Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
That's nonsense. I bought an iPhone 6 Plus the day they came out and realized in about 5 minutes flat that it sucked as a tablet. The aspect ratio was wrong, web browsing in landscape sucked, gaming sucked, (*sucked compared to a mini) pretty much all tablet specific features sucked.

The mini is absolutely a great device with so many size specific use cases, whether it's portability for commuters, a pocketable tablet, perfect size for drone pilots to mount on the drone remote, aircraft pilots to put on a kneeboard or yolk mount, in bed reading / viewing, on and on and on.

Yeah any one of these use cases is "niche", but when you see comment after comment with people all saying the same thing: "I use the mini for X because anything bigger is too big and anything smaller sucks".

That’s because you bought a phablet not a tablet. I think the Plus phones are fantastic! In fact I find myself going to my iPad less and less since I bought the 7 Plus. The only thing I don’t like is that it is almost too big for my pocket. Hopefully the X Plus will solve this problem.
 
My nieces go iPads specifically because (then) new chips/etc are more likely to remain useful and supported in 3-4 years than the nearly 4 year old chips in the iPad mini. And the larger screens will be more useful for schoolwork. Brother-in-law started out intending to get them iPad minis but quickly changed his mind when he realized those two points.

I agree - I've had kids, nieces, nephews that used iPad minis in the past, but whenever I had someone ask (for children) which iPad to go for I always suggest the 9.7" iPad (since the 5th gen launched in 2017). Regularly updated, good price, nice screen size for general use. Very easy decision now (even more so since seeing the clearer lineup of iPad and iPad Pro).
 
  • Like
Reactions: CarlJ
Can’t imagine much spec difference between MB12 and new 13. Maybe better ports. Also, if in September would have to think along side next iPhone launch event

Regular i5 even with a sub 2.0Ghz clock is still much stronger than core m. It wouldn’t be a monster but at that price it was never going to be.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Wags
That’s because you bought a phablet not a tablet. I think the Plus phones are fantastic! In fact I find myself going to my iPad less and less since I bought the 7 Plus. The only thing I don’t like is that it is almost too big for my pocket. Hopefully the X Plus will solve this problem.

I felt the same thing during the year that I was using a 7 Plus. I don't think the X Plus will solve that pocket-ability problem for you, but the X definitely could.
 
Doctors loved the iPad Mini. What most people didn't see was that the size of the iPad Mini fit perfectly in the lab coat pocket. My sister told me that everyone in her residency had one. My dad carried one on his patients rounds. I don't understand why they would drop that size. Not everyone wants a full sized iPad or iPad Pro.
 
If Apple releases a USB-C to lightning cable, can I use the 67 watt Macbook Pro power adapter to charge my iPad?
 
I felt the same thing during the year that I was using a 7 Plus. I don't think the X Plus will solve that pocket-ability problem for you, but the X definitely could.

Yeah, the X feels exactly like a 6 or 7 in the hand just a little bit longer. The reason why I passed on it was because I didn’t want to lose the extra real estate the Plus has but I may have no choice is the X Plus is too big.

I would’ve been happy with the 6.1” LCD 9 or X whatever they call it but it doesn’t have the dual lens and that is a deal breaker. I can’t go back to not having portrait mode after using it for almost two years.
[doublepost=1534528350][/doublepost]
If Apple releases a USB-C to lightning cable, can I use the 67 watt Macbook Pro power adapter to charge my iPad?

Yes you can! It already exists! I bought one to charge my phone when I bought the MBP in late 2016.
[doublepost=1534528508][/doublepost]
$150 for a wireless charging "mat"? My Samsung wireless charger cost only $25.00. Is there something about the Apple version which would justify a $150 price?

Yes there is. Apple is designed in California and Assembled in China. Samsung isn’t designed in America!
[doublepost=1534528642][/doublepost]
I have a mini 2 that is showing its age. I also am on my second plus sized phone and still prefer a mini iPad over a full sized one.

If they aren’t going to replace the mini, I am more inclined to get a budget priced laptop with a real keyboard over a larger sized iPad. At least with a full computer I can download photos from my cameras and edit them, or type coherently. And for the sand relative price as an iPad Pro (or less).

My Air 1 is showing its age too even though the battery is still in fantastic shape. I never really used it that much. Supposedly performance for A7 devices will be improved a lot with iOS 12 but either way that will be the end of the road for Apple’s first 64-bit ARM CPU.
[doublepost=1534528751][/doublepost]I fear this will be the end of the iconic illuminated Apple logo. Those who want it for a couple of more years should buy a fully loaded Air right now before they’re gone forever or a 2015 13” which is still a much better machine.
 
$150 for a wireless charging "mat"? My Samsung wireless charger cost only $25.00. Is there something about the Apple version which would justify a $150 price?
It can charge up to three devices at the same time (though their might be asterisks as to what combination of devices is possible). And it can charge both the Apple Watch and standard Qi devices (standard Qi charging devices cannot charge the Apple Watch). One could in theory argue that it is thus worth three charging mats (with one of them being the more expensive, since requiring certification from Apple, Apple Watch charging mat). It might also allow a much more casual placement of the devices being charged (don't remember the precise details on this or how much was actually said on that topic).

Whether that justifies $150, is another question.
[doublepost=1534528904][/doublepost]
Interesting that we are pretty deep into 2018 and there has not been much new Mac Pro talk or rumors.
Probably because the new Mac Pro is a 2019 product as Apple announced several months ago.
 
