Apparently reading the freaking article doesn't matter when it comes to writing internet comments.So has he been to Court and entered a guilty plea, or does that not matter in trial by internet?
In a second interview with Apple's security team, Zhang admitted to taking both online data and hardware (a Linux server and circuit boards) from Apple during his paternity leave. He also admitted to AirDropping sensitive content from his own device to his wife's laptop.
I hope they lock this guy up for life.
There is no such thing as off hours in Silicon Valley![]()
Life? For stealing trade secrets?
A foreign national in the US is expected to follow US laws? Does that expectatoin apply to US nationals who go to other countries?
No alternative. How many Americans enroll in graduate school in science and engineering? Probably can be counted on one hand. The key is to have more Americans to study engineering. I'm not sure how that can be achieved.
Why was he allowed to download trade secrets. Surely this stuff should be read only with no option to print, copy or email.
So its ok to steal someone else's inventions ? Why dont you invent something for a change which could cost you a fortune, and then see it being stolen by someone, then see that someone makes a ton of money using your invention?Wow, you're a man with real empathy! We are talking about a human here not a dead product! Amazing how things are being worshipped and humans are being used these days! What a greedy world!
That's nothing. That is typical behavior for somebody that um, I dunno, got fired. Pack up your things and leave.The Washington Post said:Records and closed-circuit TV footage also showed Zhang entering the autonomous car software and hardware labs on April 28, documents state. He was seen leaving less than an hour later carrying a computer keyboard, some cables and a large box.
There are tons of studies related to penalties as a deterrence. Most agree that longer/harsher penalties aren't really a deterrent. Here's a short piece from the National Institute of Justice.
Regardless of his sentence, it's safe to assume his life career path is over. Don't think for a minute Apple doesn't insure this follows these people the entirety of their natural lives. As it should.![]()
Industrial espionage is normal thing maybe apples HR need to dig into background a little more on sensitive projects even if the diversity quota box needs ticking
No, he will eventually be returned to China (figure diplomatic intervention at a high level), and he will be able to work with no problems.
Wow, you obviously don't know a thing about the H1B program, especially how it has been abused for the last 20 years. The program had decent intents, but for the last 20 years it has been used for a source of cheap labor for tech companies.
Just search the web for "H-1B abuse" to educate yourself.
https://www.infoworld.com/article/3004501/h1b/proof-that-h-1b-visa-abuse-is-rampant-in-tech.html
this is exactly why I don't trust the Chinese... from their phone manufactures to people. communists will aways be stealing.
China is constantly stealing American technology (with the blessing of their government that even encourages people and tries to get them to do it), and more needs to be done about it. For one American tech companies should stop hiring so many Chinese nationals.
They teach, FOLLOW do not think for yourself... it's a great way of training people to stay inline. So when they send students over to learn, they remind them, regularly, they have family back in China (i.e. You work for us or else!)
Did vladi delete his post? I was about to say his analogy of H1-B workers to top rocket scientists that were sought after WW2 made no sense. Walk into almost any IT department in America and H1-B workers are walking around.
This is how propaganda and disinformation work...
Step 1: State an unprovable assumption that is designed to make the reader angry.
Step 2: State a second, unprovable assumption based on the first, unprovable assumption, along with a list of retaliatory responses that mirror a current political position that the author is attempting to justify.
Step 3: Try to get a blogger somewhere to focus on the unprovable assumptions and other inaccuracies as a way to justify a political stance, then peddle that blog to a large propaganda outlet like Fox News as a way to legitimize the misinformation.
You forgot Step 3. Maybe you're still working on that?
Yes, folks, this is how it's done.