Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
sorry but i've watched posts about this for months. if not years.

its never about one app getting a little exemption.

IT'S ABOUT BREAKING THE APPLE APPSTORE.

loading content that is pirated is a lot different to apps that are pirated.
you know that.

you admit there are two choices ... so pick the one that you know lets you do all you want to do.
it's easy. it's cheap. it's readily available so why not just buy an Android device?

i have even asked what apps people who advocate breaking the store want to load.

some wishy washy "wifi checkers" or "Windows emulators".

the percent of iOS users who want that is close to 0.
both these functions can either be done on Android now or better still, a laptop, even a Mac laptop.

iOS was designed to be different to desktop OSes.

it was designed to make a consumer device less of a nerd toy.

and most non-tech users have great success because they are protected from doing lots of silly things.
not 100% fool proof but pretty close to it.

Spotify are not shining a light on anything. Nor are Epic.
No they are not shining lights but what they are doing is bringing Apple’s business strategy from behind closed doors into the public
That is why governments are regulating them & are currently investigating their policies
That is why Tim Sweeney is confident that epic will be back on the USA iOS app store
Sooner or later
 
I think your mistaking here wbeasley
If Spotify for example can offer payment links then my understanding is they can now offer promotions on iOS & that wasn’t allowed before unless you think that’s a bad thing for customers?

Nobody is advocating for free/priated apps on iOS however if epic launched their App Store on iOS how would that actually affect iOS when customers would be giving more of a choice unless you are against that

You do you understand that you can watch things for Free/pirated content on iOS already?

Now if your gripe is with epic then fine
However the reason why governments & companies are taking Apple to court & by enforcing legislation is because of how the smartphone industry is setup in the west that you only have 2 choices of companies to pick from.

In regards to epic crying hard now certain people may think that however what them & Spotify are doing is essentially shining a big torch on how Apple run their business behind close doors and are bringing out in the open so that is why more than likely epic will be back on iOS App Store in the USA
Spotify isnt going to offer discounts or cheaper prices.

it works quite well currently with a free app download and sign into you account that you created outside and put you payment details into your profile.

is there one single person who thinks Spotify is going to see phenomenal growth if they are allowed to direct app users to a payment system from within the app? Really? anyone???

the whole outside account thing worked for the Spotify account I had (and stopped).
it works for Microsoft and Netflix and Prime.
Theses are all much bigger companies... doing quite well the way the AppStore works now.
 
Not really, but whatever.
As has been said already, they were banned for a reason and it should remain that way.
They were banned for not complying with a system that the courts have now found to be illegal. I could be fired for refusing to return half my wages to my employer in the form of kickbacks and I would have been fired “for a reason,” but it’s a bad reason and it’s illegal, so surely that counts for something.
IF Apple allows the app then they will have no chance to win that appeal imho, so my guess is: not happening
You do realize that Apple has been referred for potential criminal contempt charges, with one executive lying under oath and others potentially implicated by internal documents intentionally withheld by Apple under false claims of privilege, right? I know this is Mac Rumors and there’s a strong contingent here that feels that Apple is the second-coming of John Galt, but considering that Phil Schiller voiced concerns that Apple’s actions may be illegal and now Alex Roman may literally be headed to jail, are you really sure Tim & company are going to continue to allow their actions to be dictated by a petty grudge against Tim Sweeney and strategic calculations about how fully complying with a lower court order will look on appeal?
 
Spotify isnt going to offer discounts or cheaper prices.

it works quite well currently with a free app download and sign into you account that you created outside and put you payment details into your profile.

is there one single person who thinks Spotify is going to see phenomenal growth if they are allowed to direct app users to a payment system from within the app? Really? anyone???

the whole outside account thing worked for the Spotify account I had (and stopped).
it works for Microsoft and Netflix and Prime.
Theses are all much bigger companies... doing quite well the way the AppStore works now.
it’s not about cheaper prices for Spotify for example
It’s more likely this by offering a payment link they then can offer a customer a free promotion and then that is designed to hook the customer in if they like the product and now they can offer that within the iOS app
In the USA iOS App Store

The difference is this can all be done within every iOS app going forward
That is why Apple doesn’t want it because it will hurt IAP
 
Anyone think we at the bottom of the pile “customers” will end up covering these costs in the end?
 
