Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
I've quickly rechecked and I was right. I selected the built in camera, the GeForce 7600, wireless LAN AND Bluetooth, Intel *C2D* 2GHz, 1GB RAM on a single RAM stick, 100GB hard disk and DVD burner. The price is definitely $1529.99.

I hardly see a difference between XP Home and Pro which is why I selected Home. The average user will be happy with Home. Furthermore, even if you DO go ahead and pick XP Pro, it's only another $80 and the final price is still well below the MBP.
 
Multimedia said:
I agree with you at the theoretical level and would not buy a CD MB or MBP for that and many other reasons. But you have got to admit the Sony comparison is somewhat bogus due to the fact it cannot run OS X which to many of us is a deal breaker in the first place.

I agree, I can't see anything at all happening in the next few years that will make *me* switch back to PCs. My last 4 laptops have all been PowerBooks or MacBook Pros and I personally wouldn't buy the Sony myself as I am never going back to using Windows.

However, that doesn't stop me from admitting that the current MBP is wildely overpriced in comparison to the Sony, and many many other PC laptops out there. And, as I've said earlier in the thread, I am sure many potential switchers will have the same realisation and be put off buying a Mac laptop for this very reason. I really think it's a poor show for Apple to be charging substantially more for the last generation of CPUs than others are charging for the current generation.
 
Multimedia said:
Digital Broadcast HD from CBS, NBC, PBS and Fox.Toast 7.1 UB has that compress Dual Layer to Single Layer feature.The 2GHz MB is just as strong as the MBP. Playback should be fine out of it. I am compressing Broadcast HD to DVD Images - not media - then ripping from those images with Handbrake to further compress them to mp4 files that are almost as good as the originals. This two stage process takes longer than going from the originals with say a QT export. But the result is far superior. Using only 2 cores to do this will take you a lot of time. Even with 4 cores on the Quad G5 or Mac Pro it takes too long. That's why I'm looking forward to the Dual Clovertown 8-core Mac Pro this Winter.

Broadcast HD is very low bandwidth, less than current consumer DV (DV25 as in 25Mbs, megabits). Panasonic's 'budget' HD camcorder uses their proprietary DV100 format. Even uncompressed standard def. video takes well over 100, just under 200MB, STR's to edit reliably. Depends on what format/compression schemes you are looking at in HD. How about 4k res, uncompressed to compressed ;).

"The demonstration of trans-Pacific digital cinema post-production at iGrid 2005 was a unique experiment meant to simulate film “dailies,” the Hollywood term for just-shot film that is roughly edited each day during a movie production, intended for review, typically, by the producer, director and cinematographer. This experiment emulated a multi-site production digital dailies session scenario, where the cinematographer is on one continent, the colorist on another and the director on his laptop in a screening room in his East Hampton summer house, or in a DI suite in Hollywood.

In Japan, the Silicon Graphics Prism visualization system with eight Intel Itanium2 processors was running The Pixel Farm PFPlay software in the Linux environment, alongside a 10TB SGI InfiniteStorage RM660 system with 1.6GByte/sec of I/O bandwidth. Keio University was taking uncompressed 4K digital content off the DALSA Origin digital cinema camera, which features the world’s only 4K digital output, and feeding the 4K data directly into the Prism system. The “editor” in Japan created a playlist from several 4K uncompressed clips on the Prism system using Pixel Farm PFPlay software. The NTT JPEG 2000 encoder took the uncompressed 4K data at over 6Gbps and encoded it as a 250Mbps JPEG 2000 stream in real-time and sent it from Japan over fiber optic networks to San Diego where it was uncompressed using the NTT JPEG2000 decoder and played back on a prototype Sony SXRD 4K projector (3840 x 2160 pixel resolution) installed in Calit2’s new 200-seat auditorium.

After reviewing the initial play-list at full 4K resolution, the “director”, located in San Diego, was able to use SGI’s Visual Area Networking (VAN) technology to share control of the Silicon Graphics Prism located in Japan, modify the play-list and review the new 4K results as the changes were made—all without moving the 4K content data back and forth between the sites. As a result of this long-distance, collaborative editing session, the remote director and production staff were able to leverage powerful, interactive post-production processes at resolutions not available before.


