Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Quick! Plug the cracks in the dam! :p

It's the glasses that do it. Just wear the same glasses and BOOM...in like Flynn.
 
I agree. While it's true that a passcode can be used in situations where FaceID is insufficiently secure (or otherwise not usable, such as situations where the face must be covered), it would be great if people in those situations could choose Touch ID for the same reasons we loved it up until now -- it's better and faster than a passcode.

They can’t have both. I hate losing TouchID, but if getting rid of the Home button for a no-bezel screen, so be it Business decision.
 
Apple needs a tolerance setting so a user can set Face ID to require a high accuracy in similar circumstances and if it fails immediately ask for password or better yet, Touch ID.
 
Because this phone is a lot of money and Apple should be held to a high standard for quality
how does this “low quality” you perceive in Face ID affect you? Do you have a nosy lookalike sibling? Are you worried about an evil identical stranger unlocking your phone? Or are you just reacting negatively because that’s what you’re programmed to do?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Arty6 and Yoshimura
Any claim that Face ID has security issues before the year's end is fundamentally flawed. Face ID is powered by machine learning. It scans your face and updates its model accordingly every time you attempt to authenticate using it. It learns from times when it doesn't unlock, and you then type the correct password. It gives heavier weighting to the best scans and, of course, gets to know you better with time. The first two scans in setup will provide some basis for your initial interactions but will quickly become insignificant in the model. If someone's sibling manages to get in after a month or so of use by the main user, then we can be concerned.
 
Omg, I give up. This discussion here is futile with some of you guys. You all clearly seem to hold the pentagons secrets on your phone and all have a family feud, where your siblings are just dying to get into your phone, which wouldn't be that hard, as most people use a date as a passcode and siblings most likely would be able to figure it out.
But sure let's all go off collectively, about something that Apple always has communicated very clearly.
And countless numbers of times? How? The phone hasn't even been out for 48 hours.
All I can say is, that it work perfectly from the very beginning for me. I tried it with people that looked like me and there was no "fail". And after a week and all the neural engines out there being trained, videos like this one will be hard to find.
But sure, let's go off, shall we?
I said "was NOT fooled a countless number of time"
 
OK, who cares, nothing is 100%. Why is it that society must always try to make something fail or find fault? Why can't we try to find the positive in things in life and not usually always trying to find the negative.

I agree with you when it comes to many things but not security and access to personal information.
 
Apple claims that touch ID is only 1:50,000 which means that face ID is 20x more secure. However, is the 1 in 50,000 likely to be someone closely related to you or statistically randomized among the entire world population?
If the latter then I'd rather have the 1 in 50,000.
Since a large number of users are going to be teens and millennials, they will have siblings living at home with them who can get access to their phone. Not the userbase you want to inconvenience.

You make an spot-on excellent point.
It's more than just the numbers.

It would be like saying:

There are 7,580,000,000 Over seven and a half billion people on the earth NOW.
The iPhone only unlocks to people who wear a T-Shirt with a specific logo on it. (my workplace)
At my workplace, we only have 30 people working.

So out of the entire population 7.58 billion, only 30 can unlock my phone.
So only 1 in over 252 million people can unlock my phone

That's over 250 times more secure than the current Face ID system

Super secure huh ?

Well no.......

It means, due to my location and real life usage, everyone who I work with, every single day has access to my phone.

As you can see. it's more than just the numbers that counts for how secure something is.
 
Curious, what does putting on glasses have to do with fooling it? Thought glasses were essentially ignored in the face map.

Bizarre. Clearly....they're not. It unlocked when he had the glasses on. So an integral part of the unlocking process by the looks of it.

:D
 
:apple: apologist here :)
Phil Schiller did say in the keynote that the chances of another person unlocking your iPhone with Face ID are higher if "that person shares a close genetic relationship with you". Full brothers have 50% of their genes in common.

Gross generalization. Full brothers share approximately 50% of the genes that make us unique with each other, which is roughly 5% of your total genes. You share about 98% of your total genes with every other human.
 
The technology is amazing. No one is using it yet. The fact that it’s not perfect is understable. As for a higher degree of scrutiny due to the increased price - This is a Phone for affluent people for whom $1,500 is nothing. The genius of Apple is that they are not trying to take over the entire world. They take over the affluent part of the world. I spent two hours in line yesterday with hundreds of folks who didn’t look rich. I didn’t get the phone, but the Apple store reserved one me for me for my trouble. I went there last night and got it in 20 minutes with a reservation.

Is this phone worth $1,500? Of course not. But, I’m a shareholder and I love it that Apple is able to sell the phone for this price and people keep coming and begging Apple to sell them this phone. I witnessed it yesterday. At night, people kept coming in droves hoping to get a phone.

Apple made me $25,000 just in one day yesterday. I felt I could spend $1,500 to own a piece if tech that has made me a fortune in the past decade.

No one is entitled to this phone and no one must have this phone. This is your choice. If you can afford it, buy it. If you can’t afford it but “must have” it, buy it. Otherwise, don’t buy it or if you already bought it, return it. This phone is a luxury item, and you are volunteering your own money to make me and other shareholders richer. It’s your choice, but make no mistake: Apple owes you nothing. Apple is not begging you to buy their phones. You are begging Apple to sell you their phone even when you know you can’t afford it and should not spend your money on it. And that’s the genius of Apple.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MacBebe and jstdr1v
This x1000. Apple clearly states it learns and improves as you use it. You can’t just enroll a face then give it to your twin (this is what CNN Money did in their video - they literally handed it straight to the twin after enrollment).

Won’t stop countless idiots from claiming it’s not secure, though.

Where is the engineering data that shows the phone would stop authenticating the non-twin brother after a certain period of "machine learning"

As for "countless idiots" claiming it's not secure, this video is an objective demonstration that it's not, at least for relatives who look similar.
 
The fact that they never show the set-up process makes this highly questionable.


... or the fact that both times they trade off phones, the phone goes below the lowest portion of the camera angle. Did you notice that the phone went below the level of the video right before he put his glasses on?

1. They could be trying to get their 5 minutes of fame to fool everyone... who cares
2. They could have figured out a way for similar people to fool the system (add accessories)
3. They could have a questionable setup process
4. It could be due to first time accuracy with the lack of multiple points for machine learning (i.e. gets better with time)
5. Phone could have been angled enough to capture the original brother (he is out of frame)

6. Does it really matter? Are you legitimately worried that you're going to lose your locked phone, and just by absolute chance, the person that found it coincidentally looks like you?
 
  • Like
Reactions: SashJ
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.