No, but the articles at least discuss the mechanism by which damage can be done, and as I've said, they're a starting point.
Of course, security cameras aren't held just a foot or two away from one's face as many as 80 times a day, so that's not really comparable either.
You have been very reasonable and clear, so I don't understand how so many people seem to have failed to understand the kind of discussion you are trying to have.
I would imagine you'd hoped to get some input from fellow members who work in the health field or people who might have come across some studies in the course of their careers or hobbies that most of us might have missed. It seems very logical and reasonable to me to question new technology that contacts organs as delicate as the eye. After all, it isn't as if consumer products never kill or injure anyone, nor as if there are never any safety recalls. Consumer product designs fail quite often and sometimes the results are catastrophic as any examination of product recalls will show.
Something about the IR scanner in my Samsung caused progressively worsening pain to my eyes to the point I can no longer use it. It could have had something to do with how the light went through my glasses. I don't know. I may never know. How long exactly have we been aiming IR beams into people's faces and eyes? Yes we know we have IR from the sun and candles and our bodies. But this particular application hasn't been used on great masses of consumers before. There may be unfavorable variables yet to be discovered the hard way.
There are some people reporting odd pain when using Apple watches. We don't know why they have that pain. It may be years before there is sufficent scientific investigation and resulting data to explain that issue. To think we know everything about the technology that passes approval is naive.
Have you ever heard about the horrific known effects of a common cytotoxic agent commonly added as a preservative to even "natural" household cleaners, shampoos, body washes? I'm surprised it's in use given what is known about it. But that is the US government for you. Methylisothiazolinone for years was of "unknown" threat but now we know too late that it's caused severe sensitivity and allergies in countless people. It's in the environment now and no avoiding it. A regulatory body in Europe has issued advisories on it and voluntary bans. I don't see anything limiting or warning about it in the US.
According to a news item I saw in my CNN news earlier in the year, we have rising rates of colorectal cancers appearing in unprecedented numbers among people as young as 18. It's enough that there's talk of lowering the recommended age for colorectal cancer screening. And we don't know why this is happening. What did we introduce into our lives that's presenting this threat to millennials?
Sorry for the tangents, but I hope they helped to illustrate that it's not stupid or alarmist to ask questions about product safety.