"


Let's just hope there will be either a major upgrade now, or they (Apple marketing, I just love that AI speculation, so accurate, lol) just hold off (like this hasn't happened before with the PB line) until MWSF, and annouce/pre-shipping Santa Rosa platform, with all the goodies included.

Maybe even a monster (well the 24in iMac is huge, almost ungainly sitting side by side to the 20in) 19/20in laptop with Blu-ray HD burner...like this heavyweight

http://www.engadget.com/2006/06/08/acer-aspire-9800-with-hd-dvd-in-the-wild/

Right now, Apple needs to get off their arses and give us latest tech, damn it!


2k res screen (OLED power saving tech would be even nicer), in at least the 17in model, HD Blu-ray ...Panasonic had a slot-loader prototype on view last 2005 NAB, so maybe it's starting in production now???.

http://www.engadget.com/2006/06/13/lgs-xnote-s1-p555k-laptop-with-hd-dvd-player/

http://www.engadget.com/2006/09/28/samsungs-m55-hd-dvd-laptop-yes-HD-DVD/

Sony's Blu-ray tray loader is already on the market, common Apple, get with the program damn it, 2k res screen & HD burner like everyone else already! Put in a just annouce for the Asus, slim laptop, Geforce Go 7700 too (no x1800 or GG7900GeForce Go 7900 GTX vs. GeForce Go 7900 GS: Mobile GPU Battle are not an option in such a thin notebook-consume too much power, generate too much heat, the GG7700 performs slightly better than the GG7600, and consumes the same power, which makes it a nice upgrade to an x1600...sorry gamers looking for high res/quality, it's a no go when running of limited capacity batteries. Crap, Sony annouced this last May!
http://forevergeek.com/gadgets/sonys_first_bluray_laptop_appears.php

http://news.com.com/Sonys+Blu-ray+notebook+arriving+next+week/2100-1041_3-6082914.html

http://pocket-lint.co.uk/review.php?reviewId=1564

While we're at it , how about a optional Raid of Samsung supplied 64GB SDD's to replace the hard drive (instead of 160GB perp. tech, HDD's)? Won't save much in power as laptop HDD's consume only 3w max, compared to CPU&GPU (see link above to GG7900GS v GG7900GTX512MB, notice you can't even run the 7900GTX512MB on battery power, it must be plugged in for 'performace' mode, essentially unusable for intensive gaming in battery mode), and LCD power requirements around 50-90watts. Such your batter dry in 1hr or less with demanding operations.
 
maverick808 said:
I disagree, I think the current MBPs are a ripoff. You can buy a Sony VGN-FE790 with a 2.33GHz C2D for under $2000 (see http://www.sonystyle.com/is-bin/INT...IONotebookComputers_FE_Series&Dept=computers).

Now please don't start flaming me saying things like "okay, go buy that damn Sony then". I am simply pointing out that competitors are building comparable machines with the next generation CPU and charging $500 less. With that in mind, I do feel the current MBP price is a bit much. I myself bought a 2GHz MBP back in January and I was more than happy to pay that price then. However, 9 months later and I don't expect to be paying the same price for a machine that is 9 months old (the ONLY difference to the one I bought is that they now have an extra 166MHz).

Basically, the MBP wasn't a rip off 9 months ago, but in 9 months the machine hasn't changed and neither has the price, so today, in my view, it is indeed a rip off.

I'm not sure if the link you posted ends up taking you to the same page, but I'm looking at the FE series, which is what that page took me to, and the fastest C2D is 1.83GHz. I don't see any C2D's listed on there (or CD's for that matter) that are 2GHz or faster.

IMHO, the "FE" Series is not comparable to a MBP. It is closer to the MB, especially with the Intel integrated graphics. The AR270 is more comparable to the MBP as far as options available, although I will note this version has only a 17" screen.


So, I clicked on the "Build Your Own" link, and here were the results:


The base model for an "FE" Series was $949, which had a 40G HD, and a celeron M.

Bringing it up as close as possible to the current 15.4" mid-range MBP w/o customization, produces a BTO Sony that's about $2225, with a C2D 2.33GHz.



