Apple only have 25% of the Global Mobile Market, and only 18% of the Global Desktop Market, how is that monopoly abuse?
I just saw 45% US market share. That’s large enough to qualify for antitrust.
Apple only have 25% of the Global Mobile Market, and only 18% of the Global Desktop Market, how is that monopoly abuse?
I’m not sure they have much of a case to dictate how Apple should operate an Apple product.
This is a complaint with the European Union, not the US.I just saw 45% US market share. That’s large enough to qualify for antitrust.
Monopoly = the exclusive possession or control of the supply of or trade in a commodity or service. iOS has a paltry 26% market share of the smartphone market in the EU, I would hardly characterize that as a monopoly.It’s a typical monopoly abuse situation. Developers have no choice but to develop for the Apple platforms if they want to survive. And Apple abuses that fact by asking unreasonably high fees.
Telegram’s main audience appears to be cyber criminals and extremists.
Funny to hear some of the capitalists bemoan capitalism.
That option would be permenantly turned off for me. I like my walled garden.
It is like every component maker, developer tool makers, hardware makers start playing the game of charging ransom of every developer transaction because in reality all are being used, served and supported.Just like you don't have to pay to deliver software on a PC or Mac. I've already paid quite a bit for my iPhones and iPads, I don't see myself as property of Apple that they can gatekeep access to.
Interesting how companies want to use Apple's platform but not pay Apple any fees.
like Telegram.You may not realize this, but there are thousands upon thousands of free apps on the app store that Apple doesn't get any money from.
I’m not sure they have much of a case to dictate how Apple should operate an Apple product.
More desperate attempts at money grabs at the expense of privacy and security. No 3rd party apps on my device thank you.
Want to swim in an ocean of sharks, use Android.
Absurd claim and counter to consumers rights to safety from malicious software - the commission should fine them for wasting its time.
Apple is facing another antitrust complaint in Europe, this time from the developers of encrypted messenger app Telegram.
![]()
In a complaint to the EU Commission, the app's creators argue that Apple must give iOS users the opportunity to download software outside of the App Store. The Financial Times reports:
According to the paywalled report, Telegram's complaint recounted how in 2016 it was prevented from launching a gaming platform on the App Store because it was deemed to violate Apple's rules. Telegram subsequently dismantled the venture to avoid "being deleted from the App Store," and claimed that it was "an example of Apple's capacity to curb innovation thanks to its 'monpolistic power' on the app market."
The complaint follows a blog post earlier this week by Telegram founder Pavel Durov in which he takes Apple to task and lists seven "myths" that the company uses to justify its 30 percent commission on apps hosted in the App Store.
Telegram is the third company after Spotify and Rakuten to formally complain to the EU Commission, which is already conducting two investigations into Apple's App Store and Apple Pay.
This antitrust complaint is separate to the ongoing U.S. antitrust current investigation. On Wednesday, Apple CEO Tim Cook defended the company's App Store policies in a congressional hearing.
Article Link: Encrypted Messaging App Telegram Files Antitrust Complaint Against Apple With EU
It’s a typical monopoly abuse situation. Developers have no choice but to develop for the Apple platforms if they want to survive. And Apple abuses that fact by asking unreasonably high fees.
Apple only have 25% of the Global Mobile Market, and only 18% of the Global Desktop Market, how is that monopoly abuse?
Macs allow apps to be downloaded using the browser, why can’t the iPhone?
Absurd claim and counter to consumers rights to safety from malicious software - the commission should fine them for wasting its time.
come a future version on MacOS on ARM i predict that the mac will go the way of the IOS not the other way round.
So basically they want the iPhone/iPad to become the Mac. 🙂I guessed as much. It’s really about each developer resenting the level of control Apple exerts over its ecosystem and wanting the liberty to be able to do whatever they want.
As a developer, I don't entirely get this. I have the choice whether I want to develop for iOS/macOS or not. It's not like anyone *has* to develop for iOS, they can choose to just have their app on android/windows/as a web app.
The fact is, developers are already making a lot more money on iOS as a platform since iOS users are more likely to actually pay for apps and in-app purchases...
I do not want the added security risk of having alternative app stores/sideloading.
Besides, where do we draw the line? Is it anti-consumer that we can't install Android on our iPhones, too? Should we be able to more easily jailbreak iOS devices? Set default apps for everything, customize every single bit of the OS?
In my opinion, absolutely not. The stability and simplicity of iOS is what makes it special.
So iOS is the platform not the App Store? On the Mac you’re not limited to the MAS. Or do you think all apps on the Mac Should have to go through an Apple store too?This makes no sense. The complaint is that they want to use the platform (iOS) but bypass going through Apple.
That depends of how you break down the monopoly term. They don’t have a global device sales monopoly, but a monopoly on their platform.Apple only have 25% of the Global Mobile Market, and only 18% of the Global Desktop Market, how is that monopoly abuse?
You would feel very comfortable in the old DDR.I'm dreaming a day of a Mac app store Only. One source for all the apps: no website, no torrents, no strange site with ads and stupid things. Only one place with huge wall of protections.
Customers are stupid so you need to protect them and the only way to do so it's to allow only certain type of app from a specific place.
It’s a typical monopoly abuse situation. Developers have no choice but to develop for the Apple platforms if they want to survive. And Apple abuses that fact by asking unreasonably high fees.
Treat one one way, treat the other a different way.So iOS is the platform not the App Store? On the Mac you’re not limited to the MAS. Or do you think all apps on the Mac Should have to go through an Apple store too?