Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Which one would be better to have?

I was wondering what would be better. To have the current
macbook pro 17 inch model running at 2.16 Core Duo or to eventually get a macbook with C2D running at 2.00?
 
Well... I guess from above... I'm a fanboy. :rolleyes:

I agree, Dell / IBM / Daewoo ( :p ) All produce laptops much cheaper. Matter of a fact, run out and buy one... right now.

However, please ask to have your Macrumors account deleted and go browse dellrumors.com.

The C2D will appear in the MB and MBP (just when Apple's damn good and ready). Until then, sit tight.
 
I suppose next Tuesday, then

The upshot of no new MBP today is that Apple may deliver more than just a chip upgrade. :)

On the other hand, if they are having problems, I applaud Apple for not rushing a new product to market just to meet some artificial deadline. That's not to say the new MBP's will be flawless. But I appreciate any company that shows the discipline to hold shipment so that it can ensure the majority of its customers a great experience with its products. In a nutshell, that's the reason why I won't buy another Dell or recommend Dell computers to my friends and family.

As for why I won't buy a Yonah MBP: $3000+ should at least buy me several months of the best technology, not one week. Just MHO.
 
Which one would be better to have?

I was wondering what would be better. To have the current
macbook pro 17 inch model running at 2.16 Core Duo or to eventually get a macbook with C2D running at 2.00
 
macman4291 said:
I was wondering what would be better. To have the current
macbook pro 17 inch model running at 2.16 Core Duo or to eventually get a macbook with C2D running at 2.00

Yes, we saw you the first time...

It depends on what you are using your computer for. If you are average Joe, it doesn't matter.
 
Butthead said:
Uh huh, by your sig line can we infer your 'heavy' FCS work is with puny bandwidth highly-compressed, lowest of the low quality SD DV25 work? How many streams of uncompressed Standard Def. video can you do real-time with that PB 1.33, which has what, a single 5.4k drive? How many streams of compressed (higher bandwidth) 2k 1080p HD video do you edit regularly?



im not saying i do alot of editing on my PB, i use the quad at home or work for that. the point is, is the OP really needing the latest and greatest becuase he has to work on multiple streams of HD content in real time? or just becuase he wants to have the "coolest" lappy out.

if you actually USE your machine and really need it, then fine, but crying becuase your 5 month old laptop is just so outdated, or whining about when are they gonna update the iMac that is a month old, well then i dont have alot of sympathy for you.

And as far as editing on a G4, i use a 733 digital audio to edit small projects. Its not lightning fast, but it works fine. And most people arent even running apps as powerful as final cut studio apps, more often is photoshop and office. In which case, there really is very little need to upgrade so often.


and i just love your HD comments. Um, yeah, id say 75% of the final cut users here have NEVER worked with HD anyway, so your argument is irrelivant. I love HD, i think its a great format. I have worked with some HD content, not alot. But the fact is, many consumers dont even have HD sets yet, or if they do, dont subscribe to HD channels, or dont have a blueray or HD DVD player. So yeah, all this HD capability is cool in theory, but the delivery system is still a few years away. Thats why i still do most of my work in SD. Its fully compatible with todays consumers electronics, unlike HD which is basically limited to HD disc (which are few and far between), play directly off an HD camera (again, i dont know anyone with one yet as far as consumers) or watch it on your computer. COOOL!


The point i am trying to make is, there are so many people here that just whine to whine. I am a die hard apple user. I buy just about everything the sell. I am also considered an "early adopter" - i was subscribed to XM when they had less than 500k members, I have been running HD at home for a decade, have had DVD players in my cars since 1998. So, i like new technology, but i think its silly to continually upgrade a computer every few months because a newer one comes out.
 
i doubt it will be next tuesday. i say next monday because that is the day the photokina event is held.
 
mencles said:
If they don't update their MBs before October '06 - I see myself forced to buy a PC Laptop- because I really need one for university and I am not buying an outdated product.
ditto though i am looking at used iBooks for now, sadly they are very hard to come by.:(
 
jericho878 said:
The upshot of no new MBP today is that Apple may deliver more than just a chip upgrade. :)

On the other hand, if they are having problems, I applaud Apple for not rushing a new product to market just to meet some artificial deadline.

Apple's not going to just wait to release Merom MBP's without a damned good reason. I'm betting they've run into heat issues, or some other problem, which has forced them to delay. They already have Merom chips, they're using them in the iMacs. And with other computer makers selling C2D units, Apple surely wouldn't just wait for next week's photo event to release updated MBP's.

I'm frustrated in waiting, too. I just hope that whatever issue has arisen, is quickly solved ......

:cool:

iBorg
 
iBorg20181 said:
Apple's not going to just wait to release Merom MBP's without a damned good reason. I'm betting they've run into heat issues, or some other problem, which has forced them to delay. They already have Merom chips, they're using them in the iMacs. And with other computer makers selling C2D units, Apple surely wouldn't just wait for next week's photo event to release updated MBP's.

I'm frustrated in waiting, too. I just hope that whatever issue has arisen, is quickly solved ......

:cool:

iBorg

I figure it's more likely supply issues -- Apple's first allocation went to the iMac.
 
macman4291 said:
I was wondering what would be better. To have the current
macbook pro 17 inch model running at 2.16 Core Duo or to eventually get a macbook with C2D running at 2.00

Isn't that the same as asking should I get the top-of-the-line MBP today or wait a few months for a C2D MB? Presumably, if you can afford the MBP today and can possibly wait several months for a revision, why not get the top-of-the-line MBP then?
 
Well Tuesday came and went and no Merom on MacBook Pro. I wonder what this means......
Could it mean that the chip shortage is being a real issue or could it be that there is a major change to the box?
Maybe a memory module on the motherboard to it boots in 1 to 2 seconds or a major redesign of the machine so it is a lot more desirable? Could it be better memory addressing with capability for the full 4 gig memory addressing?