For the AR series,

Bringing it up as close as possible to the current 15.4" mid-range MBP w/o customization, produces a BTO Sony that's about $2660, with a C2D 2.33GHz.

If comparing to the 17", to be fair since the AR is a 17" model, produces a BTO Sony that's $2740.



For the FE system, there was a note:

"Shipping availability:
Production begins on or about Oct 16, 2006. Please allow 5-7 days after this date for production to complete."

And THEN add on the time to get it from them to you.



The shipping note for the AR was:

"Shipping availability:
Please allow 3-5 business days for production to complete."



Either way, I'm personally NOT impressed with the Sony line. Not to mention the Windows factor, which I just simply refuse to use unless I have absolutely no choice (like company provided, etc.).



While it might be a "little cheaper", the difference isn't worth it to me.

Not saying that Apple's pricing on the current line isn't a bit much 9 months after they've been out, but it still isn't like it's THAT bad of a deal.



I think the big argument on your position with the Sony reference is that they are shipping, or will soon, C2D's in at least some of their lines.

While very true I don't see a big advantage over their C2D line, other than having a C2D and not a CD.



I do agree that on some fronts, with some consumers, it could be an issue with Apple not having the C2D yet, but overall I don't think it's hurting them at the moment. However it may become more of a problem if there isn't some sort of update prior to the Holiday Shopping Fiasco, but that's still a good 6-7 weeks away.


Quickly glancing the a couple other manufacturers, they're in about the same position.

Other than having a C2D in a few models, there isn't any real comparison.

Simply having a C2D isn't a justification that something is better overall in my mind.

That's just the way I see it though, FWIW.
 
ram prices

actually, if you buy 2gb ram yourself on the MBP you will 1/3 the price at apple AND you will have the 1gb that comes with the mbp. Anyone done this, and know if this is smart? If there is any problems with this?
 
Okay, well there's no point doing comparisons for ever. As I've admitted, I wouldn't buy the Sony myself, although I do acknowledge it's a more powerful machine for less money.

Obviously, everyone involved in this discussion must be after a Merom MBP. Let's all just get back to tapping our fingers waiting for it to happen. Every morning I get up and check the store, and the very hour they're out I'll have put in my order.
 
Deputy-Dawg said:
Awe come on Maverick!! To achieve the 2079.99 price you had to configure it with a 40 Gb hard disk and accept Windows XP Home Edition. Hardly comparable to the HD and OS in the Mac package. There is an old farm saying that goes something like, "Clean corn costs a bit more but we can give you a real bargin on some that has been through the horse once". Please, I prefer the clean corn.

Let's not forget that some of the little options need to be checked as well, depending on the model, to make it somewhat comparable.

IE: Gotta have the photo software, and better video software (mid range, not premium) to compete with what comes standard on the MBP.

As well as upgrading (on some models) for the updated wireless (a/b/g), AND bluetooth.

Also, if it has the intel graphics, it ain't even close to a MBP.


[Edit]
Oh, also don't forget to bump that up to a single 1GB stick of RAM.
[/edit]
 
Guys...
it's not PC vs Mac argument.

Maverick is trying to point out that Apple currently charges hefty premium for their 9 month old MBP. Yes. Apple has always been charging the premium.
Just cost wise, (not based on your own preference) Apple Mac OS w/ iLife costs at most $250. So baseline MBP is about 1750 Hardware wise.

I totally agree that it was such a great deal back then, but nowadays, it's too high.
Exclude the price of Windows XP on any PC laptops, and it's more apparent.
And MBP is a PRO machine. C2D in consumer iMac while CD in MBP is pretty much nonsense to me.

I purchased MBP on March with no hesitation.
But if you ask me nowadays, I wouldn't.
Would you buy CD USD $1999 MBP now?
 
ThunderLounge said:
Let's not forget that some of the little options need to be checked as well, depending on the model, to make it somewhat comparable.

IE: Gotta have the photo software, and better video software (mid range, not premium) to compete with what comes standard on the MBP.

As well as upgrading (on some models) for the updated wireless (a/b/g), AND bluetooth.

Also, if it has the intel graphics, it ain't even close to a MBP.

