Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Here is an interesting observation: if Apple seized his phone after resigning, do they have the ability to access all the information on the phone? They claim privacy for all, but I secretly think they have an internal ability to "break" into a phone to get what happened......or do they run a modified OS that allows them in via a backdoor? Pure speculation on my part, but am curious just the same.
They likely have a mobile device manager (MDM) so that they can access his phone, and reset the password and the like. If you have a company phone/laptop/tablet etc. don't expect any information on there to be private. It's foolhardy to assume that if it's yours for work related purposes, that everything you do is private.
 
  • Like
Reactions: pratikindia
Tim Cook has already publically stated that they aren't working on building a car, but the software & sensors that drive them. He has also stated that Apple has no interest in manufacturing cars like Tesla but have more interest in working with the automotive industry as a whole.

Never trust Apple, just ask Motorola:

https://www.apple.com/newsroom/2004...r-to-Motorolas-Next-Generation-Mobile-Phones/

They thought Apple is just making software for phone makers. Five years later Apple exceeded Motorola in phone sales figures.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Mikey44
I don't think leaving the country would really be all that difficult... I'd imagine there's a massive number of cargo ships heading to China where you could either sneak your way on and off without anyone knowing, or could have the crew assist in smuggling yourself. Particularly if the Chinese government is involved, seems like it'd be easy.

No, of course not. But it looks like this nerd was a little weak on the whole criminal thing.
 
Here is an interesting observation: if Apple seized his phone after resigning, do they have the ability to access all the information on the phone? They claim privacy for all, but I secretly think they have an internal ability to "break" into a phone to get what happened......or do they run a modified OS that allows them in via a backdoor? Pure speculation on my part, but am curious just the same.
It sounds like he consented to the search and, presumably, gave them his passcodes/passwords as part of doing so.

Regardless, Apple certainly has the ability to use Apple Configurator (or other software) to deploy configuration profiles on company-provided devices that would possibly give them a few other avenues into the devices if he refused to cooperate.

He probably didn’t care much because the damage he sought to do was already done. They’d just caught him. He knew it.
 
So did the Chinese company actually acquire the Apple data?

They almost definitely have the data since, once you transfer data off of a corporate private network it is virtually impossible to stop its transmission to anyone you want via the internet... hell, he could have put it on drop box and offered them a teaser.

The fact that he made the trip to China where he allegedly would have been bartering the stolen IP (both hardware and software) makes this pretty much a slam dunk.

I don't know of too many American companies who engage in this kind of behavior but I suppose it periodically happens and they just don't get caught.... it does seem that China has a bit of a problem with respecting other company's intellectual property rights, patents, etc.
 
My understanding of multiple stories involving the ROKR is that its failure is what inspired management to create a phone that was truly Apple’s phone. Similarly, they also knew it was a risky bet (which obviously paid off bigtime).

I’d also say that Apple really isn’t interested in making cars. Margins and replacement cycles for cars aren’t what Apple is used to and would presumably prefer.
[doublepost=1531261063][/doublepost]
Up until two years ago, Jimmy John's had a Non Compete Clause that ALL employees had to sign. that included minimum wage store sandwich makers.
That’s completely irrelevant and I was already aware of Jimmy John’s having its employees sign a noncompete clause, but thanks.
 
My understanding of multiple stories involving the ROKR is that its failure is what inspired management to create a phone that was truly Apple’s phone. Similarly, they also knew it was a risky bet (which obviously paid off bigtime).

I’d also say that Apple really isn’t interested in making cars. Margins and replacement cycles for cars aren’t what Apple is used to and would presumably prefer.
But for car makers, letting Apple design some key components for their cars would be like letting the Alien live in their belly. It took five years after ROKR release for Apple to sell more phones than Motorola.
 
Last edited:
Its a special kind of sickness to rejoice when a fellow human being gets locked in a cage.
There is nothing sick about me.

The guy knowingly and willingly broke the law. And if he is convicted, he should serve the maximum sentence allowed by law for his crime(s).
[doublepost=1531261665][/doublepost]
I'm not sure how. He's now in China.
I don't see that said in the article.
 
But for car makers, letting Apple design some key components for their cars is like letting the Alien live in a belly. It took five years after ROKR release for Apple to sell more phones than Motorola.
Apple’s plan here is presumably to lock down enough IP and talent such that they have a formidable lead—or at least are an extremely attractive option—in autonomous driving software. Automakers are generally fumbling around and experimenting with autonomous driving functionality while Apple’s already deploying it in cars to move humans around. Why not outsource to a company that has already done a lot of the requisite R&D and has a working solution today instead of in 5 years?

Beyond that, I think it’s reasonable to say that they haven’t been driving lidar-capturing vehicles around the United States and other countries for no reason…and that the reason isn’t limited to Apple Maps, either.
 



The United States Federal Bureau of Investigation this week charged former Apple employee Xiaolang Zhang with theft of trade secrets, according to documents filed with the Northern District Court of California.

Zhang was hired at Apple in December of 2015 to work on Project Titan, developing software and hardware for use in autonomous vehicles. Zhang specifically worked on Apple's Compute Team, designing and testing circuit boards to analyze sensor data.

appleintellectualpropertydocument-800x435.jpg

The intellectual property disclosure on one of the documents Zhang stole
He was provided with "broad access to secure and confidential internal databases" due to his position, which contained trade secrets and intellectual property for the autonomous driving project that he ultimately ended up stealing.

