Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Just here for the comments...
giphy.gif
 
I can see some valid criticism. For example, the fact that the Tile app has to be running in the background all the time, to be able to track location. I'll bet that won't be the case with AirTags.

I hear this complaint a lot. To me it means tile doesn’t have a complete product. It’s not a new issue so what have they don’t to solve this? As far as I can tell they have complained.
[automerge]1600958423[/automerge]
Yeah they’ve had their panties in a wad for at least a couple years. Whatevs 🙄

Also, they are owned by Tencent.
 
The tribalism being shown here is sad. One could not be blamed for thinking humans have not evolved at all after reading this thread.
Indeed, classic Apple fanboyism right here. I may not approve of all of the companies on this list, I utterly despise Tile for the constant nagging they do about features I don't need to use the product without their subscription, but a 30% cut for not strictly necessary functionality (CDN, notification backend, "marketing", IAP... these are all things developers can implement on their own dime) they force onto developers is ****ing insane, everyone should be able to see that to be frank.
 
I think that the 30% tax is their biggest issue. I have always thought it was too much. Surely at even 15%-20% Apple would still make a ton of money.

So Apple is an evil monopoly at 30%, but at 15% everything is hunky-dorey?

Look, I can agree 30% is a lot and some of these developers want to negotiate a better deal. But, the thing I can't stand the most is hypocrisy. These companies are dressing it up like some righteous battle against "greed" but in reality they are just trying to improve their own bottom line. At least be honest about it.
 
There are blatant mistruths on the App Fairness front page. For example, "For most purchases made within the App Store, Apple takes 30% of the purchase price. No other transaction fee — in any industry — comes close."

Let's list other companies that charge a similar fee for similar overhead: Google, Steam, Amazon, UberEats, Sony, Microsoft, Nintendo, GrubHub, eBay+PayPal, and the list goes on, I am sure.

Not to mention Epic game store itself. Epic is literally the last company to speak about "customer freedom" — they are the one's bribing game developers to get their games locked into Epic's distribution platform.
 
View attachment 958603

Also, for what it's worth...

*Apple announces Apple One*

Me, to my wife: Sooo random question, but how married are you to Spotify in particu–

Her: We're not getting Apple Music.

Me: This new bundle is a great deal since we're already paying fo–

Her: Buy it yourself if you want it.
These are companies. I have no loyalty. Give me a good product and a lower price and I’ll jump any time.
 
I think that the 30% tax is their biggest issue. I have always thought it was too much. Surely at even 15%-20% Apple would still make a ton of money.
As reported on this site a few days ago, Epic has no right to complain, having been such a pain in the butt resources hog to Apple for so long. They got a bargain and should shut up. I can’t really address the other companies as to what their beefs are. But Epic has been a complete toddler.
 
The sheer arrogance of these companies is astounding. Can you imagine if this was a bricks and mortar store?

“Thanks for building and designing the shop, providing the shelving, and helping customers find our products, but we’d quite like to not to have to pay you anything for being here. We’ve also brought our own payment terminals and we think you should let us use all your wiring for free. I know you have a brand and think you can choose what you want to stock but we’ve made some decent money up to now and we don’t see why we should continue to behave like suppliers. No we won’t be giving you anything from the payments we take directly. In fact, rather than using your shop, it’s utilities and features for free, just give us permission to build our own shop on your car park, we’d like to use the same blueprints too. Thanks”.

There is zero real-world precedence for their App Store principle list that applies in any other competitive market. They need to get real.
 
There are blatant mistruths on the App Fairness front page. For example, "For most purchases made within the App Store, Apple takes 30% of the purchase price. No other transaction fee — in any industry — comes close."

Let's list other companies that charge a similar fee for similar overhead: Google, Steam, Amazon, UberEats, Sony, Microsoft, Nintendo, GrubHub, eBay+PayPal, and the list goes on, I am sure.

Another example, "If consumers want to use a modern mobile device, Apple levies a tax that no one can avoid. No competition, no options, no recourse."

Unless the Apple tax now extends to the billions of Android phones out there, this is ridiculous on its face. While I content that Apple and it's ecosystem are superior (in large part due to the App Store and it's walled garden), to say that Android-based phones are not a modern mobile device and that Apple has no competition is being willfully ignorant, at best.
Pretty sure I know who wrote this stuff, the CEO of ProtonMail. This guy is absolutely delusional. His public statements regarding Apple are insane.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Stevez67
I think that the 30% tax is their biggest issue. I have always thought it was too much. Surely at even 15%-20% Apple would still make a ton of money.

I don't disagree. But this won't solve the fundamental problem. Let's say that Apple reduces the tax to 10%. But how would that prevent a company like Epic from claiming that it's still too much? As long as they can spin a convincing story (having million of underage customers who are easily manipulated helps), the actual tax amount doesn't matter much.
 
No, their biggest issue is Apple being the payments gatekeeper on the App Store.
So Apple should drop the 30% to 27-28% and let other credit card processors compete for the 2-3% payment processing fees?

Apple has the volume to offer very competitive rates for payment processing, good luck trying to undercut them.
 
  • Like
Reactions: FCX and Stevez67
The sheer arrogance of these companies is astounding. Can you imagine if this was a bricks and mortar store?

“Thanks for building and designing the shop, providing the shelving, and helping customers find our products, but we’d quite like to not to have to pay you anything for being here. We’ve also brought our own payment terminals and we think you should let us use all your wiring for free. I know you have a brand and think you can choose what you want to stock but we’ve made some decent money up to now and we don’t see why we should continue to behave like suppliers. No we won’t be giving you anything from the payments we take directly. In fact, rather than using your shop, it’s utilities and features for free, just give us permission to build our own shop on your car park, we’d like to use the same blueprints too. Thanks”.

There is zero real-world presidency for their App Store principle list that applies in any other competitive market. They need to get real.

AT&T, Verizon and T-mobile should start asking Apple for 30% of their revenue, you would be OK with that right? I mean, they build it and Apple is leeching of them.
 
That reminds me, must delete epic games account... done! Haven’t touched it in ages, only had free games, didn’t give any of my real info because I didn’t trust them. their store didn’t do developers any good from my lack of purchasing. Spent lots more in Apple App Store.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.