Perhaps I wasn't clear enough. I meant visually looking at the Apple maps. There isn't enough visual information such as street names to orient yourself, unlike Google Maps. This I believe is a design issue that Eddie would be in charge of that might not be very simple, but definitely affordable in relation to how much it would aid the customer experience.
With no disrespect, no research is needed for the simple claims that I make. Simply turn on your phone and discover that the music player interface is less intuitive and slower to navigate than before the time that Eddie Cue was managing that department. Even with all great new features that the Apple maps upcoming updates are promising that Eddie is in change of, the street name issue has not been addressed, and it's a central component of a map. These are just a couple examples that I'm posting here. After research on past posts to extensively list out problems that cropped up in a department after Eddie was put in charge, I don't feel the need to rehash what everyone else here doesn't give a **** about.
Temper temper.
While I agree, I think iTunes has always been under Eddie’s watchful eye, and many had felt after Dre and Iovine took most of the streaming aspects over, felt Eddie may have been too free in letting “Boz” present so early on. Her presence was a lot better received than when Iovine presented Apple Music yet her personality want well “acceptable” to the Apple attendees.
I see what you mean by Maps and street names being an after thought where by the explicit need to zoom in so deeply to find a street name, especially at an intersection. That can get very annoying. I’ll agree her that yes it shouldn’t updve been very easy for Eddies team to implement, curious as to why?
PS: I find my use of the word “acceptable” can be inferenced by many on the forums well enough. It’s sad Apple has become driven by the yuppies when it was lifted up and championed by the hippies in the golden era that would have allowed varying personalities to work within and be around the company.
[doublepost=1536202952][/doublepost]
He’s an idiot and proof any fool can get into a position of wealth if they are lucky.
Apple should have sacked him long ago.
That’s odd. There is an article specifically stating he got to executive role due to his prowess with negotiations that Steve Jobs was very impressed with and was elevated by Jobs due to that. Seems it worked out VERY well for Apple’s content within Music:
Music Conglomerates agreeing to track and albums pricing and distributional rights and licensing restrictions.
ITunes juke box.
Apple Music Festivals (gone now) yet features top artists attending: Timberlake, U2, Drake, yeah bankable names big budget performances.
Being the first to legally license and sell Beatles online (one and then some done!)
Logic Pro purchase from long time software partner EMagic here most of the team included the founder Gerhardt stuck with Apple for quite a while - and longer than Siri’s founders did.
But yeah Eddies track record proves he’s a lucky fool who should be fired because you fail to see what he has accomplished over the decades. This is what the world is coming too ... small mistakes and damn into the pit fires with you.
[doublepost=1536203310][/doublepost]
How was Scott Forstall a threat to Tim Cook’s leadership? Steve Jobs made Cook CEO. No one else in the executive team could stand Forstall (which is one of the reasons he was let go). Rumors were Bob Mansfield refused to be in the same room with Forstall unless Cook was there. Forstall wasn’t a threat to anybody.
There have been many reports Forstall was being groomed by Jobs for CEO role. Maybe that may have been false and mistaken due to their close friendship ... but he had stage presence and the programming skills like very few others - I’d wager more than Federighi did until he (Forstall) was ousted. The issue was only within the software team that disliked him - most likely because he was so deiven and eyed towards excellence (thinking about the article of him using a monocle to view iOS icons submitted by early developers for prestige quality). Back then iOS was a leap ahead of Android in terms of real system UI quality which baffles me how Anyone before 4.0 KitKat would want to use Android.
I’m sure Forstall was a hard Nut especially with his sense of humour that going angry would leave lasting scars.
But Time Machine
iPhone iOS 2,3, and 4 presentations and Siri initial 3 updates yeah ... he was Jobs on stage.