Another thing to note about the comments from Intel. Why would they really need to be involved much if it was simply dropping a new chip in the current model? Could they be using a new motherboard/chipset for the new MBP's?
Perhaps FW800 or pre-802.11n (like what is found in the iMacs). Maybe they needed Intel's help to switch from ATI to nVidia for the GPU?
Perhaps FW800 or pre-802.11n (like what is found in the iMacs). Maybe they needed Intel's help to switch from ATI to nVidia for the GPU?
MacinDoc said:I wouldn't use the expression "just gotten it done" about a product that was introduced 7 months ago (meaning it was finished 8-9 months ago). And since Intel likely had a hand in the MacBooks, and as James just pointed out, the Mac Pros, which were more recent than the MPBs, and this quotation specifically refers to MBPs, I suspect that this is a slip that indicates that the MBPs are indeed ready to go when, as another AI article suggested, Apple Marketing sees fit to pull the trigger. Let's hope for the sanity of those stragglers still on the Photokina thread that it happens soon!