I don't understand why they are being sued when it's been said that it will be available late summer.
It's not late summer yet.
It's not late summer yet.
I don't understand why they are being sued when it's been said that it will be available late summer.
It's not late summer yet.
I would like my iPhone to do my laundry. What? There isnt an app for that?
Lawsuit.
i'll join THAT one!
This is almost as pathetic as lawsuits against McDonalds for serving hot coffee.
Judge tries to MMS a picture of his cat doing some crazy shenaniganz to his friend on his iPhone.
Friend does not recieve picture of cat.
Judge revises ruling.
Why would a woman need an app for laundry...
*Zip*
You are going to sue a company over lack of MMS? Someone needs to look up the word damages and tell this moron why he has NO case.
The basis of this case is False Advertising. During the 3GS Launch, Apple and AT&T heavily advertised and touted MMS on the iPhone 3GS and 3.0 Software Updates. Customers who had never had an iPhone before and who were unfamiliar with it, saw the MMS in advertisements and on the Apple website and went and bought a 3GS only to find out that it did not have MMS. That is False Advertising and that is what the lawsuit alleges.
http://www.betanews.com/article/ATT...ss-action-over-iPhone-MMS-promises/1250191285
Do you know of any examples of any ads that have run in the US that feature MMS without the "later this summer" disclaimer?
Every add I've ever seen (Print or TV) for the 3GS had the disclaimer about MMS.Do you know of any examples of any ads that have run in the US that feature MMS without the "later this summer" disclaimer?
Verdict and settlement
Applying the principles of comparative negligence, the jury found that McDonald's was 80% responsible for the incident and Liebeck was 20% at fault. Though there was a warning on the coffee cup, the jury decided that the warning was neither large enough nor sufficient. They awarded Liebeck US$200,000 in compensatory damages, which was then reduced by 20% to $160,000. In addition, they awarded her $2.7 million in punitive damages. The jurors apparently arrived at this figure from Morgan's suggestion to penalize McDonald's for one or two days' worth of coffee revenues, which were about $1.35 million per day.[5] The judge reduced punitive damages to $480,000, three times the compensatory amount, for a total of $640,000. The decision was appealed by both McDonald's and Liebeck in December 1994, but the parties settled out of court for an undisclosed amount less than $600,000.[16] Liebeck died on August 4, 2004, at the age of 91.
I guess AT&T were the only US carriers who were prepared to have zero branding - either physically on the device, or via software and their choice of branded apps.How AT&T managed to get the iPhone is beyond me.
I am aware that no one will probably read this (or care), but heregoes:
This story about the McDonalds hot coffee has been blown out of proportion by the media and popular culture. The woman that was the plaintiff in that suit suffered third degree burns on her genitals. McDonalds had, at the time the accident occurred, received several complaints and knew that there was a problem. The woman was actually severely injured. McDonalds continued the overheating of the coffee to save a few bucks despite knowing of the potential and history of causing injury.
But now, years later, it's usually used as a comparison for a frivolous lawsuit. Which is really too bad.
Every add I've ever seen (Print or TV) for the 3GS had the disclaimer about MMS.
As for the McDonalds lawsuit, the old lady didn't get millions. After McD's appealed, they decided to settle out of court for much less.
And there was a warning on the cup... just too small I guess.
Although I would like to know how insufficient the word "HOT" is.
Like a cup of coffee needs a warning in the first place.![]()
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liebeck_v._McDonald's_Restaurants#Verdict_and_settlement
Already done.
If you can't afford it, don't buy it. How is this difficult. WHY is this question even coming up.
Next you'll be suing Bugatti for making the Veyron too expensive.
Who the ******* cares about MSS?????!!!!!! Sue them bastards for lack of the Google Voice app!!!!!!!![]()
oh for ****s sake. its not about not being able to afford it. it's about being billed for 1000's of minutes that I don't use or want. I don't care about the data prices, they are fine. Its the retarded voice plans
It's a good thing that "late" isn't something that can be measured. My definition of late summer might be the start of August but if AT&T's is September 20th, then I guess they haven't failed to come through on anything yet?
Speaking of this, that lady got MILLIONS of dollars because of this. I took a BLAW class last month and we talked about this. McDonalds lost millions because they forgot to warn customers on the cup that the coffee was hot.
Ridiculous.
Wikipedia is not a reliable source at all for the fact anyone can edit it. Again if you get 3rd degree burns from coffee and need surgery, what does that tell you.. the coffee was boiling hot. Who drinks boiling hot coffee?? If you need surgery from a spill like that, there are issues with that coffee.
-- ask a Canadian what kind of service they get for $70 a month. I've had Sprint, AT&T, Verizon and T-mobile and of those, AT&T has so far offered the best service for the price in my local area -- all the more impressive considering how far behind their network was, and the millions of new bandwidth hungry users they had to support along with the iPhone.