  • Like
Reactions: CarlJ
The fact that Apple still can’t make a sub $1000 retina MacBook Air or MacBook is pretty laughable.

iBooks and MacBooks (non-Pro) used to start at $999 years ago. That's a fact which your comment is overlooking

Apple _could_ make a sub-$1000 laptop, but they prefer to have a healthy profit margin instead. Mac laptops are very different from your average PC laptop.
 
Expect the numb keyboard-from-Hell pulled from the MBP. I'd bet $100 on it. No way will Apple retreat on that horrible stage-prop of a keyboard. That's admitting defeat and Jony Ive doesn't make mistakes.

I just bought the current MBA so I don't lose useful ports and a nice keyboard. Retina? Who cares?
 
if the 13 inch macbook really is going to be the new entry level macbook they most likely will kill the 12 inch model

this makes sense as there would be no need or reason for a 12 inch and 13 inch macbook to coexist, even if there were performance differences

so 1,200 bucks might well gonna be the cheapest ticket to enter the Mac universe
 
No need for a mini. People just need to wait few more years till Apple reaches the size of a mini on an iPhone. Judging by the current trend we will hit mini format in about 2 years.
Goddamit Apple, stop with the nonsense.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Jg75 and Gudi
Regular i5 even with a sub 2.0Ghz clock is still much stronger than core m. It wouldn’t be a monster but at that price it was never going to be.
Is rumored processor duel core? Was speaking of potential use of 12 and new 13. Would expect the about the same and about same target market.
 
iPhone 9
iPhone X
iPhone X plus
IPad Pro 11
IPad Pro 12.9
Apple Watch series 4
AirPods 2.0
Apple Pencil 2.0
AirPower
MacBook
iMac
18 watt power brick

Plus all the fall cases, watch bands, and Ipad covers...


Have I missed anything.

They won’t introduce everything in September, they will split it with the October event
 
Is rumored processor duel core? Was speaking of potential use of 12 and new 13. Would expect the about the same and about same target market.

That’s what I believe. If they are going to use Kaby Lake it will be dual. I don’t know if they will use Kaby Lake or Kaby Lake Refresh. The former is in the 13” base MBP right now. The latter has slower clock speeds but 2 extra cores. The catch is that the GPU is not Iris and much much worse.
 
I think if they planned on keeping the non-touchbar model around, they would have refreshed it to the new keyboard and processors a month or so ago when they upgraded the TouchBar 13" and 15" models.
Which new processors? There are no 15-W TDP Coffee Lake processors yet (there is a 15-W TDP '8th-gen' Kaby Lake R processor but it only comes with an inferior graphic processor than what is in the 2017 nTB MBP).
 
That wouldn't be a bad name for a slightly refreshed version of the current MBA. View attachment 776459

Apple producing a single device in each category (phone, tablet, notebook, Mac, etc.) with the "SE" philosophy would keep me in the fold. I loved the value of the iPhone SE, and am thoroughly enjoying the 2018 iPad. I wouldn't mind too much replacing my 4+ yr old 11" MBA for a new 13" Macbook SE-badged MBA.

You're right in line with my thinking...

There appears to a bit of an underworld of us who preferred a variety of the previous gen/other ideology products that are a market to be had. I'm totally in love with my SE and have zero - zero - interest in what they are making right now for iPhones (other than the SE) and the design choices and tradeoffs they keep making across most all the products.

It's seriously frustrating.
 
  • Like
Reactions: sracer
Is Apple the richest company in the world? I know they hit the trillion dollar value because of stock price but Walmart, among like 8 or so other companies, still make way more per year. Forbes still list Amazon ahead of Apple. However, I do agree with your point.
Depends on how you define 'richest'. Largest revenue? Largest profits? Largest cash-on-hand pile?
 
  • Like
Reactions: RevTEG
Apple usually adds this moniker to the last model in a range as a sendoff

What a "sendoff" it would be if they did little else to the MBA beyond a final edition with a Retina screen!

That could be my machine for the next 7 years.
 
  • Like
Reactions: FFR
"Apple doesn't need to sell low-priced laptops"

Yes they do. The more users Apple has, the more subscribers they will get for their services which are recurring charges and have higher profit margins. Services are already bringing almost as much money as both Macs and iPads combined. Looking at the trend, services are bringing more money every quarter so it would make sense for Apple to sell an inexpensive, low-cost laptop.

Bring out a $499-$599 entry level laptop (because they can, if they wanted to), and see how many new users they could acquire overnight!
 
  • Like
Reactions: Yvan256
Missing in the headline:


"...and no new MacMini either"
Such a shame when a company does everything it can to drive away it's own customers.

One MacBook Pro disaster after another, Mac Pro is...well....it's a trashcan.
One iPhone disaster after another...
Maybe next years Mac Pro will be a decent computer.
 
The thing that Apple calls „entry“ nowadays makes me question my salary lol

In an actual customer oriented world, they would just get rid of the MacBook Air and simply have a cheaper < 1.000$ entry MacBook and an MacBook Pro. Makes no sense to me to keep a 3rd option like an Air around. Even the iPad got the „iPad“ and the „iPad Pro“ Version just like the iPhone which should actually be called iPhone and „iPhone Pro“ in my opinion

Such a messy line up

they surely will clean up their messy line up

and they most certainly will make you pay for it
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.