Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
I have an "Early 2015" 13". There's really nothing in the new range that would make me consider upgrading. Not a knock on the new MBPs at all, I actually think they're great (but expensive).
 
  • Like
Reactions: navaira
17" screen and 32 GB RAM. Everything else I can live with.

Although 17" alone would probably do it for me.
 
I've been waiting two years for this upgrade. I was 100% ready to buy a new MacBook Pro. All they needed to do was add (or I should say leave):

1. At least two USB ports. They can add the USB-C port, but they should not have removed all the other ports. That's stupid. 99% of all third party items still use the USB port...EVEN THEIR NEW IPHONE 7!

That's it. Not difficult is it? I have two hard drives, at least 4-5 flash drives, iPad, iPod Shuffle and iPhone 7. All of which I cannot connect to the new MacBook Pro. No, I do not want to carry around a bunch of stupid "dongles" and adapters when the computer costs $1500+. That's stupid. Apple is crazy and their earnings report will reflect this.

It would not have been difficult to leave two USB ports on the right side of the laptop. Not difficult at all.
 
Would have bought 15" if any ONE of these was true

1) Price was a $200 less

2) entry storage was 512GB

3) SD slot, at least one USB 3.0 port remained and Apple adopted MagSafe to USB-C (Kensington already has such a cable, so it exists, Apple just didn't want to go to the expense).

4) SD slot, at least one USB 3.0 port remained and Apple kept the existing MBP keyboard

Also would be more inclinded to "think about it" as-is if Apple included a snap-on adapter that added USB 3.0 and SD slots (again already exists, sells for about $40 on Amazon) AND an HDMI adapter.

BUT I will likely buy next round no matter what. Guessing that won't be until 3rd or 4thQ next year and my 2012 will be 5 years old and I won't be able to hold off anymore.
 
Believe me, I did want to upgrade this year. I was looking forward to Apple making me excited about the MacBook Pro again. The new MacBook Pro did just enough to be considered a new body style as happens about every four years, but not enough for me to justify a purchase just yet.

2012's MacBook Pro was a beautiful must-upgrade piece of machinery. They introduced a Retina Display and improved upon the unibody design while providing cutting-edge hardware. This was a no-brainer upgrade for me, and finding it on-sale for a few hundred off a few weeks after it came out made it a worthwhile upgrade even if I barely netted $700 for my 2008 MacBook Pro. Now though, it still stands up with the best of the Mac lineup which is a positive in that I really don't need to upgrade. It's over 33% faster than a Core i7 base 13" MacBook Pro and twice as fast as a MacBook, while sporting a Retina Display with the same resolution as the new generation that the MacBook Air doesn't even (and probably won't ever) have.

I wasn't looking for any unrealistic new features to make the leap to a new generation. An OLED display would have made me happy to upgrade. IGZO could've been satisfactory. I do think the improved display they did add is noticeably better and makes me want to upgrade more than anything else. However, it's not that much better that I'm going to go through the hassle of selling my MacBook Pro and spending $2,399 for it.

The price isn't the issue though: it's that the value isn't high enough. Maybe if the base 15" came with 512GB of flash storage I could've justified it a bit more, but the base still comes with 256GB like it did four years ago.

Even performance improvements are looking to be more moderate than expected; unfortunately, it certainly won't benchmark anywhere near twice as fast as my four-year-old MacBook Pro. The design looks nicer as expected though, and Space Grey works really well. While I'm sure I'd get enjoyment and use out of the Touch Bar, as a package deal it's just not enough for me to upgrade at a premium.

For me to spend $2,399 I would have wanted an OLED Retina Display that's preferably 4K, the latest Intel Kaby Lake processors, and 512GB of flash storage. If we're not getting an OLED display for another four years, I'll probably sit these next few years out or move over to an iMac assuming it gets a full refresh relatively soon.

