Poor dog.my dog looks like me does it mean he gets to unlock the phone ?
Poor dog.my dog looks like me does it mean he gets to unlock the phone ?
I agree. While it's true that a passcode can be used in situations where FaceID is insufficiently secure (or otherwise not usable, such as situations where the face must be covered), it would be great if people in those situations could choose Touch ID for the same reasons we loved it up until now -- it's better and faster than a passcode.
Why, 99% will enable both so the brother still could have gotten in via Face ID.That's one reason i believe a dual ID system would be better. Enable touch id or face id.
how does this “low quality” you perceive in Face ID affect you? Do you have a nosy lookalike sibling? Are you worried about an evil identical stranger unlocking your phone? Or are you just reacting negatively because that’s what you’re programmed to do?Because this phone is a lot of money and Apple should be held to a high standard for quality
I said "was NOT fooled a countless number of time"Omg, I give up. This discussion here is futile with some of you guys. You all clearly seem to hold the pentagons secrets on your phone and all have a family feud, where your siblings are just dying to get into your phone, which wouldn't be that hard, as most people use a date as a passcode and siblings most likely would be able to figure it out.
But sure let's all go off collectively, about something that Apple always has communicated very clearly.
And countless numbers of times? How? The phone hasn't even been out for 48 hours.
All I can say is, that it work perfectly from the very beginning for me. I tried it with people that looked like me and there was no "fail". And after a week and all the neural engines out there being trained, videos like this one will be hard to find.
But sure, let's go off, shall we?
OK, who cares, nothing is 100%. Why is it that society must always try to make something fail or find fault? Why can't we try to find the positive in things in life and not usually always trying to find the negative.
Apple claims that touch ID is only 1:50,000 which means that face ID is 20x more secure. However, is the 1 in 50,000 likely to be someone closely related to you or statistically randomized among the entire world population?
If the latter then I'd rather have the 1 in 50,000.
Since a large number of users are going to be teens and millennials, they will have siblings living at home with them who can get access to their phone. Not the userbase you want to inconvenience.
Still a failure in my eyes if Apple couldn’t perfect it, they shouldn’t have released it until it was betterYup, lord knows how many thousands of beta testers will be robbed by thieves who happen to look just like their twin brother.
Oh wait.
Curious, what does putting on glasses have to do with fooling it? Thought glasses were essentially ignored in the face map.
you would make an EXCELLENT security specialistOK, who cares, nothing is 100%. Why is it that society must always try to make something fail or find fault? Why can't we try to find the positive in things in life and not usually always trying to find the negative.
I call BS on this. I simply don't believe their story.
It's not a bug. These guys look very much alike, and the neural engine was just not trained enough
Then perhaps the setup process should require multiple scans to initialize.
apologist here
Phil Schiller did say in the keynote that the chances of another person unlocking your iPhone with Face ID are higher if "that person shares a close genetic relationship with you". Full brothers have 50% of their genes in common.
you have more problem than losing the phone because the culprit is probably your brother or relatives
This x1000. Apple clearly states it learns and improves as you use it. You can’t just enroll a face then give it to your twin (this is what CNN Money did in their video - they literally handed it straight to the twin after enrollment).
Won’t stop countless idiots from claiming it’s not secure, though.
The fact that they never show the set-up process makes this highly questionable.