Ach, I already replied to this. Deputy-Dawg made a mistake, my screenshots clearly show that I *DID* pick 100GB drive, DVD burner, 1GB RAM on 1 memory stick. I *DID* pick the non-integrated video, NVidia 7600, and I *DID* pick wireless 802.11 AND Bluetooth. I also picked the built-in USB camera.

Please, I don't want to get into doing comparison after comparison. It's simply an undeniable fact that the MBP is underpowered and overpriced when compared to the majority of PC laptops out there TODAY. As Gurutech points out, it was a FANTASTIC bargain 9 months ago... and I bought one then. I just don't think it's a fair price to pay for it today.

And I'm not saying I'm not going to buy one when they are updated. My next laptop is definitely, without a doubt, 100%, going to be a MacBook Pro. However, I'm not blind to the fact that the current MBP is overpriced when compared to other laptops.

As I already picked all the right options the first time, and included screenshots, and went back and rechecked all my choices, I'm not saying anything more on comparisons. The rest of you can feel free to moan about how my Sony selection didn't include a pulsating sleep light or whatever until your hearts are content.
 
Gurutech said:
I purchased MBP on March with no hesitation.
But if you ask me nowadays, I wouldn't.
Would you buy CD USD $1999 MBP now?


If I needed to buy one today, yes. In fact it wouldn't be the entry level either, and I wouldn't think twice about it. Even though the C2D most likely will offer something better (besides the C2D increase), the current line isn't ancient by any means, and will definitely provide the power needed for what my usage would be. Sure I would see an increase in performance with some of the video work, and probably the photo and graphic work as well, but the current one will still do what it needs to do, and do it well.

There's always going to be something better on the horizon, no matter when you buy. The simple question is how far out is it. With the (hopefully) impending release of an update, if you can wait a bit then cool. If not, the current line isn't so far behind that it would be like running a G4 with 256k of RAM.

While unfortunate, none of us know how long the wait will be. It could be a few days, a few weeks, or a horrid few months.
 
Wait. There's a pulsating sleep light option with the Sony. There goes the only reason I wanted a MBP.

Now I can happily go and buy the Sony :D

J/K...Have to pass the time somehow as I wait for the C2D updates, or as I call them the real MBP, and not the MBP lite (CD version)
 
ThunderLounge said:
If I needed to buy one today, yes. In fact it wouldn't be the entry level either, and I wouldn't think twice about it. Even though the C2D most likely will offer something better (besides the C2D increase), the current line isn't ancient by any means, and will definitely provide the power needed for what my usage would be. Sure I would see an increase in performance with some of the video work, and probably the photo and graphic work as well, but the current one will still do what it needs to do, and do it well.

There's always going to be something better on the horizon, no matter when you buy. The simple question is how far out is it. With the (hopefully) impending release of an update, if you can wait a bit then cool. If not, the current line isn't so far behind that it would be like running a G4 with 256k of RAM.

While unfortunate, none of us know how long the wait will be. It could be a few days, a few weeks, or a horrid few months.
Back then, I was using 1.33 Ghz PB G4. Still I'd wait a bit if 64 Bit chips were released and being shipped by other companies back then.

This is not something better on the horizon issue. The thing has introduced, released, and shipped by other companies.

Yes, if you don't have any extra/or old computer and you need a laptop now, you'd buy anything!
But most people are upgrading from their old pcs/macs/laptops/or desktops.
 
maverick808 said:
Now, if we max out the Sony with a 2.33GHz C2D we get $2079.99.
Thank You Maverick for this good comparison.
It´s good to know if our wish for a C2D MBP is real or wishful thinking.

I wouldn´t buy a Sony eihter.

I´m ready to pay a premium price for an Apple MBP for different reasons:
I love to work with Apples PB. It´s well designed. It´s help to save time. OS X is a very nice system. It can´t compared to windows.
On the other hand. I bought a PB G4 last September. It was the same situation. Now I´m on the limit if I use it at work. Thats why I want and nearly have to get a new one. But I can´t get every year a new Apple Laptop. So its important that this machine is state of the art today.
Let me conclude:
Please Steve: pull the trigger.
 
I am very impatient.