They were banned for not complying with a system that the courts have now found to be illegal. I could be fired for refusing to return half my wages to my employer in the form of kickbacks and I would have been fired “for a reason,” but it’s a bad reason and it’s illegal, so surely that counts for something.
The system wasn’t found to be illegal. In fact, the courts ruled that the system was legal! Epic was in the wrong, Apple was within its rights to ban them, Apple wasn’t a monopoly, didn’t have to allow alternate app stores, and Epic owed Apple 30% of the revenue Epic got for cheating.

The judge interpreted California law to say one rule in that system wasn’t allowed. California courts disagree with her on that. But even if she’s right about her interpretation, the system wasn’t illegal.

You do realize that Apple has been referred for potential criminal contempt charges, with one executive lying under oath and others potentially implicated by internal documents intentionally withheld by Apple under false claims of privilege, right? I know this is Mac Rumors and there’s a strong contingent here that feels that Apple is the second-coming of John Galt, but considering that Phil Schiller voiced concerns that Apple’s actions may be illegal and now Alex Roman may literally be headed to jail, are you really sure Tim & company are going to continue to allow their actions to be dictated by a petty grudge against Tim Sweeney and strategic calculations about how fully complying with a lower court order will look on appeal?

Nothing in the lower court order said “let Epic back in the App Store.” It said the opposite, actually. And given Apple’s request for an injunction of the most recent order states that one of the reasons it should be granted is that “Epic isn’t on the App Store, and so won’t be harmed by the appeals court granting a stay”, I seriously doubt Apple will let them back in until that is resolved, at the very least.
 
it’s not about cheaper prices for Spotify for example
It’s more likely this by offering a payment link they then can offer a customer a free promotion and then that is designed to hook the customer in if they like the product and now they can offer that within the iOS app
In the USA iOS App Store

The difference is this can all be done within every iOS app going forward
That is why Apple doesn’t want it because it will hurt IAP
If Apple make no money from the AppStore then why run it?
Why provide tools for free?

Why allow anyone to create a Dev Account for $99 a year (fairly modest) and then let them submit apps that you use resouces to check and then allow users to download if you get nothing from doing that? And handle the marketing and payments and refunds and auto updates...

Perhaps the supermarket should just stock products like milk and you scan a code on the carton and pay the supplier directly? Supermarkets shouldnt be making money. They didnt make the milk. The milk producer should be able to offer customer a better price or coupon to keep them.

it's like people dont get that Apple is a for profit company.
and has been for decades.
 
You are right, anyone saying that doesn't understand computer... it was told by a$$le: https://www.wired.com/2012/06/mac-viruses/
I didn’t see anywhere in that article where Apple says Macs don’t get viruses. Maybe read the article again?
https://www.wired.com/2012/06/mac-viruses/
At some point I have to go to their webpage? It's my dream! I hope it will happen soon, I don't want to use "a store"... I'm not a kid, I don't need them... let's get rid of the store asap...
it sounds like you would be more happy with an a$$droid phone. I suspect you already have an android phone unless you’re a glutton for punishment.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Jumpthesnark
The system wasn’t found to be illegal. In fact, the courts ruled that the system was legal! Epic was in the wrong, Apple was within its rights to ban them, Apple wasn’t a monopoly, didn’t have to allow alternate app stores, and Epic owed Apple 30% of the revenue Epic got for cheating.

The judge interpreted California law to say one rule in that system wasn’t allowed. California courts disagree with her on that. But even if she’s right about her interpretation, the system wasn’t illegal.



Nothing in the lower court order said “let Epic back in the App Store.” It said the opposite, actually. And given Apple’s request for an injunction of the most recent order states that one of the reasons it should be granted is that “Epic isn’t on the App Store, and so won’t be harmed by the appeals court granting a stay”, I seriously doubt Apple will let them back in until that is resolved, at the very least.
it’s not about finding that Apple is a monopoly or not

it’s not about that Apple being required to put epic on the USA IOS App Store or not
It’s they will end up doing it sooner or later

Just think about it
Not from an Apple fans perspective
But what business practice has been alleged towards Apple
That is why he’s confident about getting back on
 
If Apple make no money from the AppStore then why run it?
Why provide tools for free?

Why allow anyone to create a Dev Account for $99 a year (fairly modest) and then let them submit apps that you use resouces to check and then allow users to download if you get nothing from doing that? And handle the marketing and payments and refunds and auto updates...

Perhaps the supermarket should just stock products like milk and you scan a code on the carton and pay the supplier directly? Supermarkets shouldnt be making money. They didnt make the milk. The milk producer should be able to offer customer a better price or coupon to keep them.

it's like people dont get that Apple is a for profit company.
and has been for decades.
I never said Apple doesn’t make money from the app store or shouldn’t make money from the app store not once

So are you saying that the USA IOS App Store is designed like the supermarket model?

