Yeah they’ve had their panties in a wad for at least a couple years. Whatevs 🙄Spotify?...
Yeah they’ve had their panties in a wad for at least a couple years. Whatevs 🙄Spotify?...
I can see some valid criticism. For example, the fact that the Tile app has to be running in the background all the time, to be able to track location. I'll bet that won't be the case with AirTags.
Yeah they’ve had their panties in a wad for at least a couple years. Whatevs 🙄
Indeed, classic Apple fanboyism right here. I may not approve of all of the companies on this list, I utterly despise Tile for the constant nagging they do about features I don't need to use the product without their subscription, but a 30% cut for not strictly necessary functionality (CDN, notification backend, "marketing", IAP... these are all things developers can implement on their own dime) they force onto developers is ****ing insane, everyone should be able to see that to be frank.The tribalism being shown here is sad. One could not be blamed for thinking humans have not evolved at all after reading this thread.
Hypocritical to say the least. Should be free. That’s what they think they should pay AppleEveryone? Epic charges 12%.
I think that the 30% tax is their biggest issue. I have always thought it was too much. Surely at even 15%-20% Apple would still make a ton of money.
There are blatant mistruths on the App Fairness front page. For example, "For most purchases made within the App Store, Apple takes 30% of the purchase price. No other transaction fee — in any industry — comes close."
Let's list other companies that charge a similar fee for similar overhead: Google, Steam, Amazon, UberEats, Sony, Microsoft, Nintendo, GrubHub, eBay+PayPal, and the list goes on, I am sure.
In other words, you don’t know what the 30% covers.Indeed, classic Apple fanboyism right here. 30% cut for not strictly necessary functionality (CDN, notification backend, "marketing", IAP) they force onto developers is ****ing insane, everyone should be able to see that to be frank.
Everyone? Epic charges 12%.
Lmao.
So after reading through those ten points, basically, "We want to develop apps how we want, use your storefront how we want, and your rules shouldn't apply."
There's a term for this: freeloading.
These are companies. I have no loyalty. Give me a good product and a lower price and I’ll jump any time.View attachment 958603
Also, for what it's worth...
*Apple announces Apple One*
Me, to my wife: Sooo random question, but how married are you to Spotify in particu–
Her: We're not getting Apple Music.
Me: This new bundle is a great deal since we're already paying fo–
Her: Buy it yourself if you want it.
As reported on this site a few days ago, Epic has no right to complain, having been such a pain in the butt resources hog to Apple for so long. They got a bargain and should shut up. I can’t really address the other companies as to what their beefs are. But Epic has been a complete toddler.I think that the 30% tax is their biggest issue. I have always thought it was too much. Surely at even 15%-20% Apple would still make a ton of money.
This stuff is kind of amusing. You could maybe argue that 30% is too high, but Apple has their argument for charging this much as well. This feels like a losing battle to me though. Take your app off the App Store and see how well you do.
Surely a handful of customers don’t get to decide what Apple will charge.I think that the 30% tax is their biggest issue. I have always thought it was too much. Surely at even 15%-20% Apple would still make a ton of money.
Pretty sure I know who wrote this stuff, the CEO of ProtonMail. This guy is absolutely delusional. His public statements regarding Apple are insane.There are blatant mistruths on the App Fairness front page. For example, "For most purchases made within the App Store, Apple takes 30% of the purchase price. No other transaction fee — in any industry — comes close."
Let's list other companies that charge a similar fee for similar overhead: Google, Steam, Amazon, UberEats, Sony, Microsoft, Nintendo, GrubHub, eBay+PayPal, and the list goes on, I am sure.
Another example, "If consumers want to use a modern mobile device, Apple levies a tax that no one can avoid. No competition, no options, no recourse."
Unless the Apple tax now extends to the billions of Android phones out there, this is ridiculous on its face. While I content that Apple and it's ecosystem are superior (in large part due to the App Store and it's walled garden), to say that Android-based phones are not a modern mobile device and that Apple has no competition is being willfully ignorant, at best.
I think that the 30% tax is their biggest issue. I have always thought it was too much. Surely at even 15%-20% Apple would still make a ton of money.
So Apple should drop the 30% to 27-28% and let other credit card processors compete for the 2-3% payment processing fees?No, their biggest issue is Apple being the payments gatekeeper on the App Store.
The sheer arrogance of these companies is astounding. Can you imagine if this was a bricks and mortar store?
“Thanks for building and designing the shop, providing the shelving, and helping customers find our products, but we’d quite like to not to have to pay you anything for being here. We’ve also brought our own payment terminals and we think you should let us use all your wiring for free. I know you have a brand and think you can choose what you want to stock but we’ve made some decent money up to now and we don’t see why we should continue to behave like suppliers. No we won’t be giving you anything from the payments we take directly. In fact, rather than using your shop, it’s utilities and features for free, just give us permission to build our own shop on your car park, we’d like to use the same blueprints too. Thanks”.
There is zero real-world presidency for their App Store principle list that applies in any other competitive market. They need to get real.