I have a powermac G5 so don't really need a new computer but i would like the portability, intel (so i can put windows for all those*annoying*programs that haven't worked out mac is better), iSight, and Front Row.

but i find my self checking this thread every hour for the little bit of news, then get excited from small news like shipping times and end up posting many pointless posts like this..

im sorry i just can't help it... i think im turning into a fanboy...

Come on apple it has to be 10/10/06!!
 
timmillwood said:
i think im turning into a fanboy...

Come on apple it has to be 10/10/06!!


I hear ya! I am spending waaaay too much time looking for that kernal of hope. I just keep wondering why Apple won't even address the C2D issue?
 
Im bored now. Refreshing this thread every minute every day is unhealthy....almost 4 weeks straight. Whenever Apple decided to get off their asses and release the MBP, i'll find out from every major tech news site and order it....if the release is good.

Yet i have a feeling i'd be laughing at myself for waiting for a boring update. I'm secretly hoping this wait will be worth it but my gut instincts tell me i'll be like "meh" when it happens.

Until then i'm signing off and enjoying my almighty G4 and Dell display for the time being. Infact 10.4.8 seems to have made it more 'responsive'
 
maverick808 said:
Ach, I already replied to this. Deputy-Dawg made a mistake, my screenshots clearly show that I *DID* pick 100GB drive, DVD burner, 1GB RAM on 1 memory stick. I *DID* pick the non-integrated video, NVidia 7600, and I *DID* pick wireless 802.11 AND Bluetooth. I also picked the built-in USB camera.

Please, I don't want to get into doing comparison after comparison. It's simply an undeniable fact that the MBP is underpowered and overpriced when compared to the majority of PC laptops out there TODAY. As Gurutech points out, it was a FANTASTIC bargain 9 months ago... and I bought one then. I just don't think it's a fair price to pay for it today.

I will concede the HD, but to do so you then have to select the so called standard battery option to meet your price. Most reviewers find that they can only get about 1.5 hours life on the standard battery. To get battery life that is approximately the same as the MBP you have to purchase the extended life battery for an additional $100. So the long and the short of it you have either accept much less mass storage or a much shorter battery life to save the $100.

As for using Windows XP Home Edition over the Pro version to save another $79 is to my mind accepting a worse OS over one which is simply worse (trust me XP Pro is bad). And as for the nickel and dime software short fall I will simply bow out of that arguement.

Having said all that, I would agree that Apple shoud release a machine with comparable processor capabilities but I am not prepare to excoriate them for missing introductions by a few weeks or even a month or so. If Apple chooses not to compete that would be another story. But I just don't understand the venom produced by not being there on the same day with an announcement.

Finally, although Sony has a 2.33 Ghz machine in their catalog has anyone seen one yet. I know that I have not been able to find one to look at here in NW Arkansas.
 
How many pages til MeromMPBs?

Our photokina thread easily broke 100 pages, which is something of a rarity on MacRumors. I have to wonder how many pages we'll get to on this thread before we can start talking about how much we're enjoying our new laptops?
:mad: :mad: :mad:


Cheers
 
Why I will wait

I am forced to use Windows XP in my business. It drives me nuts with hanging up, forced quits, options I need to use seven dialog boxes down etc. And the lovely necessity of updating my anti-virus software once or twice a day.

My G5 IMac at home suffers from none of these. It is reliable and elegant. I do not replace my laptop often as it is a secondary business machine for me, but I cannot wait to throw my current Dell in the river and use a Mac with Parallells or Boot Camp when I must use windows.

So if it costs me a few bucks more, amortized over 3-5 years, what do I care? How much is your aggravation worth?

You can get there in a Chevy Aveo--but I'd rather not!

Phil
 
maverick808 said:
I've quickly rechecked and I was right. I selected the built in camera, the GeForce 7600, wireless LAN AND Bluetooth, Intel *C2D* 2GHz, 1GB RAM on a single RAM stick, 100GB hard disk and DVD burner. The price is definitely $1529.99.

I hardly see a difference between XP Home and Pro which is why I selected Home. The average user will be happy with Home. Furthermore, even if you DO go ahead and pick XP Pro, it's only another $80 and the final price is still well below the MBP.

Yet I would pay several thousand dollars just for Mac OS X
 
The graphics in the macbook pro , some people want updating. Can i sneak a question do the current cards support hardware T&L?
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.