Hopefully the robots improve QC.
It isn't the 1980's anymore guys, China is far from the cheapest place in the world for labor.Replacing some of the cheapest human labor in the world with robots... why do this?
Actually at one time there was a law in China that prohibited automating production to displace workers. The exception would be work that simply couldn't be done by hand. So in this regards I expect Apple to automate to transition to new electronics assembly technology. I have wondered about all that Saphire they are producing and the potential for that material to be used as a substrate for some sort of chip on board technology.While it could be some kind of quality thing where the needed robots will do the job better than humans, I suspect it's a cost thing- the robots will reduce the cost of labor.
Conceptually, that would mean that either a) the price of what the robots make could come down and Apple could still get its margin or b) the price of what the robots make could stay the same or go up and increase Apple's margin. I wonder which one Apple will choose.
"each robot will be able to assemble an average of 30,000 devices"
During what period of time?
Is that 300,000 smartphones per day?
Is that 300,000 smartphones per week?
Is that 300,000 smartphones per year?
Is that 300,000 smartphones per lifetime of each robot?
You don't think the complainers will just move the goal post? Haters gonna hate, after allAll the posters who complain all the time that Apple shouldn't use "slave labour" in China will surely be rejoicing. Or maybe it will be a wakeup call for them that these are jobs that people actually want.
I don't know which is worse: continuing to pay relatively cruddy wages to workers for boring factory jobs
I don't know which is worse: continuing to pay relatively cruddy wages to workers for boring factory jobs or getting rid of the workers and replacing them with robots.
I don't understand why each robot can only assemble 30,000 iPhones. What happens after that - do the robots fall apart or are they unionized and they get to retire?
I also wonder who is designing and who owns these robots - Foxconn or Apple? If it's not Foxconn and the iPhone and/or other Apple products can be completely assembled by robots, then why not have factories around the world (including the U.S.), not just in China?
pre-robots era: "omg apple is so inhuman with their workers in china"
post-robots era: "omg apple's workers in china are inhuman -- literally"
it would be interesting if those robots could also assemble themselves, and not just iphones
I wonder what will happen to the employment situation in China when Chinese factories start using robots instead of workers.
Someone has to design and maintain those robots, so no jobs are being "lost".
All the posters who complain all the time that Apple shouldn't use "slave labour" in China will surely be rejoicing. Or maybe it will be a wakeup call for them that these are jobs that people actually want.
Anyone who looses their job because it's replaced by one of these robots should just get a job at the factory where they make these robots![]()
Stop kidding yourself. These are not jobs people "actually" want, these are jobs people are forced to choose amongst after being forced off their lands in rural areas. They may be glad for the little bit of extra money to send back to their families, but they would not choose these jobs if given a real choice. No one would, not even you.
Instead of gloating over what you think is a point scored against those who have criticized the treatment of factory workers, maybe do some reading up on the history of how China has industrialized over the past 30 years.