Well first off - that computer doesn't exist yet and it's not exactly portable.If you are getting a maxed out Macbook Pro, I recommend the iMac Pro instead and you won't have the control strip and you will be happier.
I’m not entirely sure why my comment makes you think I am partaking in a mass moment. Apple have their faults, like all companies. But whinging online about a feature you don’t use to gain attention or traffic is rather arduous. I don’t use the Ethernet port on my MBP but I’m not going to type up a bleating blog post with complaints no one asked to hear. I don’t recall reading about Sally, Allie, Lucy or Gertie in Hogwarts, but it has been a few years since I revisited the series.
[doublepost=1504052823][/doublepost]
I wonder to how many decimal points the percentage of customers amount to that care about or use function or meta keys. I suspect <0.001%, maybe someone can fire an email to Schiller so we can find out.
Silly. Of course these customers will then use the new buttons for these functions.I've never met a single person that never changed their volume, brightness, or slept or turned off their Mac.
+1 for acknowledging there's two issues here: some people need the function keys, even if they also love the touch bar.Apple created a false choice here.
I wonder to how many decimal points the percentage of customers amount to that care about or use function or meta keys. I suspect <0.001%, maybe someone can fire an email to Schiller so we can find out.
They’re all on the Touch Bar, obviously? So, yes — I’m sure, thank you.That's quite a small number of users who never use a single function key, or the shift key, or the command key, or the option key, or the control key, or the ESC key, or the play/pause key, or the mute key,…
Are you sure about that <0.001%?
Journalism at its finest.A quick check of Twitter reveals dozens of users who believe the Touch Bar is a gimmick.
apple ex employee says he's fed up cleaning the toilets out so got sacked and now on a missionit is a gimmick no one asked for
Touch bar is a clever idea to test. The key is that it's tied to a mini-iOS implementation chip. Which means Apple "could" go full disk encryption per iPhones along with Activation Lock and all the other things. That's why there's zero removable SSD or RAM on these models.
I don't know about how I feel about my PC that locked down. Apple has done OK with iOS so far, but that's a bit much power to not abuse. On the other hand, with prying eyes everywhere, having a laptop where the data self destructs if the hardware is tampered with trying to skirt passwords isnt a bad thing.
Technically you can do this right now on a modern PC with TCM and OPAL SSDs but it's cumbersome and tricky to setup.. even harder to recover.
I prefer physical keys for the functions I use most like screen brightness, volume controls etc - The bar is a useless gimmick.
If Apple offered one without the Touch Bar I'd buy it for sure, even if it cost more money than the Touch Bar version.
... I really need function keys when I'm playing games - but the touch bar adds nothing to me at all, ever. Especially since I'm docked with a Magic Keyboard 90% of the time.
Add haptic feedback, two entire lines with and without it, and lower price a little.
Only thing is haters will still complain just because it doesn’t fit their own use case.
Agree. My Mid 2014 runs just fine without it. Waiting for the next gen MBP w/out a touchbar.
It would depend upon who the former employee was and in what capacity, as well as in overall computer experience. This guy has a bit:Who the heck cares what a former employee thinks? I turned down a job offer from Apple years ago. Should my complaining blog posts have some special elevated status?
This reminds me of the arguments back and forth over inclusion of the phone jack on iPhones. People satisfied with bluetooth and/or dongles didn't mind its being gone. People who wanted to use high quality wired headphones / speakers with a dedicated jack minded quite a bit. The contention is that Apple decided in favor of one group over the other, without offering options. That would appear to be the issue here - it would be nice if the top end MBP had options with/without the touch bar.It's actually extremely useful for many people. Just because you don't do anything that warrants a use for it doesn't make it a gimmick.
I think that the touch bar was sort of a compromise gesture to compete with PCs with full touch screen capabilities. I tend to think Apple will eventually go to a full touch screen with perhaps extra features over PC offerings. I personally don't find touch screens useful on laptops, nor do I find physical keyboards to be much use on phones or tablets, but as long as both touch screens and full keyboard functionality are offered in one package, so be it.I'm also in the boat where I want a higher end MacBook with more ports, but I don't want the touch bar. For me a few things stick out. First, a year after its release, Mac faithful are still split if the Touch Bar was worth the money (many or possibly most still prefer or would be fine with the function keys). Second, the touch bar just doesn't seem necessary, doesn't seem to solve a big problem or bring revolutionary change as touted by Apple (i.e. unlike Touch ID or even 3D Touch). Lastly, there is a saying, "imitation is the sincerest form of flattery." This was supposed to be the MacBooks killer feature, but which other Windows laptop manufacturer is trying to quickly emulate it? As far as I can tell, none, which to me says a lot. Kinda like if BMW introduced a "killer feature", charged extra for it, created confusion in the BMW enthusiast community, and not a single other car manufacturer tried to emulate it or even bother with it. Again, maybe more than anything, this fact tells the story.
100% agree. I finally just set it to show the control keys all the time. The app tools are mostly useless and it's frustrating to always have to tap to open the control strip.