They are mistreating the customer. If they are going to ban the apps arbitrarily, they will be subject to anti-monopoly regulations. They can't afford it.what law are they ignoring?
They are mistreating the customer. If they are going to ban the apps arbitrarily, they will be subject to anti-monopoly regulations. They can't afford it.what law are they ignoring?
Fortnite hasn’t been on iOS for a few years now. It doesn’t seem to have effected sales.Ultimately, it is the consumers that lose here.
Either let them back in the store so people can play Fortnite on their device.
Or, open installs from outside the App Store or alternative App Stores.
At the end of the day, it is no different than a mac or Windows or Android laptop or tablet. It is just a computer. Nothing really different, "because phone." The people that defend this would lose their mind if Microsoft announced tomorrow that they will now require all apps come from their store and Windows couldn't run anything else. It is that level of stupid.
I don't think Apple is being petty. Epic hired a major law firm and plotted out a way to break open the App Store for Epic's own benefit, engaged in numerous shady practices to set up its lawsuit, and now, when Apple refuses to deal with Epic, which is Apple's rights, attempts to have a different company submit Fortnite for approval. In all likelihood, Apple's counsel is looking at whether it can completely refuse to deal with Epic, or any Epic related company, for any purpose, whether it be about Fortnite or Unreal or anything else, moving forward.
well, that is not a "law".They are mistreating the customer. If they are going to ban the apps arbitrarily, they will be subject to anti-monopoly regulations. They can't afford it.
And because the court ruled Apple isn’t a monopoly, they can decide what products they offer in their store. They’re under no obligation to accept the app any more than Walmart is obligated to carry a Target house brand.You are confused. Epic's Sweden branch/subsidiary with legal account submitted the application.
No. You are close, but still miles away. There are a ton of other phones (cities in your terrible analogy, or rather STORES would be more realistic) that people can buy and do anything they want with. They buy an iPhone it is clear how it works, and nobody is forcing them to. If I am using your example it would be like a City Council agreeing that McDonalds should offer Whoppers in their storefronts and let Burger King get paid directly and McDonalds just having to suck it up and get nothing.No, it's different. Here is "you cannot have another store in this city" and even if the city council agrees, you do everything to go against competitors.
I'm not sure how Apple will be losing "potentially billions in future revenue" when Sweeney doesn't plan to allow Apple to make any money from Epic anyway. In fact, Sweeney plans to "cost" Apple money by free-riding on the App Store. Plus, Apple has been doing just fine financially since Epic was banned 5 years ago. So please clarify how Apple is losing anything by keeping them off the App Store.After costing apple potentially billions in future revenue; you can be sure that they're going to take their timedelayingbeing really thorough in checking this app before approving it.
Well, the court decided that Apple was breaking the law.Well gee, Epic intentionally broke the rules of the App Store. And now they want expedited review along with 30% cut and their game store on the platform they didn't build at all.
Tim Sweeney is a greedy ************
it would be different if Apple allowed you to use different software on the hardware.Hardware ≠ software. You pay for the hardware, and that hardware is yours. But you do not own iOS or any of its services. You’re a user of them.
It would be different should users be charged to use iOS, similar to how OS’s used to be paid.
Epic broke the contract. Because they broke the contract they were thrown out of the App Store. Can any point to any ruling that says Apple has to let them back in?Well, the court decided that Apple was breaking the law.
Additionally the way the law works is that you cannot sue if someone didn’t do the action you were during over.
So, Epic had to break the rules and have Apple do something before they could sue.
If they broke the rules and Apple let it slide, then
it would be different if Apple allowed you to use different software on the hardware.
I'm not sure how Apple will be losing "potentially billions in future revenue" when Sweeney doesn't plan to allow Apple to make any money from Epic anyway. In fact, Sweeney plans to "cost" Apple money by free-riding on the App Store. Plus, Apple has been doing just fine financially since Epic was banned 5 years ago. So please clarify how Apple is losing anything by keeping them off the App Store.
Nonsense, why should parasites like Epic get free access to the App Store?And this, right here, is the cost of an app. store monopoly, and why agencies like the DOJ bring suits. We all suffer because Apple chooses to play petty, illegal games.
No. It's time for Sweeny to realize that his theft has cost him millions, if not billions and give up this charade. He's not getting Fortnite back on the App Store nor should any Epic app be allowed back.It's time for the court to push even harder.
There's a fat chance the appeal will be accepted by a higher court.The judge didn't stay the ruling waiting on appeal; it applied immediately. There is also no guarantee an appeal will even be accepted by a higher court.
No. You are close, but still miles away. There are a ton of other phones (cities in your terrible analogy, or rather STORES would be more realistic) that people can buy and do anything they want with. They buy an iPhone it is clear how it works, and nobody is forcing them to. If I am using your example it would be like a City Council agreeing that McDonalds should offer Whoppers in their storefronts and let Burger King get paid directly and McDonalds just having to suck it up and get nothing.
if you want to look at it a different way, Epic's store rules would not allow Apple to offer FinalCut, iMovie, iWork, LogicPro, etc... in the EPIC store.... without Epic getting their % cut they make everyone else pay who is selling software in the Epic store.
This is purely Tim Sweeney being a little baby pooping his diaper. Just watch any video of him, he is a whiny man who is sad his store isn't big and basically Fortnite is their only money maker. They make deals with Developers where they GIVE away games for free just to get people to install their stuff... hoping people will install Fortnite so they can sell them V-Bucks. It's sad. He is sad.
"And because the court ruled Apple isn’t a monopoly, they can decide what products they offer in their store. They’re under no obligation to accept the app any more than Walmart is obligated to carry a Target house brand.
Epic got ghosted by Apple 😝Epic is like one of them annoying exes trying to get hold of you after a break up.
You don't get to avoid judgement just because you have filed an appeal. Quite literally 99% of all inmates in US prisons are awaiting the outcome of some sort of appeal. It doesn't mean they don't need to abide by the judgement of the court in the previous (standing) ruling. Appeals can take years. It stands until it's overturned.let me re-phrase: until Apple knows the outcome of the appeal they files - nothing will happen
Neither side really comes off particularly well in the whole thing.
At the end of the day Apple is preventing its own customers from playing Fortnite out of pettiness. Personally I don't care because it's not my thing, but if it was I'd be very annoyed with Apple.
As a shareholder why would we remotely want to lose such a revenue stream?Apple, just stop being a dick and acting like a 5yr old!