The fact is that if you don't have a reason to spend hours a day typing (which we both do, apparently), then you'll never actually get any faster. Like any skill, it takes practice. And like most skills, if you don't have a reason to learn it, it's probably not worth your time (part of the reason I am terrible at, say, basketball). So, if someone doesn't type regularly and can't touch-type and would benefit from some predictive text... well, why not?
But I love the nMB keyboard. I type much faster when there's less key travel. I've actually hit 87wpm on that keyboard, but that was a single datapoint, so I'd need to try it a few more times to get a reliable average. But considering the fastest I'd managed up to that point was 80 (maybe 81, I can't recall exactly), it's a non-trivial improvement.
And uh... sure, I'll give the S7 a try just as soon as it's not running Samsung's bloated take on Android.
I get keyboard preference, I really do (though mine seems to run exactly opposite to yours), but your comment made me wonder if you were serious or being a bit hyperbolic. Do you own an Apple laptop now? Because if you do, it sounds like you are willing to settle for a sub-optimal keyboard experience already in favor of (insert whatever your reasoning was for buying an Apple laptop), and there's a change that reasoning still applies despite the keyboard.
If you don't, then obviously I'm just reading too much into it. I was just wondering.
A week before Apple's just-announced October 27 Mac-centric event, a newly discovered trademark filing has been unearthed online, suggesting a potential name for the OLED panel on the new MacBook Pro. According to information rounded up by Brian Conroy at The Trademark Ninja (via The Next Web), a trademark filed by a company called "Presto Apps America LLC" for a device dubbed the "Magic Toolbar" could be Apple's name for the touch bar panel on its new MacBook Pro line.
They spend more time making up catchy names than anything else these days. Just release the goddam Mac Pro already!!Magic ToolBar - the official new name for the Apple GeniusBar
I agree, but then I haven't seen an implementation of it. Predictive text seems to make much more sense on the actual monitor inline with what you're typing. But I'll keep an open mind until I see what they might have in store.I would say the people who type that slowly and have no interest in touch typing are only hurting themselves with a keyboard at all. I've seen people get amazing speed out of a cellphone screen-keyboard with 2 thumbs and predictive text, and I'd suggest that's the better platform for predictive text. Moving your hands from a keyboard to a touchbar and eyes from a screen (or keyboard) to a touch bar is just too slow an operation while in the middle of typing.
That actually seems like a fairly common response to low-travel keyboards for people that learned to type on and fell in love with something that requires a good amount of force to register a stroke (like a quality mechanical keyboard). I learned to type almost exclusively on laptop keyboards, which have always been pretty soft or spongey in comparison, and so I don't think I strike quite as vigorously as a lot of folks. So that might be the difference right there.To me, the nMB keyboard feels like smashing my fingers on a sheet of glass with a little bit of rubber as padding. It is very painful for me to use it for any length of time.
I've tried Nova, and it was certainly better. But there were still a lot of little issues I had with the whole experience. If I were going to buy and Android phone I'd go with an HTC or that new Pixel over pretty much anything from Samsung.Actually, I do agree with you about the Samsung bloat. Android makes it very easy for you to swap out the launcher. I'd recommend the Nova launcher to give you something very close to a stock Android feel.
That actually seems like a fairly common response to low-travel keyboards for people that learned to type on and fell in love with something that requires a good amount of force to register a stroke (like a quality mechanical keyboard). I learned to type almost exclusively on laptop keyboards, which have always been pretty soft or spongey in comparison, and so I don't think I strike quite as vigorously as a lot of folks. So that might be the difference right there.
I just responded to DevNull0 who was saying the same thing about getting some painful feedback from that keyboard, and I'm starting to think the reason I don't have that response is that I learned to type on the spongey laptop keyboards of the early - mid 90's.I have a MacBook air. I use it for casual stuff, mostly because the screen is broken and about 10% of it is unusable, hence me holding out really hard for Apple's new laptops
The Apple keyboard in the MBA is one of the best keyboards in mobile I've used. I am slower on it due to the shallower throw compared to desktop keyboards. But for casual typing it's perfectly acceptible, even if I'm a bit slower on it.
