Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Epic is fighting for the rights of all developers, not just themselves. It's for the little guy, the underdog making chump change while Apple is making 30% for doing nothing.

Epic does not speak for me as a developer nor many tens of thousands of others that thanks to the AppStore can well with little to no risk and with significantly less cost. Without the AppStore I might maybe see 30% of that sale instead of 70%. Epic want better terms for themselves and to be allowed to shoehorn in their own store.
 
But why are they not releasing it on MacOS? They don't have Fortnite in the Mac App Store! This whole thing is a non-issue on PC and Mac. Overly dramatic of Epic Games.

To play the sympathy card I guess?

This would be a great card to play if Epic did NOT want to support Mac anymore, Apple is taking our developers license so we're closing down the Epic Games Store for Macintosh. It's not "our fault"!
 
Last edited:
I guess some parents will see their "me" time drop like a lead balloon when their kids won't be glued for hours and hours to the screen of a device. Not to mention the inevitable whining because they can't play.
Kids are quite resilient. They’ll be off to the next thing, likely a big empty box, an interestingly shaped twig or, you know, an actual computer/console that still has the game on it. :)
 
Just to add, the rhetoric on this topic is changing. Now the dust has settled, people are beginning to see this for what it is. Epic is playing the petulant brat after taking the pre-meditated move to break Apple's T&C's.

The problem for them is the only loser is Epic. Lost revenue. Fewer gamers. And a dented reputation.

...and some gamers will simply find other Battle Royale games and never go back.
 
Apple is blocking Fortnite updates and new installs on the App Store, and has said they will terminate our ability to develop Fortnite for Apple devices. As a result, Fortnite’s newly released Chapter 2 - Season 4 update (v14.00), will not release on iOS and macOS on August 27.

If you still want to play Fortnite on Android, you can access the latest version of Fortnite from the Epic Games App for Android on Fortnite.com/Android or the Samsung Galaxy Store.

Couldn’t Apple sue for libel here? The statement is factually wrong, even the Judge said Epic could just resubmit the app without the ability for the second payment system and they wouldn’t get banned, and they could go on with the legal battle nonetheless. I think it would be an easy win for Apple, as you can easily prove Epic knew what they were writing was wrong. They’re playing games, and this move is pretty amateur. They’re not helping themselves.
 
Last edited:
Dumb. The people playing Fortnite won't be loyal to Epic, they'll just move on to whatever else is popular and stay there until there's something new. Likelihood of return to Fortnite even if/when the battle of wits is over will be pretty low.
 
I'm sure that Apple and Epic are getting a lot of emails about this, but I'm glad that Samsung now has the easiest marketing slam dunk against iPhones (aka playing Fortnite). Steve Jobs once noted that video games were one of the reasons why the Mac never outsold a PC, let's see if the gamer tides will turn for Samsung
 
Can't believe we still have people blatantly defending the trillion dollar company without even secondguessing their decision. I use and love Apple products every day, but when I see something bad or unethical, I'll call them out on their BS.

Epic is fighting for the rights of all developers, not just themselves. It's for the little guy, the underdog making chump change while Apple is making 30% for doing nothing.

Meanwhile Tim Cook just cashed out 265,000 shares and made over $140m ...

You guys do realize that Microsoft was sued and lost for having IE being the default browser in Windows. Apple's ecosystem is way more monopolistic in nature than Windows' was in 1995.

Epic counts essentially on this naive, and uniformed, world perspective. Epic doesn’t care about any ”underdogs” only about increasing their profits, the “little guys” as they themselves state several times, benefits from the Apple Store, they can be promoted at the same level of big labels despite not having the budget, for them not having to think about promotion, payment processing and so on and have all the visibility the App Store provides is good. It’s only for giants like Epic, that can afford to build and maintain their own stores and spend big money on promotion, that the App Store it’s not the ideal solution to maximize their profits as much as they can.

As for the Windows/iOS comparison, it’s clear you don’t know what you are talking about. IE wasn’t even the iceberg of MS monopolistic and anti competitive tactics. Study first, talk later.
 
Can't believe we still have people blatantly defending the trillion dollar company without even secondguessing their decision. I use and love Apple products every day, but when I see something bad or unethical, I'll call them out on their BS.

Epic is fighting for the rights of all developers, not just themselves. It's for the little guy, the underdog making chump change while Apple is making 30% for doing nothing.

Meanwhile Tim Cook just cashed out 265,000 shares and made over $140m ...

You guys do realize that Microsoft was sued and lost for having IE being the default browser in Windows. Apple's ecosystem is way more monopolistic in nature than Windows' was in 1995.
It is NOT unethical to enforce the terms of a contract that Epic has - deliberately and knowingly - violated. Can safely ignore the strawmen/non sequiturs here.

What do you - ethical businessperson - do when someone violates the terms of a contract that they entered into freely, fully understanding and agreeing to all its terms? Shrug, let them off because they're the little guy? Why shouldn't everyone you do business with treat contracts with you like toilet paper?

