rhetoric.
 
Last edited:
Musk isn't seeking any requirement to advertise; go see Elon's discussion on Apple's antics against open and fair discussion on Twitter which is exactly what this is about.

But hey, hew the party line, Comrade. 🤣

"This is a battle for the future of civilization. If free speech is lost even in America, tyranny is all that lies ahead."

- Elon Musk

The first amendment isn’t in danger of going anywhere. However, if nobody wants to associate with you or give you a platform because of your odious views, then that’s on you.
 
  • Like
Reactions: CapitalIdea
No, there is a clear definition of hate speech. I would suggest looking it up if someone doesn’t understand the meaning.

The point he is trying to make is actually identifying where the line is drawn when interpreting speech. Policing speech accurately and fairly is no simple matter. You do understand that’s the point right?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sedulous
What if it was leaked to Tim Apple that Elon Musk was about to make public all communications with government to censor certain people on Twitter.

Would that bother apple loyalists?

Maybe, just maybe this is what the 'ban Twitter from the apple app store' is all about. Just maybe. It does make sense, though.

What if it's not about Free Speech but Censorship? There's such a vested interest in the term 'misinformation' and it has worked to great effect they must keep going with it tagged to 'Free Speech' and not mention it's really, truly censorship.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sedulous
The hysteria and Musk bashing is pathetic. You realize the Twitter TOS are unchanged? Even if an unbanned user returns and breaks that TOS, they will again be back in Twitter jail. This is nothing more than the usual cabal of crybullies and entrenched elites manipulating the public to turn against Musk. Think for yourself.

ssshhh. Get out of here with your common sense. Don't you know it doesn't belong here!


/s
 
  • Like
Reactions: CosmoCopus
But it's what it is. I'm not making US-based legal claims, just saying what it is for a vast majority of the users.
I'd say you are purposely distorting what it is to support your argument. What it actually is for all users is a private platform.

Maybe the algorithm favours right wing amplification because the right wing is funnier and more viral at the moment. That comes in cycles. Algorithms happening to amplify one kind of content is different to a shadowy cabal of elites coopting a platform in order to covertly censor one side of politics.
Strange juxtaposition of conspiracy theories there! If it favors right wing, it's just for innocent reasons. But if you perceive it to favor left wing, it's a "shadowy cabal of elites". Give me a break.

The survey method is simple and deliberate. A *binary* choice between 2 juxtaposed options means when these ideas are opposing, which one takes precedence.

One group answers it is relatively *more important* for an expression to be safe/welcoming, than to be free.

When theres a book or media that an idea that is unsafe/unwelcoming, which group is more in favor of suppressing it?

Doesnt take advanced logic to see the answer right there in front of you.
Again, the questions say nothing about suppressing content. You're just making that up. If I say rainbows are more important to me than unicorns, it doesn't mean I want to suppress unicorns. Unicorns could be the second most important thing in the world to me.

The real life book bans are coming from the right.
 
Last edited:
Yeah makes sense. We don't like the owner of Twitter and we don't like free speech so lets stop all iOS users using the application because we don't like it. Nice Apple.
 
Worth noting that if Apple were to ban Twitter from the App Store, it would 100% need to ban Reddit also. Both of them have “questionable” content.

100%. Reddit is worse honestly. But that isn't garnering headlines and Twitter has celebrities and politicians up in arms so the "Social Justice Warrior" thing to do right now is to stop doing business with Twitter.
 
The first amendment isn’t in danger of going anywhere. However, if nobody wants to associate with you or give you a platform because of your odious views, then that’s on you.

Odious views? Oh, you must mean this development which didn't make the MR story:

"The Twitter Files on free speech suppression soon to be published on Twitter itself. The public deserves to know what really happened …" - Elon Musk.


No worries, it's just a little free speech revelations coming out which TC/Apple want to stop.
 
  • Like
Reactions: webbuzz
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.