Being used to Aperture, the first thing that pops to mind: - Does Photos support raw files?
anyone gave it a try?
Now if only they would make the iOS Photos app worth a damn. No ability to search by the keywords set in iPhoto, my photo albums are in no semblance of order whatsoever, not chronological or grouped by location. Also, no way to search for a certain person based on Faces. Again these are all completely out of order. It's a joke; I wish I had never deleted the photos from my camera roll. At least those are in chronological order.
QUESTION:
I did not see this in the video. Concerning file management, will there be a sidebar on the left/right side like there currently is so I can create folders, drag, drop, and rearrange photos and projects, etc. or will everything be automated and forced like the current iOS photos?
*EDIT* Thank you for sending me this photo. Yes it does have a sidebar and a listing of all projects and folders for management.
I don't see anyone has answered this. I'm still trying to figure this out but nothing seems to be addressing. Maybe it's a stupid question. But I can make playlists on my iPhone and they will sync over, right? Why not albums?
Will I be able to trasfer all my Events to the new Photos app and will they synch alphabetically?
Do the photos need to be in Folders as all mine are in Events currently in iPhoto.
Has anyone seen this? https://twitter.com/schwa/status/563763186411659264
I'm curious why OneDrive? I tried it out briefly, but thought Dropbox with Carousel was substantially better, so I've been using that now.
I used to be pretty happy with PhotoStream/Aperture, but they essentially let both die. Shared PhotoStreams are limited in resolution, so it doesn't work for backing up photos from all devices.
Now I have everything sync to Dropbox using Carousel, and then have Hazel (alternatively, Folder Actions) copy new files into my Lightroom's Auto-Import folder. Also, once you get past the interface Lightroom is leaps and bounds better than Aperture ever was, so at least I got some benefit from Apple ditching it. And it's Flickr uploading tool works perfectly and syncs all metadata from Flickr (comments, ratings, tags, etc.) back into the local files. Perfect.
Do not use iCloud Photo Sharing or the default Family Sharing album if you want to preserve the original images. Photos in the shared stream are resized to a maximum long-edge pixel size (which escapes me for the moment, but it's smaller than the images from an iPhone 6) Edit: It's 2304px.
Yes, sorta. There are no raw adjustments as in Aperture. Also if you import both JPEG and RAW versions there doesn't seem to be a way to switch between them (whatever you had as your primary version when you imported into Aperture or changed later in Aperture seems to be what you are stuck with in Photos.
I haven't tried importing anything new into Photos to see what happens (with RAW+JPEG) then.
Yes implicitly and explicitly. Apple will be dropping any updates for the product and wanting people to transition over to photos.
----------
I didn't, I'm not surprised but I am disappointed. Apple is clearly focusing on the consumer, and the enthusiast needs look elsewhere for tools that better fit their needs.
----------
No actually my expectation is exactly what apple did. I was upfront in the photography forum saying that the Photo's app will be a shell of Aperture. My words held true, but that doesn't mean I can't be disappointed in the direction apple is taking.
So.... if I enable this fancy new iCloud photos feature on my Mac, is iCloud going to try and upload the existing 20GB (whatever) of my MAC photo library? Thus requiring me to buy more cloud space? If so, not cool. Hopefully a user can set it to NOT upload the entire Mac photo library... or maybe I'm asking too much... or maybe I'm not getting it. Which could easily be what is happening at this point.
I have at least 80GB worth of photos every year on average for the past few years. This is a colossal fail if I have to upload all my RAW photos to the cloud. Unbelievable ... amateurs and pros are most likely getting lower into the priority for Apple ecosystem. Yikes!
Lightroom & CaptureOne kick Apertures butt, so Apple abandons the Pro market completely, ignores even the Prosumer market, and creates an app for teenagers posting selfies on Facebook.
And then charges a subscription fee to use it...
okidoki then.
I hate the fact that iPhoto would try to import videos. It was always in the way.
'Photos' app for photos only.
If you want videos make a video app, maybe call it 'Videos'
What is it with the overreacting in this forum. I suggest you just don't check the 'put photos in the cloud' box. pretty easy.
For that matter create more than one library, and only have one be icloud synced if you so wish.
----------
a subscription??
Initial reviews of Photos for OS X are advising that important iPhoto features, such as flags, star ratings, events, etc are missing.
i'm familiar with Faces, but how does it integrate with Facebook? call me curious. and afraid for humanity...
So if Apple wants us to "fill your library, not your device," does that mean they expect us to delete our local full-resolution copy after its uploaded to iCloud? Or does that happen automatically? I really wish the price of 1TB SSD's were lower, then keeping our pics on our own machine would be an easier decision to make.
sorry to have disappoint you ... a little touchy on a forum don't you think.
Anyway, can you confirm that there is in fact an option to do selective upload to cloud? The article that I was commenting on wasn't clear on it.