Are you sure you're not confusing this with Doctors Without Borders, or the American Medical Association? 🤔
Using Doctors Without Borders and the AMA in the same sentence is rather insulting toward Doctors without Borders.
Are you sure you're not confusing this with Doctors Without Borders, or the American Medical Association? 🤔
You greatly, greatly overestimate how thorough the App Store’s app review process is. Out of 13 releases of my app — including the first — on the App Store, only one spent more than two hours in review at 210 minutes. The fastest was 7 minutes, one of 3 releases that have been approved in under 15 minutes. Another 4 were approved in less than an hour, and another still came in just above at 63 minutes. One more was done in under 90 minutes.These companies won't be happy until there's other alternative "App Stores" that you could use...all with their bag of malware horrors that we see on Android now. Developers may even forego using Apple's app store and use some alternative app store...one that doesn't do testing of apps. One that doesn't look for malware or rely on some automated algorithm to do it (like Google's now), so then things slip by and we'll see headlines like we see on Android "App that was downloaded a million times was spying on blah blah blah". It happens all the time.
![]()
Alien Android Banking Trojan Sidesteps 2FA
A new 'fork' of the Cerberus banking trojan, called Alien, targets victims' credentials from more than 200 mobile apps, including Bank of America and Microsoft Outlook.threatpost.com
But hey, at least billion dollar companies like Epic won't get any fees charged to them, and that's much more important.
“Apple tax”. Is that similar to the 40-50% “Walmart tax” suppliers must pay to get onto the shelves of the US’s largest retailer?Like it or not, if you want a piece of the Apple pie (users) then you need to pay the Apple Tax.
It's very simple. If you don't, then you walk.
If you don't agree with the way Apple is running things, then you can stick to Android. The "market" will decide if they want to stick with Apple if Apple doesn't want to play nice.
My guess? Users aren't going anywhere. Apple has the perfect chokehold, and I agree with them.
Because one unites hippocratic Hippocrates and the other unites hypocritical Hippocrates?Using Doctors Without Borders and the AMA in the same sentence is rather insulting toward Doctors without Borders.![]()
Imagine Elon Musk taking 30% of what’s in your bank account every time you start your Tesla.Indeed (in some countries it is even more than that), but your boss gave you that job, he should have his well-deserved cut on your salary too because without him it would be zero. If more Apple fervent defenders had cool bosses taking that 30% cut, maybe they would see thing differently.
Imagine Elon Musk taking 30% of what’s in your bank account every time you start your Tesla.
Maybe that makes sense in “crazy, irrelevant, random-analogy” world but not here at MacRumors.
Yes, Apple should be paid for their work - but they shouldn't be paid for the work of others.
The amount of blind criticism goes the same way as the blind "fanboyism". The only thing Epic and the others care about is their wallets, after they made a mint from ios apps and then attempted to sabotage Apple. Epic and company are acting no better than the way you say Apple is acting.The amount of blind fanboyism in this thread is just hurting, as if this was a sports match with people cheering for their team. Regardless of ones stance on this topic, Apple is no ones friend here. The only people Apple cares about is their main stakeholders (plus all the minors ones, but only because they have to). Some people behave as if Apple would repay their blind loyalty in any way, despite this being never the case.
Besides that, there is two sides to every coin. And despite those same principles applying to the companies part of that coalition (namely, they only care about themselves), they do raise some valid point. Todays ecosystems, regardless of which form or nature, opened door to a lot of anticompetitive practices. As a customer, in a free market, you should care about yourself primarily, just like those companies do. Making eco systems less restrictive is customer friendly. That does not contradict an App Store which is selective about the software quality, there is ways to still achieve this in a more open eco system.
Yet that’s not good enough for Epic, they’re suing Google to force themselves onto the Play Store. For free lol.They can create their own AppStore on Google's platform. Not possible on Apple.
That’s my point. Neither was OPs!I am sorry but your analogy isn’t even apples to oranges.... it’s apples to dinosaurs.
not even close to relating.
Do you really think the path to a larger marketshare is to add more and trashier trash to the heap?
The amount of blind fanboyism in this thread is just hurting, as if this was a sports match with people cheering for their team. Regardless of ones stance on this topic, Apple is no ones friend here. The only people Apple cares about is their main stakeholders (plus all the minors ones, but only because they have to). Some people behave as if Apple would repay their blind loyalty in any way, despite this being never the case.
Imagine Elon Musk taking 30% of what’s in your bank account every time you start your Tesla.
Maybe that makes sense in “crazy, irrelevant, random-analogy” world but not here at MacRumors.
If Apple could do that it would only prove abuse of market power and that Apple needs to be regulated.Hahahahaha. So funny. Can't wait for Apple to crush these morons and put them out of business.
Think it was meant in a court of law.If Apple could do that it would only prove abuse of market power and that Apple needs to be regulated.
Congratulations! You played yourself.
He also thinks the value of full self driving is close to $100,000.That's a great idea. After all he keeps your Tesla secure with software updates and that costs money /s.
Possibly... but the article doesn't read like that's going to happen... it says "and aims to lead legal and regulatory changes with regards to what it says are three key issues". Which basically translates to lobbying.Think it was meant in a court of law.
Possibly. There still is a court case scheduled to start shortly though. Interesting the timing of this relative to the start of the court case.Possibly... but the article doesn't read like that's going to happen... it says "and aims to lead legal and regulatory changes with regards to what it says are three key issues". Which basically translates to lobbying.
Because the end of the day MR is a news site, they post the good and bad about Apple. Also this "whining" will only make the App Store better, if you see no issues with how Apple runs the App Store then you are blind. Apple was in a Anti Trust hearing about a month ago for a reason, they exploit developers and don't follow the same rules governed by everyone else.I really do wish sites like this one would quit giving these guys a megaphone. Why we continue to incentivize whining with increased exposure is beyond me.
Thats where the issue is, there is no freedom on the App Store. If Apple doesnt want your app in there it wont be, the very same thing that was said at the Anti Trust hearing about a month ago is the very same thing Apple did. You should listen to it, it's a very nice chuckle for a company that thinks because you put developers in a corner you have full control. Like it or not the App Store will see major changes in the next few years. The Court Case is pending now.These whiney bitches need to grow a pair and figure out how to compete on their own terms within the rules that are presented to them. I already have the 'freedom' to choose Spotify if I want to but I don't because their software is clunky and bloated with too many features.
Everyone? Epic charges 12%.
Things may change, change slightly or major changes may be involved, or things may not change for Apple in the way the app store operates. It depends how the court cases go.Thats where the issue is, there is no freedom on the App Store. If Apple doesnt want your app in there it wont be, the very same thing that was said at the Anti Trust hearing about a month ago is the very same thing Apple did. You should listen to it, it's a very nice chuckle for a company that thinks because you put developers in a corner you have full control. Like it or not the App Store will see major changes in the next few years. The Court Case is pending now.