Musk faces a huge challenge in finding a free market solution that will cover Twitter’s enormous debt payments. Perhaps the first best step is to move Twitter out of California.
Burn and censor in the name of racism, homophobia, xenophobia, transphobia. It’s really sad where we’re at right now. Culturally bankrupt at the moment. And social media mainstream media has played a major role by creating echo chambers and gas lightning them.
Musk faces a huge challenge in finding a free market solution that will cover Twitter’s enormous debt payments. Perhaps the first best step is to move Twitter out of California.
And over to Saudi Arabia, who is now the most significant non-Musk owner.Musk faces a huge challenge in finding a free market solution that will cover Twitter’s enormous debt payments. Perhaps the first best step is to move Twitter out of California.
Yep, the net is littered with remains of things like Parler, Truth, Gab, VKontakt.I'm guessing that if Twitter allows racist, threatening and insulting language to become the norm on the site, people of good character (and advertisers) will leave the site in droves, leaving it just another parlor and truth. I'm sure Musk knows this, so all these people who want to "let it all hang out" will be hugely disappointed.
And over to Saudi Arabia, who is now the most significant non-Musk owner.
There is no asterisk by the word freedom.
WV will even toss in their hot cousin-sister for free.I wonder if Elon Musk could buy a state. West Virginia or North Dakota might not be very expensive.
Is it supposed to be the opposite of the "be/live in the moment"?I wonder if he is going to use Twitter to push the “Longtermism” philosophy he subscribes to.
I really don’t know much about it, I just recently watched this video by physicist Sabine Hossenfelder. Something about sacrificing people living today for the future of humanity a billion years into the future.Is it supposed to be the opposite of the "be/live in the moment"?
Life expectancy is substantially worse in Republican controlled states and the gap is growing. The Fentanyl disaster started with weak regulation from federal government enabling a major pharmaceutical company, Purdue, to abuse the system with opioid pain killers and get people hooked, and then with politicians of both parties in the states and federal government failing to take a leaf out of Margaret Thatcher's playbook and weaning people off using methadone. As for the border, the Biden administration is stopping far more people at it than Trump ever did. As for the "world" issues, Climate change? Better do something now if you don't want massive sea level rise burying our coasts or ever more unpredictable weather wrecking our Farm Belt. Green energy? Independence from foreign oil and monopolistic utilities with geothermal and solar generation that I control myself or along with my condo association, yes. Sign me up. Other countries' citizens being happy? Sometimes it helps to have allies, I'll just say that.Do Democrats care more about national issues - declining life expectancy, ballooning drug deaths and an open border, skyrocketing energy prices - or do they care more about global issues - climate change, green energy, other countries' citizens? Pretty clearly, it's the latter that they are interested in. Democrats would prefer that those who are not part of the bicoastal technocrat elite drop dead.
I wonder if Elon Musk could buy a state. West Virginia or North Dakota might not be very expensive.
Life expectancy is substantially worse in Republican controlled states and the gap is growing.
That explains why he keeps producing kids with replaceable women one after another.I wonder if he is going to use Twitter to push the “Longtermism” philosophy he subscribes to.
Those states are funding ******** red states and maybe one day they’ll just say they’ve had enough.We die earlier because after watching what’s going on in Democratically controlled states we want to.
I’m actually excited to see Twitter crash and cost Elon Musk billions.
There's also a question of what is "kind and considerate." Sometimes the truth hurts. Is allowing falsehood just to protect the feelings of people really "kind?" How do we define kind? We need an objective standard for what kind is and appeal to majority and appeal to emotions are both fallacies and don't give you a grounding for justified ethical claims. But the very thing that gives you a grounding for ethics and morals is not being broadcasted due to a desire to protect the false idea of what "freedom" is. What people call freedom is really slavery to the passions but people want this, and that's why they try to prevent the truth from spreading. They call good evil and evil good.Just like I deleted FB years ago for their practices, I deleted my Twitter account yesterday as I have no interest in participating in a forum where people think they should be expressing their hate for others, because it’s free speech. I don’t mean this as a political statement, but rather my desire for people to be kind and considerate humans.
Just another variation of the "greens". Whatever "fairly legitimate" racket you can come up with that will put you in charge and helps you to control and dominate complex social systems.I really don’t know much about it, I just recently watched this video by physicist Sabine Hossenfelder. Something about sacrificing people living today for the future of humanity a billion years into the future.