In April 2018, Zhang took family leave from Apple following the birth of his child, and during that time, he visited China. Shortly after, he told his supervisor at Apple he was leaving the company and moving to China to work for XMotors, a Chinese startup that also focuses on autonomous vehicle technology.

Zhang's supervisor felt that he had "been evasive" during the meeting, which led Apple's New Product Security Team to begin an investigation, looking into Zhang's historical network activity and analyzing his Apple devices, which were seized when he resigned.

Apple found that just prior to Zhang's departure, his network activity had "increased exponentially" compared to the prior two years he had worked at Apple. He accessed content that included prototypes and prototype requirements, which the court documents specify as power requirements, low voltage requirements, battery system, and drivetrain suspension mounts.A review of recorded footage at Apple indicated Zhang had visited the campus on the evening of Saturday, April 28, entering both Apple's autonomous vehicle software and hardware labs, which coincided with data download times, and he left with a box of hardware.

In a second interview with Apple's security team, Zhang admitted to taking both online data and hardware (a Linux server and circuit boards) from Apple during his paternity leave. He also admitted to AirDropping sensitive content from his own device to his wife's laptop.

All of Apple's evidence was relayed to the FBI after the company's Digital Forensic Investigations team discovered that at least 60 percent of the data Zhang had downloaded and transferred to his wife's computer was "highly problematic." The FBI, in the court filing, describes the information as "largely technical in nature, including engineering schematics, technical reference manuals, and technical reports."

Of interest, the filing also gives a glimpse into Apple's security protocols. To access sensitive projects like Titan, an employee must be logged into Apple's virtual private network and must be granted "disclosure," a status that can only be granted when an employee is sponsored by another employee who already has access to the project, with an administrator reviewing all requests. Approximately 5,000 Apple employees have access to data on Apple's autonomous driving efforts, with the databases Zhang accessed further restricted to approximately 2,700 "core employees."

When hired, Zhang signed an Intellectual Property Agreement and attended a mandatory in-person secrecy training session, which he violated. Zhang was interviewed by the FBI in late June, where he admitted to stealing the information, and he was later arrested attempting to leave to China on July 7.

For stealing Apple's trade secrets, Zhang is facing up to 10 years in prison and a $250,000 fine.

It's no surprise that Apple cracked down on Zhang. Shortly before Zhang's theft was discovered, Apple sent out a lengthy cautionary memo to employees warning them against leaking data to the media. In the letter, Apple said that in 2017, it caught 29 leakers, with 12 of those individuals being arrested and charged.



Article Link: Former Apple Employee Charged With Theft of Trade Secrets Related to Autonomous Car Project


So Apple is building an automated car when they can’t even build a reliable Mac? Makes complete sense to me!
 
I'm not sure how. He's now in China.
Do you have a source for that? Best I can tell from the article, he was arrested when attempting to go to China and presumably stay there.

Did a federal judge allow him to leave? Because I don’t really see that happening, but one can always be surprised.
 
Do you have a source for that? Best I can tell from the article, he was arrested when attempting to go to China and presumably stay there.

Did a federal judge allow him to leave? Because I don’t really see that happening, but one can always be surprised.

That was my interpretation while reading the article (got the new job in China) but after reading it again, he's probably still here.
 
  • Like
Reactions: jonblatho
I don't condone what he did but he must have had a reason and it'd be interesting to find out what his plan was?

Was he going to sell it or take it to china and offer it up as his own work once employed? Seems like the most stupid idea ever as it'd have his mark all over it. I would dislike to see him locked up for this and put in with "real criminals", seems overkill for data theft/piracy. I know it shouldn't matter but he also didn't get away with it.

Apple could also be a car company by now, but instead we get ******** updates to phones and last years cpus in laptops with buggy OS's. Apple needs to be taking risks and I and many other die hard fans are a little fed up with them taking a backseat. I know I can't blame Apple but when you make people work on secret projects and pretty much can them, they might end up doing this kind of thing.
 
10 years in prison: Wasn't that the same amount of time those US basketball players were facing for shoplifting in China? Maybe the Chinese president calls in his favor for releasing them?
 
H1B is really hard to get and IT companies use it to bring in experts who are there to lead and design and not to do labor work. Chinese prosper when it comes to young software engineers, engineering in general, math and other creative sciences. They've really outscored US there and the most US can do is outsource them before China promises them something lucrative in order to get them to stay.

US was built on imported super brains. From well known documented Nazi scientist to very little know Iraqi scientists from last decade. Thinking that US alone has enough of brain power to maintain leading position in innovation and design will for sure lead to it's demise.

Things like this case will always happen but they will always be in minority when compared to how much good it brought to US market. Shutting down the visa program over something like this is insanity.

Wow, you obviously don't know a thing about the H1B program, especially how it has been abused for the last 20 years. The program had decent intents, but for the last 20 years it has been used for a source of cheap labor for tech companies.

Just search the web for "H-1B abuse" to educate yourself.

https://www.infoworld.com/article/3004501/h1b/proof-that-h-1b-visa-abuse-is-rampant-in-tech.html
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.