Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.


Couldn’t Apple sue for libel here? The statement is factually wrong, even the Judge said Epic could just resubmit the app without the ability for the second payment system and they wouldn’t get banned, and they could go on with the legal battle nonetheless. I think it would be an easy win for Apple, as you can easily prove Epic knew what they were writing was wrong. They’re playing games, and this move is pretty amateur. They’re not helping themselves.​

Would have to show that the false statement caused apple damage, which seems unlikely given that everyone knows the truth?
 
Epic believes that Apple's terms requiring Epic to give Apple 30% of income that Apple plays no part in Epic earning (Epic built the payment infrastructure, Epic hosts the servers that process the payment, Epic's marketing drives traffic to their app, and Epic would rather host the download of the app itself).

Apple takes 30% of the sale price, to provide a hosting and payment processing service, which multiple independent vendors have described as amounting to around 8% of the sale price when selling through non-Apple distribution (that's financial processing, hosting bandwidth etc).

The only way for Epic bring a case against Apple to change this, was to engineer a situation that was actionable. The idea that they would have achieved anything by "asking" Apple to change the deal, is laughable.

The fact that a contract contains terms, does not make those terms legally enforceable - see non-compete clauses for employment contracts in California.

It's worth bearing in mind, that Epic's Unreal engine is the basis of many, if not most of the games Apple pays to have developed for their Apple Arcade service, so the idea that they would yank Epic's Unreal developer account is ridiculous footbullet posturing on Apple's part.

wait apple collects 30 percent on microtransactions??
 
Regardless of the store cut, there is still a cost to manufactor, press, print etc. physical media.

That's the point: the savings for developers/publishers in the digital sales model wasn't passed along to customers. One of Epic's primary claims is that savings get passed to consumers, yet their biggest market for Fortnite doesn't work that way. Digital downloads on consoles are the same price as a physical copy for new games.
 
I'm a little confused about why it wouldn't be available on macOS - can't they distribute the update via Steam and/or their own Store and website? I understand it wouldn't be available via the macOS App Store...

Epic is an 8 year old taking their toys home. I'm sure MACOS is like, 2% of their base, but they are being dicks. The language they used will no doubt be brought up by the Apple Attorneys as it is factually incorrect. The judge will be piiiiiiised
 
What do you - ethical businessperson - do when someone violates the terms of a contract that they entered into freely, fully understanding and agreeing to all its terms? Shrug, let them off because they're the little guy? Why shouldn't everyone you do business with treat contracts with you like toilet paper?
Another thing Epic clearly hasn’t realized: when they showed they were willing to ignore a contract with Apple, they showed what they felt about agreements between companies... companies that, say, depend on them for tooling. I’d figure that a lot of those are looking for other solutions or even starting development on a backup in-house solution for Unreal. No matter how you look at this, Epic is going to be swatting at a few giants in the industry and a lot of these development houses don’t want to be stuck in the middle.
 
From Epic:

'If you still want to play Fortnite on Android, you can access the latest version of Fortnite from the Epic Games App for Android on Fortnite.com/Android or the Samsung Galaxy Store.'

We are all also free to choose the following platforms, also supported by Fortnite:

MS Windows, Nintendo Switch, PS4, PS5, Xbox One, Xbox Series X

I hope the judge in this case takes a good long look at these platforms, fees and general terms & conditions. The market available to Epic for Fortnite is evidently not monopolistic.

F

Every single one of those consoles also take a 30% cut. Sony, Microsoft, and Nintendo all do the exact same. But consoles make up over 90% of their revenue, so they don't want to start the fight there. If they lose to Apple and Google, they're not out much. If they win, then they'll have the confidence they need to take on the console makers and fight them on that cut too. They're making the low risk bet first.
[automerge]1598459206[/automerge]
I'm a little confused about why it wouldn't be available on macOS - can't they distribute the update via Steam and/or their own Store and website? I understand it wouldn't be available via the macOS App Store...

Purely out of spite. There's nothing Apple or anyone is doing them that'd prevent it from being on macOS at this point. It's simply a move to try to make Apple look bad in any way they can.
 
I imagine Epic is hoping that players on iOS and macOS will flood Tim Cook's inbox with pleas to allow Fortnite back into the App Store with their own IAP and that this will force Apple will cave and lift the Developer Ban.
 
While I feel sorry for everyone playing Fartnite on iOS its epic to blame for this, apple did nothing wrong here
 
That's the point: the savings for developers/publishers in the digital sales model wasn't passed along to customers. One of Epic's primary claims is that savings get passed to consumers, yet their biggest market for Fortnite doesn't work that way. Digital downloads on consoles are the same price as a physical copy for new games.

What savings? Do you think storage is free for Apple? Or daily updates? Access to hundreds of millions of customers?

Why does anything need to get "passed on"? Do developers do that? No.
 
If you have kids that play it a lot, probably not as good as before. I guess some parents will see their "me" time drop like a lead balloon when their kids won't be glued for hours and hours to the screen of a device. Not to mention the inevitable whining because they can't play.