I am still considering the new MacBook Pro, but it would be the 13" with an external display... which just doesn't make sense. In all honesty the iPhone and iPad are already portable computers, Apple should be focusing on the iMac and Mac Pro as much as the MacBook Pro.
I agree with a lot of what you said, as I'm still using a 2011 15" MBP with an SSD and 8GB RAM, but for the sake of playing devil's advocate:

- 4k would kill battery life and increase heat.
- Newest CPU doesn't offer much more than the one they used.
- External memory is cheaper than ever before, as is cloud (amazon, Apple, etc.) and online storage.
- New body style shouldn't dictate a purchase - internals should.

But, like I said, I agree with you in that I can wait. I just hope Apple doesn't add 4k resolution or up the entry level memory (price increase) or go with the latest CPU released (price increase with not much performance increase), or redesign the body much (and pass off the R&D to consumers, through price).
 
I was upgrading from a maxed out MBA, and ready to pull the trigger.
Ended up buying a maxed out 2015 15" MBP last week.

the pricing was way better #1
comparable in speed/specs for my uses.
No 32 ram option, so again- no difference
Would not use the touch bar that much (work in VM's) along with OS X programs simultaneously
Ports- traveling with this allows me to use what I already own.
.5 lbs, no big deal
display, no biggie I don't use it outside- still a retina.
Ease of use with the monitors I have 24" ACD, and a 27" 4k in my other office when traveling
Magsafe- get to keep my chargers :)
I like the keyboard on mine better.

Cons.
I like the other trackpad size better.
 
After waiting for 3 years (yes, you can find me posting on the first page of Waiting for Skylake thread, but I digressed), I wanted to get myself a MBP 15". As soon as I saw the price during the Apple event, I thought for myself "no way I'm spending €2800 for this base model". Couple with the fact that it comes with Intel HD 530 which is probably half as fast as a HD 550/540 on the 13"... I can live with the lack of legacy ports (I don't even use HDMI/SD Card slot), MagSafe, and a glowing Apple logo... but not this. I mean, it's not entirely Apple's fault, Intel didn't release the models with Iris Pro 580 soon enough. But no way I'm going to spend that much money to contemplate UI lagfest.

In the end, I saved myself €1000 and got the base 13" non TB (which I think is the only worthy model to buy on the basis of price/performance ratio), and build a desktop. With €1000 I can get GTX 1070 and i5-6700K, so more power for me at home.

The decision to go with Intel HD 530 is a very logical one.

The point of the integrated graphics is to be more energy efficient when there is no need for the discrete AMD GPU.

Going Iris graphics would simply make the integrated GPU more energy consuming while the only advantage would be faster graphics for more demanding task, something that will never be used since the AMD discrete GPU will kick in at this moment.

So basically going Iris would have only achieved more energy consumption.
 
Going to sound like a parrot here:

- 32GB
- DDR4
- Iris Pro 580 capable CPUs

or simply:

Put the current internals into the older body. lol.
 
My rational brain is saying not to upgrade, but my emotional brain is saying shiny new Apple product, must unbox and use.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TigerWoodsIV
- More reasonable price
- 16 GB on the 13" with Touch bar
- Screen resolution bump, a 13" can have the same resolution as my current 15"
- USB-A port + SD card slot, or at the very least a USB-C to USB-A adapter in the box
- MagSafe USB-C port
- Upgradable SSD

So, definitely not a small list of things I wish Apple had done differently. Even for owners of the mid 2012 Retina, the 2016 is not a compelling buy.
You can definitely get 16Gb on the 13" with Touch bar.
 
You can definitely get 16Gb on the 13" with Touch bar.
The 13" with Touch Bar costs $1800. At that already high price point, there is only 8 GB RAM. Putting 16 GB on all 13" with Touch Bar models is something Apple could have done differently to help convince me to go for an upgrade.
 
What in the 2016 13" would have made me buy it immediately (and I already have a 2015 13"):
- Keep the same form factor, no need for thinner and lighter
- Keep the same battery size for a 15-16 hours battery life
- Keep the same ports, swap the TB2 ports with USB-C ports
- Option for touch ID only, no touch bar.