But th e new MacBook keyboard's short throws are way too shallow for me. it feels like I am mashing the tips of my fingers down on a hard surface when I type. There's also almost no feedback except for that mashing. My hands started to hurt as well as I guess they weren't used to the shallow throw so the amount of force I was using was like jamming my fingers against a wall.
I get that there's going to be compromise in smaller devices. but the nMP keyboard goes too far for my preferences.
Just did one of those fancy "online speed tests" with my work's cheap dell bubble dome keyboard, which I generally don't like. stupid typos slowed me down![]()
Despite what The Verge says, it's really much more a hybrid - both a tablet and a laptop. And even more of a laptop than a tablet, as it apparently runs x86 processor and thus gives the full Windows experience. Whereas the iPad cannot run MacOS.
To me, the nMB keyboard feels like smashing my fingers on a sheet of glass with a little bit of rubber as padding. It is very painful for me to use it for any length of time.
I can touch type on the big iPad Pro... sorta. If I'm not watching the text on the screen, crap hits the fan real fast. So it's inferior. But I think I could get used to it IF they had some sort of texturing on the screen to help me feel where the edges of the keys were AND they put a taptic feedback engine underneath every key that would register each stroke.this I do see as a possibility. I learned to type on IBM Model M Keyboards, and have used Mechanical keyboards for desktop use for the better part of 30 years. Heck, my "Keyboarding" class in Grade 9 (23 years ago, I'm starting to feel old), would literally be an hour class of copying text out of our textbooks into IBM PS/2 word processor. and then repeat on a new page.
do this for a year straight, every other day, and eventually you get into a comfortable habbits for typing.
I'm trying to imagine what will happen on the next generation of kids who grew up starting with touchscreens. My nieces have never used a real keyboard in their life. But they can type fine on an iPad (ALthough i've never seen anyone touch type on a touchscreen, nor have any reasonable speed)
*for people that learned to type on them. I have used some old electric typewriters in the past, and I was utterly abysmal on them, mostly because I just wasn't used to them. For me Apple's newer keyboards are the absolute best for speed and accuracy.I feel that way too only because I switch between traditional keyboards and MacBook keyboard. If you use the MacBook keyboard long enough, you will adapt and your typing accuracy and speed will be comparable. To be honest, the old IBM PC keyboards of the 1980's were better. And the old electric typewriters of that era were the best for pure typing speed and accuracy.*
They would almost certainly be able to stop any other company applying for the trademark ‘Magic Toolbar’, on the basis it’s similar to their existing trademarks and likely to cause confusion.
Computer code is not hard to understand. It's all 1's and 0's. To simplify it a bit, we abstract the 1's and 0's to numbers, and then abstract the numbers to letters. The letters are abstracted in turn to words, then sentences, then paragraphs, and finally cat pictures. Computer code is just a matter of adding, subtracting, and transmogrifying cat pictures.Actually, most technology today works like magic. I bet very few people have the knowledge to explain how cell phones and software works.
Magic is the i-product conventionquit trying to make "magic" work
In an age of Amzon & Google devices that work with voice, what the heck is magical about a keyboard?
this I do see as a possibility. I learned to type on IBM Model M Keyboards, and have used Mechanical keyboards for desktop use for the better part of 30 years. Heck, my "Keyboarding" class in Grade 9 (23 years ago, I'm starting to feel old), would literally be an hour class of copying text out of our textbooks into IBM PS/2 word processor. and then repeat on a new page.
I love Apple's recent keyboards, because they're so solid (can't speak to the latest MacBook, having only used it for a moment in the store), but I liked the Apple //e keyboard too. One of my all-time favorites, though, was the old IBM 029 keypunch (we had a couple surplus ones in the computer lab in high school; I took advantage of this to do my Fortran on punch cards - even then it was a throwback) - on those, the key mechanism was very nice, but also the entire machine (the size of a desk, weighing hundreds of pounds) hummed and shuddered like there was an idling V8 engine inside it. When you pressed a key, it was like there was a little guy inside whacking the punch card with a sledgehammer - so satisfying. These days when people say, "no, this mechanical keyboard, see, there's a klack when you press the keys"... heh, they have no idea.*for people that learned to type on them. I have used some old electric typewriters in the past, and I was utterly abysmal on them, mostly because I just wasn't used to them. For me Apple's newer keyboards are the absolute best for speed and accuracy.