Pressure said:Here's to Hector Ruiz...keep dreaming buddy!
The day AMD can give better R&D support than Intel while offering a better product road map, that may be the time but not in the foreseeable future.
To further explain this, AMD have trouble developing chip sets for their own processors, so why would they think they had a chance to help develop others?
AMD is in the process of buying ATI, who supplies most/all of the chipsets for current AMD-powered laptops.
Presumably this is - at least in part - to be able to better compete with Intel on the "complete platform" front.
I wasn't aware of AMD having trouble developing chipsets per-se -- in the past they supplied them initially until the third party markets got decent support out there, then dropped them. I think due to AMD's limited fab capacity and limited development resources they preferred to concentrate on other areas, but this is purely opinion.
The real issue I see is they will still have fairly limited fab capacity.
Well, that and for the moment, Intel's Core-2 line of processors are better performers.
Given the K9/K10 designs were dropped a while back and all that's been announced is K8L - an evolutionary design based on a "wider" K8, it remains to be seen what else they'll come out with.
I figure Apple may at some point go AMD but I can't see it being any time soon. With in a decade, perahps...