Because this phone is a lot of money and Apple should be held to a high standard for quality
You can't fool it with a picture, so it already higher standard.
Because this phone is a lot of money and Apple should be held to a high standard for quality
Curious, what does putting on glasses have to do with fooling it? Thought glasses were essentially ignored in the face map.
Machine learning. The more you use it, the more secure it gets. Setting it up and handing it to your brother on the same day is bound to throw an error
OK, who cares, nothing is 100%. Why is it that society must always try to make something fail or find fault? Why can't we try to find the positive in things in life and not usually always trying to find the negative.
Source? I don't remember them saying it collects more data after initial set up...This x1000. Apple clearly states it learns and improves as you use it. You can’t just enroll a face then give it to your twin (this is what CNN Money did in their video - they literally handed it straight to the twin after enrollment).
Won’t stop countless idiots from claiming it’s not secure, though.
Nope I waited because the specs didn’t blow me away me the 8 plus has the same specs but cheaper. I’ll get the larger X version next year and when the specs get bumped upYou waited till next year because you either can’t afford it or need to justify the fact that you couldn’t get it. This Face ID works fast and perfectly. You are missing out. Trust me it’s not in beta.
Where is the engineering data that shows the phone would stop authenticating the non-twin brother after a certain period of "machine learning"
As for "countless idiots" claiming it's not secure, this video is an objective demonstration that it's not, at least for relatives who look similar.
My wife’s younger brother was always able to use his thumb to unlock her phone. Touch ID wasn’t perfect.
Seems slow and a pain to use, which is a problem. Maybe if you got rid of the extra swipe up after it unlocks it would seem less clunky? I don't know, but that second of hesitation it takes to unlock shouldn't be there.
This is another example of why Apple isn't the same company and puts out lesser products than they used to. The ugly cutout and the clunky face-id system, the camera hump simply wouldn't have happened before. Now they make compromises, and it's hard to be dedicated or care about products that clearly are "good enough." Overall they still make the best smartphones I suppose, but where they used to be in a whole different league than their competition, now they're very much just another phone maker. What's especially frustrating is that this has been allowed to happen as they pile up 200+ billion in cash--they have the resources to be so much better.
As far as this video...well, it's not good, but maybe they handed off the phone during setup?
By who? Do YOU have a twin?I agree with you when it comes to many things but not security and access to personal information.
Seems slow and a pain to use, which is a problem. Maybe if you got rid of the extra swipe up after it unlocks it would seem less clunky? I don't know, but that second of hesitation it takes to unlock shouldn't be there.
This is another example of why Apple isn't the same company and puts out lesser products than they used to. The ugly cutout and the clunky face-id system, the camera hump simply wouldn't have happened before. Now they make compromises, and it's hard to be dedicated or care about products that clearly are "good enough." Overall they still make the best smartphones I suppose, but where they used to be in a whole different league than their competition, now they're very much just another phone maker. What's especially frustrating is that this has been allowed to happen as they pile up 200+ billion in cash--they have the resources to be so much better.
As far as this video...well, it's not good, but maybe they handed off the phone during setup?
Actually this video is nothing and shouldn't even be considered since we don't know how they setup the phone, and multiple times the phone leaves the camera view.
Source? I don't remember them saying it collects more data after initial set up...
Not to mention that Cook mentioned that siblings and other family members had a chance of this sort of thing.Machine learning. The more you use it, the more secure it gets. Setting it up and handing it to your brother on the same day is bound to throw an error
Indeed.
I'm pretty sure I recall, just a few weeks ago on these forums, it being posted that Face ID "DOES NOT" record additional data from your face after the initial set up.
I even recall myself writing a posting to that thread.
People are now, seeming to make up a new story that it's constantly reading more data every time and adding to dsome internal detail database.
As I said, I thought it was said weeks ago this did not happen.
And a passcode.Need both FaceID and TouchID simultaneously.
Don’t forget that a large percentage of people never set up a security code or activate TouchID. Apple requires that a security code is activated only if you want to use iCloud. Most iPhone users have no clue about iCloud or anything else besides browsing Facebook on their phone.Where is the engineering data that shows the phone would stop authenticating the non-twin brother after a certain period of "machine learning"
As for "countless idiots" claiming it's not secure, this video is an objective demonstration that it's not, at least for relatives who look similar.
Don’t forget that a large percentage of people never set up a security code or activate TouchID. Apple requires that a security code is activated only if you want to use iCloud. Most iPhone users have no clue about iCloud or anything else besides browsing Facebook on their phone.
If you like TouchID better, get an iPhone 8.
Another Face ID fail video...this time with half-brothers