As usual, silence. He is a self made billionaire as I said.Show me evidence that he isn't a self made billionaire. Go ahead, I'm waiting to see it. How did he become a billionaire, oh wise ones?
As usual, silence. He is a self made billionaire as I said.Show me evidence that he isn't a self made billionaire. Go ahead, I'm waiting to see it. How did he become a billionaire, oh wise ones?
As usual silence. You have yet to show one fact to back up your many claims. Just one. Come on, you’re so well informed, as you claim. You must have an abundance of facts to back op your ramblings.As usual, silence. He is a self made billionaire as I said.
Twitter's sin is that it is owned by a man who said he would vote for someone other than a democrat. That isn't allowed! The people that claim to love democracy actually hate it.Balenciaga on the app store. No threat to take it off.
TikTok on the app store. No threat to take it off.
Twitter. Well, you know, can't have FREE SPEECH now, can we? Or is it misinformation? Or censorship? Yes, censorship.
Ah yes another one that comes up with a Balenciaga app. Which one though, nobody knows.Balenciaga on the app store. No threat to take it off.
TikTok on the app store. No threat to take it off.
Twitter. Well, you know, can't have FREE SPEECH now, can we? Or is it misinformation? Or censorship? Yes, censorship.
If we're going to criticize Apple for following China's laws for the sake of doing business there, then hey I'm game. But let's make sure we're looking at all parties involved in such things.So "Apple was just following orders" is an acceptable response to you?
How do we know what is at risk of being banned, as Apple doesn't talk about private matters like this one...Balenciaga on the app store. No threat to take it off.
TikTok on the app store. No threat to take it off.
Twitter. Well, you know, can't have FREE SPEECH now, can we? Or is it misinformation? Or censorship? Yes, censorship.
They believe the word of their God, Elon Musk. He cannot lie, so if he says Apple threatened to remove Twitter, it must be so.How do we know what is at risk of being banned, as Apple doesn't talk about private matters like this one...
What exactly do you think this comment means? Some form or another of this drivel is regurgitated over and over as if it means something. So what if there is no legal obligation? That is not the final measure of anything. Free speech is a universal concept that drove the inclusion of it in the founding if this country. It doesn't merely manifest out of a document. It is something decent people believe in. If you actively work against free speech in some way, you deserve whatever flak you get.
- I don't know that Apple cares about their Twitter accounts. That's the whole point of Elon throwing a tantrum, remember?
- Nothing on Twitter or in the App Store is "legally protected free speech". They're private platforms. The only thing your free speech is legally protected from in the US is the government interfering. Private companies and platforms have no legal obligation to grant you freedom of speech.
The people that claim to love democracy actually hate it.
You can speak all you want. You don't get to use my resources to do so. Free speech is not an absolute, neither in law nor in philosophical concept.What exactly do you think this comment means? Some form or another of this drivel is regurgitated over and over as if it means something. So what if there is no legal obligation? That is not the final measure of anything. Free speech is a universal concept that drove the inclusion of it in the founding if this country. It doesn't merely manifest out of a document. It is something decent people believe in. If you actively work against free speech in some way, you deserve whatever flak you get.
I don't have to agree with it to say yes of course it should be allowed. Doesn't bother me in the least. And by allowing it, it will ensure that other more important speech is not also silenced under the guise of protection from "hate" speech. I despise that term, frankly. It is just another buzz word used to silence and stifle.Also, is the garbage that nick fuentes spews hate speech or free speech? How many of you think this kind of word vomit should be allowed on twitter?
![]()
Can't forget this doozy. Nick Fuentes is everything the far right accuses the left of being and then some.Also, is the garbage that nick fuentes spews hate speech or free speech? How many of you think this kind of word vomit should be allowed on twitter?
![]()
At the very least it was whining and complaining about the way others choose to make use of their speech.
Observation and whining are not mutually exclusive. It can be both.Yeah, sorry that wasn't it... Free speech the hell out of it, I don't care, was merely pointing out what happens. You sound like a typical user of Reddit. I am surprised you haven't tried to give me the downvote. I mean, god forbid someone points out how stuff is done.
Observation and whining are not mutually exclusive. It can be both.
I don't have to agree with it to say yes of course it should be allowed.
Doesn't bother me in the least.
I despise that term, frankly. It is just another buzz word used to silence and stifle.
Well it is allowed under the first amendment, but people here don't understand what that really means. Does it mean that twitter should allow it? Isn't that up to them? I mean, I wouldn't want to amplify that trash if it were up to me and it were my company. I'm betting companies like apple and the like don't want to be associated with that garbage either. Yet here we are arguing over 'free speech' when it matters not when it comes to platforms like twitter. They get to decide what is allowed and the simple fact is that musk is bring back actual nazis so they can post hate. Advertisers will go elsewhere.I don't have to agree with it to say yes of course it should be allowed. Doesn't bother me in the least. And by allowing it, it will ensure that other more important speech is not also silenced under the guise of protection from "hate" speech. I despise that term, frankly. It is just another buzz word used to silence and stifle.
Some of us are capable of using context clues. How about calling it a crap show and falsely claiming that your comments will get removed regardless of what subreddit you're in? Go post that there are only two genders in r/conservative and be rewarded with many upvotes.Sure... what ever you say. I mean, looking back at my post, I probably used the words such as "unfair" or better yet, "I don't like that and they shouldn't do that as it hurts my feelings".
In the first quarter, Apple was the top advertiser on Twitter, spending $48 million on ads on the social network, according to a document reviewed by The Washington Post that was compiled from internal Twitter data. Apple’s spending accounted for more than 4 percent of Twitter’s revenue that quarter.
Some of us are capable of using context clues. How about calling it a crap show and falsely claiming that your comments will get removed regardless of what subreddit you're in? Go post that there are only two genders in r/conservative and be rewarded with many upvotes.