Go OUTSIDE, the screen is much bigger and more interactive. Who wants to be held hostage by bratty children who THINK they HAVE to be playing on a electronic device to be entertained!?
 
I imagine Epic is hoping that players on iOS and macOS will flood Tim Cook's inbox with pleas to allow Fortnite back into the App Store with their own IAP and that this will force Apple will cave and lift the Developer Ban.
If that was the ONLY way to play it, they might be right to expect that. But low effort wins the day and with several ways to play it starting at $299, some they may already own AND the game being free to download, most will just shift to those other better platforms.
 
Dumb. The people playing Fortnite won't be loyal to Epic, they'll just move on to whatever else is popular and stay there until there's something new. Likelihood of return to Fortnite even if/when the battle of wits is over will be pretty low.

True but hopefully more companies, especially big names, will choose to abandon iOS and Apple altogether in protest. Eventually govt will step in.
 
What savings? Do you think storage is free for Apple? Or daily updates? Access to hundreds of millions of customers?

Why does anything need to get "passed on"? Do developers do that? No.

You're misinterpreting my posts. I'm criticizing Epic for false claims about developers/publishers passing savings on to customers. It obviously doesn't work that with consoles, which is Epic's largest market for Fortnite.
 
The OS is paid by the customer and by Apple itself.

"Apple Itself"? Silly comment, Apple pays for nothing itself, customers pay for everything. That's just as silly as saying the government pays for it and not the taxpayers.
The dev tools by Apple itself, Apple need it, it is an investment they HAVE to do, since it is what allows devs to make apps, which then makes iPhone successful. If Apple was not doing dev tools, there would be no apps, therefore, iPhone would not sell at all.

Also silly, see above, Apple doesn't pay for it, customers do, you have a strange sense of economics. They make the initial investment to build tools but that investment needs to be repaid and grown/maintained.
If Apple still wants a store where they can choose which app can be there and which can't just depending their mood and their interpretation very wide of their own rule, then they have to open their store.

Apple didn't remove Epic apps based on their "mood", Epic made the decision to willingly violate the agreement they made with Apple. Epic could have ridden out their contract and then attempted to renegotiate or just not do business with Apple, its really that simple and still is today.
Now enough of their censure. Many apps cannot be done just because of some stupid rule...

Please reference the many apps that cannot be "done" because of "some stupid rule" and also please define the stupid rule that is preventing these apps from existing.
 
They want to push their agenda and make it look like Apple are banning them from developing for macOS.
They are, though. The judge is allowing Apple to terminate the developer account associated with Fortnite, which is the account that breached the agreement. Presumably, Apple will do so on Friday as promised. The only thing Apple is forbidden from doing under the TRO is terminating other developer accounts associated with Epic Games or its affiliates that were not involved in the breach, which includes the Unreal Engine.
 
If that was the ONLY way to play it, they might be right to expect that. But low effort wins the day and with several ways to play it starting at $299, some they may already own AND the game being free to download, most will just shift to those other better platforms.

Yes, for those who have access to multiple platforms already they can just move over.

But for those who only have an iOS device (or an iOS device and a Mac), for example, would they buy a console (or a Windows PC) just to play? Yes, there is Boot Camp, but that has it's own caveats.

And arguably hoping iOS/macOS players put pressure on Apple to cave is itself a "low effort" move since it requires nothing from Epic. And it would explain why they also are denying macOS players access to the new Season when there is no financial or technical barrier to doing so (beyond Epic just being petty, which is counter-productive to their message that they are 'doing it for the players').

I don't know how much revenue Fortnite gets from iOS players, though I recall that it was at one time substantial. If it still is substantial, Epic will indeed be hoping people do move on to other platforms and continue spending that money.
 
how? epic violates their t&c's with apple, and apple blocks them. nothing wrong with that statement.

Like cmaier said, Epic can update the app all they want, so long they don’t continue violating the T&C. Regardless of the validity of the T&C, which will be assessed down the line in court, a Judge as already said Apple could enforce it for now, but that Epic has the ability to avoid being banned. It is their own decision to not offer an update that complies with the current T&C.

Would have to show that the false statement caused apple damage, which seems unlikely given that everyone knows the truth?

Might be hard to prove in absolute terms that it caused Apple damage. And clearly, even on here, some either ignore the truth, as you say, or misunderstand it. We can assume the millions of players who will see this message aren’t all interested in following the legal battle either, so based on Epic’s message alone, will side with Epic. There’s definitely a case to be argued here, and I’m sure Apple could find a few thousand Fortnite players who’ll gladly admit they switched platform because of it.
 
You can make games without Unreal Engine. And Unity isn't even remotely involved in this, nor is GameMaker or any other engine. Epic would do go on their customers to split the engine into a separate business if they are going to mess about with small developers incomes on their crusade for more profit.
I realize all that. I'm saying what if this becomes a trend and all these other engines take a stand. What good is iOS without apps?
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.