I couldn't care less for the touch bar. Working with my IDE and Linux terminal, I need Esc and F keys all the time, I don't want to hold down Fn to access them thank you very much.
 
I was getting caught up in the hype prior to the media event, no question. I've been a long time Mac user and while I've been a bit disappointed with Apple and the Macs of late, I did buy an iMac last year and its been fantastic.
With that said, I think the current MBPs misses the mark for me for the following reasons
No SD card slot, no HDMI, no MagSafe connector, I do't like the force touch touch pad and I hate the keyboard.

While the first two issues are easily solved with dongles/devices, I carry enough crap, and the odds of losing or forgetting them is high.

I've said this multiple times, but it bears repeating, I hate that apple removed the magsafe connector, It has saved my computer from disaster a number of times. I guess there's third party products filling that need, which is a plus, but I do hate the fact that its missing. Its not just that I'm clumsey, but when you're in a hotel room with the laptop on a table and someone walks by they may very well trip over it. That's what happened last month with my Surface Book (it has an easy detach connector), and the connector flew off and my laptop was safe. Going to shows and conferences where I'm sitting by a plug and charging up my laptop, same risk applies, someone not noticing what they're doing trips over the cord...

As for the latter two, I suppose I could get used to the touch pad, or use a mouse, the real show stopper is the keyboard, I simply hate the butterfly keyboard and feel that there was no reason to put it in a high end laptop, other then Apple wanting to make a thinner laptop which was not necessary
 
What bothers me the most is the dongle crap, I could possibly live with the keyboard (maybe, big maybe, probably not) but I will not carry any dongles or additional cables with me.

So my new dream macbook would have probably have the same connections as the last one (esp. magsafe) and also the old keyboard. The size and the weight could have been the same so they probably could have fit a bigger battery inside.

I am also a big enemy of the touch bar I don't need it and I don't want it. In my opinion this is just an unnecessary energy consumer.
 
I was getting caught up in the hype prior to the media event, no question. I've been a long time Mac user and while I've been a bit disappointed with Apple and the Macs of late, I did buy an iMac last year and its been fantastic.
With that said, I think the current MBPs misses the mark for me for the following reasons
No SD card slot, no HDMI, no MagSafe connector, I do't like the force touch touch pad and I hate the keyboard.

While the first two issues are easily solved with dongles/devices, I carry enough crap, and the odds of losing or forgetting them is high.

I've said this multiple times, but it bears repeating, I hate that apple removed the magsafe connector, It has saved my computer from disaster a number of times. I guess there's third party products filling that need, which is a plus, but I do hate the fact that its missing. Its not just that I'm clumsey, but when you're in a hotel room with the laptop on a table and someone walks by they may very well trip over it. That's what happened last month with my Surface Book (it has an easy detach connector), and the connector flew off and my laptop was safe. Going to shows and conferences where I'm sitting by a plug and charging up my laptop, same risk applies, someone not noticing what they're doing trips over the cord...

As for the latter two, I suppose I could get used to the touch pad, or use a mouse, the real show stopper is the keyboard, I simply hate the butterfly keyboard and feel that there was no reason to put it in a high end laptop, other then Apple wanting to make a thinner laptop which was not necessary

Well stated maflynn..
All of these exact reasons is why I just bought the 2015 15" love it btw. Should last me 4-5 years and 1k or better in savings.
I could not justify the price difference to top it all off. Local Apple store owed me one and I called in the card on the last one in stock.
 
Here's my list...
  • Retaining two USB-A ports
  • Retaining SD card slot
  • Including a MagSafe-like to USB-C power cable (breakaway cable)
  • Using at least an Nvidia GTX 1060M to power the 15"
  • Keyboard with proper key travel and feel
  • Max out battery capacity
  • 32GB RAM option I don't care if its not super low power
Basically power -> efficiency and I'm sure if they had kept the old form factor they could have done all that and still have a relatively light and thin laptop. Just not this ridiculous compromised design that places form over function.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.