Lets start a new rumor, LOL.

The way I figure, if it is not an issue with chip shortages, then it is something big, a change to Merom would not be something important enough for to be part of the special event. Just my opinion.
 
Did iMac update on Wednesday, September 6th, or Tuesday the 5th?

All the news reports are for the 6th, so I'm confused. If it was in fact the 6th (a Wednesday instead of a Tuesday), maybe there is still some hope for a mbp update tomorrow.

Either way.... I need to get a damn life. This is going to be mac #1 for me and I can't stop following every damn bit of news that comes up.

Edit: reading some other threads, etc: I realize it may have just been on Wednesday because of the Labor Day holiday on the Monday prior. Oh well. I'll still check for it tomorrow morning (and the next morning)... patients is a virtue right?
 
rcm3 said:
Either way.... I need to get a damn life. This is going to be mac #1 for me and I can't stop following every damn bit of news that comes up.

Yes, this forum can be like that. RUN. Run while you still have a mind of your own! Bwahahahahahahahahahahahahaha!
 
Cart Before the Horse?

I can't believe this! I ordered my shiny new MacBook nearly 4 weeks ago. Last I heard they will finally ship in one more week, then another week to actually arrive. So count it- 6 weeks to get the notebook that will be outdated within a month of me powering it up. They better figure out how to meet demand on the stuff they released just a few months ago before they start upgrading, IMO. I work with Macs at school, but this is my first personal purchase. Another teacher ordered a MacBook Pro with no modifications and it only took 4 days to arrive! It better be the greatest little piece of technology I've ever owned because my work is suffering without it right now.... Is Apple always this slow or am I just accustomed to the fast-as-lightening speed of Dell?
 
just a reminder for all of the people who are hungry for a 12" mbp...

do not forget this posting a few months ago from mosxr.com.

http://www.macosxrumors.com/articles/2006/03/30/ultra-thin-12-inch-mac-book-pro-on-the-way/

i've been backtracking on a lot of their postings over the last year and they tend to not post stuff that they don't think is reliable. they have pretty much been spot on everytime. i am 99% sure the new merom mbp's will be coming on monday. could a 12" also be possible? i sure as hell hope so.
 
rcm3 said:
Did iMac update on Wednesday, September 6th, or Tuesday the 5th?

All the news reports are for the 6th, so I'm confused. If it was in fact the 6th (a Wednesday instead of a Tuesday), maybe there is still some hope for a mbp update tomorrow.

Either way.... I need to get a damn life. This is going to be mac #1 for me and I can't stop following every damn bit of news that comes up.

Edit: reading some other threads, etc: I realize it may have just been on Wednesday because of the Labor Day holiday on the Monday prior. Oh well. I'll still check for it tomorrow morning (and the next morning)... patients is a virtue right?
It was a Wednesday update, but possibly due to the holiday.
 
tekmoe said:
just a reminder for all of the people who are hungry for a 12" mbp...

do not forget this posting a few months ago from mosxr.com.

http://www.macosxrumors.com/articles/2006/03/30/ultra-thin-12-inch-mac-book-pro-on-the-way/

i've been backtracking on a lot of their postings over the last year and they tend to not post stuff that they don't think is reliable. they have pretty much been spot on everytime. i am 99% sure the new merom mbp's will be coming on monday. could a 12" also be possible? i sure as hell hope so.

Were they referencing the macbook as opposed to the macbook pro considering the end of 2nd quarter release schedule has been over since the end of June? They thought it was going to be a MBP but apple ended up introducing the MB instead? I'm still not sure about a 12" MBP.
 
New rumor (mine)

Update on 9/25 all MBP's will be upgraded to Merom and will have instant reboot capabilities, 15" MBP will have 4 memory slots for a total of 8 gig memory and the 17" MBP due to all the space will have 6 memory slots for a total of 12 gig of memory. No issues with large photo files and great with FCP also.

Now we are cooking with Gas.
 
I will not be doing editing of any kind. Nor is my soon to be MBP for any sort of high power requiring work. It is for school, for games, and for all around computer usage.

Maybe a core duo would do just fine. But I am NOT going to pay 2500$ for a macbookpro that is completely outdated. Videocard is old, processor is old, lacking FW 800, lacking 8x and dual layer burning, etc etc etc

Why buy it when I can wait a bit? How can anybody criticize this, as it is just purely logical. Apple is obviously making a killing from each MBP they sell at this time because the prices have dropped so low, yet the actual laptop price is still the same.
 
Why doesn't Apple just make the Macbook Pro about .05 - .1 inches thicker. .1 inch could give us a bigger battery, bigger heatsinks, and more airflow. Before the 17" came out we could argue that an extra .1 inch would allow for DL burning in the 15" model but lo and behold comes the 17" MBP with DL burning and amazingly the same thickness as the 15" that was just too thin for a DL burner!

Certain individuals are puppets to Jobs' agenda.
 
n00bst3r said:
Before the 17" came out we could argue that an extra .1 inch would allow for DL burning in the 15" model but lo and behold comes the 17" MBP with DL burning and amazingly the same thickness as the 15" that was just too thin for a DL burner!


the 17 can handle the thicker DL burner because it sits far enough to the right of the track pad for it to clear it entirely. on the 15 the trackpad overlaps the footprint of the burner not allowing it to fit.

certain newbies should learn the facts before they speak.
 
Does anybody know the best way to make the most money if I wanted to sell my 17 inch Macbook Pro in time to get the newer C2D Macbook Pro when it comes out. It has never gone anywhere, and barely used, it also has an applecare protection registered.

Thanks
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.