Doesn't matter what you think of Apple or what Microsoft did or what Tim Cook does with his shares... Epic are massively, deliberately in the wrong.
 
Epic is fighting for the rights of all developers, not just themselves. It's for the little guy, the underdog making chump change while Apple is making 30% for doing nothing.

What Epic isn't admitting: the price for a digital copy of a new console game is exactly the same as the price for a physical copy sold in a retail store DESPITE the fact that the cut for the digital store (30%) is actually much lower than the cut for the physical copy in a retail store (55%). That doesn't fit with Epic claiming that a lower cut = lower prices for consumers.
 
70% is not "chump change", devs can charge whatever they want to make their margins. If items are more expensive on iOS so be it, you would pay more for things at a high end grocer vs Costco but that is your choice.
Something I was thinking of earlier today... if someone were to approach me saying they wanted to enter into a business agreement with me (I need access to their market, they need my app) with revenue sharing and they STARTED the negotiation at 70/30 in my favor? I’d probably be signing before the words got out of their mouth.
 
Every kid I know plays on a console.

This is what most don't seem to understand. Console makes up over 90% of Fortnite usage. It's where they make the vast majority of their revenue. They're not at a big loss here.

They pay the same 30% to Microsoft, Sony, and Nintendo on console, that they do to Apple and Google on mobile.

There's a good reason they started their fight on mobile and that's because it's not a significant part of their revenue. If they lose the case, they're not out a lot. If they win, then they take that president to the console makers and bring the fight there. But you don't start by going after the guys that make up the majority of your revenue first. There's far less risk in going after the mobile platform folks and seeing how it plays out first.
 
What Epic isn't admitting: the price for a digital copy of a new console game is exactly the same as the price for a physical copy sold in a retail store DESPITE the fact that the cut for the digital store (30%) is actually much lower than the cut for the physical copy in a retail store (55%). That doesn't fit with Epic claiming that a lower cut = lower prices for consumers.

Regardless of the store cut, there is still a cost to manufactor, press, print etc. physical media. Digital is "cheaper" with the 30% cut and there is no old stock that gets discounted/returned for credit. Physical Media will all but be gone in the next few years.
 
  • Like
Reactions: WiseAJ
Players have to wait another month to see how court goes for this. Should be interesting. Epic must have done the math and decided that the risk/reward of potentially not having to pay the 30% cut is worth the nearly 2 million dollars they made in daily iOS in app purchases.
 
  • Like
Reactions: bayelrey80
From Epic:

'If you still want to play Fortnite on Android, you can access the latest version of Fortnite from the Epic Games App for Android on Fortnite.com/Android or the Samsung Galaxy Store.'

We are all also free to choose the following platforms, also supported by Fortnite:

MS Windows, Nintendo Switch, PS4, PS5, Xbox One, Xbox Series X

I hope the judge in this case takes a good long look at these platforms, fees and general terms & conditions. The market available to Epic for Fortnite is evidently not monopolistic.

F
 
Seriously with this crap again?

Epic is NOT fighting for all developers, they are fighting for themselves.

70% is not "chump change", devs can charge whatever they want to make their margins. If items are more expensive on iOS so be it, you would pay more for things at a high end grocer vs Costco but that is your choice.

Apple is not doing "nothing" they built and maintain the hardware, the OS, development tools, the ecosystem and the store. None of these things are a fixed cost, they evolve and have real, onging costs. Apple also funds all the "freemium" apps, without a commission on the IAPs they would get NOTHING from any free app, how would you suggest addressing that?

The Microsoft IE argument is the worst comparison yet, at that time Microsoft had a 90% stranglehold on the desktop computer OS, 2019 numbers show iOS phones are about 60% of the market.

The OS is paid by the customer and by Apple itself. The dev tools by Apple itself, Apple need it, it is an investment they HAVE to do, since it is what allows devs to make apps, which then makes iPhone successful. If Apple was not doing dev tools, there would be no apps, therefore, iPhone would not sell at all.


The store, well, Epic absolutely doesn't need the store at all. Apple forces them to have their app in the store. Epic has all the infrastructure needed, plus they need to spend extra just for the sake of Apple and its dictatorship.
I'm fine for having one single store, but then the rules need to be very broad and only security should count. Any subjective rule should be forbidden, because it is only protecting Apple's business and hurting customers and developers
If Apple still wants a store where they can choose which app can be there and which can't just depending their mood and their interpretation very wide of their own rule, then they have to open their store. If was ok to have such a system for some time. Now, it is time to open. Like any patent is limited in time to allow the company to make profit, the store allowed Apple to make their profit. Now enough of their censure. Many apps cannot be done just because of some stupid rule...
 
I'm a little confused about why it wouldn't be available on macOS - can't they distribute the update via Steam and/or their own Store and website? I understand it wouldn't be available via the macOS App Store...
 
  • Like
Reactions: ohmydays
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.