Nobody is saying that Apple can’t make profits not even Tim Sweeney says that
 
So now Spotify is a scummy company why is that 🤔

Again it will not make good business sense in the long run to not allow epic back on the
USA iOS App Store
No good will come of it business wise long term
The company that Spotify is hasnt changed. And what happens to epic in the long term in the US still remains to be seen.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Naraxus
No they are not shining lights but what they are doing is bringing Apple’s business strategy from behind closed doors into the public
That is why governments are regulating them & are currently investigating their policies
That is why Tim Sweeney is confident that epic will be back on the USA iOS app store
Sooner or later
Apples business strategy is sound, even if you are against it. This is not the right thread to go into a debate about the why of regulation, however what happens to Eoic remains to be seen.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Naraxus
Yeah Apple in fact wanted to ban epics EU account and then when EU regulators started looking into Apple suddenly they allowed their EU developer account that’s what happened.
Because the same laws that would be acceptable in the US unfortunately wouldn’t fly in the eu. Even if the eu app had fleeced customers, Apple probably couldn’t have Banned them. Bad for consumer.
And what light did it shine on epic’s business practices?
What have they done it’s so bad?

If Apple as some claim will win this appeal then there should be no issue whatsoever by putting epic back on the iOS App Store
Unless you think that they shouldn’t be allowed back on because they challenged Apple
If Apple will win this appeal, epic will be gone.

As the famous yogi Berra once said: “it’s not over till it’s over.”
 
Apples business strategy is sound, even if you are against it. This is not the right thread to go into a debate about the why of regulation, however what happens to Eoic remains to be seen.
If Apple’s business strategy is sound then epic will have no issues whatsoever going back on the USA ios App Store
 
Apple has filed an emergency motion with the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals to pause the "extraordinary" ruling that it argues requires it to give up "core aspects of its business operations." Apple has specifically asked the appeals court to allow it to charge fees for purchases made using external links while the appeals process is playing out, with the company also requesting control over how those links are displayed.
That's like Al Capone asking the judge to allow his racketeering organization to continue to do business because racketeering/extorsion are "core aspects of its business operations".
 
IF Apple allows the app then they will have no chance to win that appeal imho, so my guess is: not happening
Even leaving the appeal aside, why would they allow it? It’s obvious they won’t get any money out of it. So what do they have to win? The court order has nothing to do with this topic so they are in no obligation to allow them.
 
They were banned for not complying with a system that the courts have now found to be illegal. I could be fired for refusing to return half my wages to my employer in the form of kickbacks and I would have been fired “for a reason,” but it’s a bad reason and it’s illegal, so surely that counts for something.

You do realize that Apple has been referred for potential criminal contempt charges, with one executive lying under oath and others potentially implicated by internal documents intentionally withheld by Apple under false claims of privilege, right? I know this is Mac Rumors and there’s a strong contingent here that feels that Apple is the second-coming of John Galt, but considering that Phil Schiller voiced concerns that Apple’s actions may be illegal and now Alex Roman may literally be headed to jail, are you really sure Tim & company are going to continue to allow their actions to be dictated by a petty grudge against Tim Sweeney and strategic calculations about how fully complying with a lower court order will look on appeal?
I don’t see anything wrong with them blocking Epic. They violated their agreement, the fact that now the judge rules apple a monopoly doesn’t change what Epic did.
 
Since when does it matter on MR that one has to use a company’s products to be critical?
I’m not saying that nobody can be critical of things however the things some are critical of just so happens to be companies that have taking Apple to court or part of current government investigation

It makes perfect sense when epic are allowed back on the USA iOS App Store because then it would take away a particular point away from the conversation
 
I don’t see anything wrong with them blocking Epic. They violated their agreement, the fact that now the judge rules apple a monopoly doesn’t change what Epic did.
Apple wasn’t ruled a monopoly.
I’m not saying that nobody can be critical of things however the things some are critical of just so happens to be companies that have taking Apple to court or part of current government investigation
It’s a different matter for observers to be critical than companies who filed lawsuits.
It makes perfect sense when epic are allowed back on the USA iOS App Store because then it would take away a particular point away from the conversation
I’m not prescient but I can’t see Apple allowing epic back in the us iOS App Store even if they lose. Thst point was affirmed in the original lawsuit epic filed.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.