poppe said:
(so obviously this guy knows nothing!).
And that right there tells you all you need to know.
poppe said:
What I found odd however is that this guy (the one at the apple store) is telling people to not by MBP's at this moment becuase he keeps hearing rumors that Apple is going back to PPC; or something to that effect.
I just laughed, but I'm curious has there been any rumors of such I thing?
No, Apple is done with PPC. PPC as an architecture is at the end of the road and its life cycle is done, over, retired. PPC was a joint venture between Apple, IBM, Motorola and others. IBM was left holding the major piece of the pie and has essentially ended development of the PPC architecture. Apple considered various options for the next line of CPUs to include in their systems and Intel won them over. Many industry experts predicted that AMD would win out, but in the end, I don't think AMD could make the same guarantees for production quantities and pricing that Intel could. After all, they're a lot smaller company even though they have done an incredible job at competing.
poppe said:
I thought I once heard people saying of Apple perhaps taking on the new Cell processors that IBM has designed for the PS3.
I've heard many such rumors and not just regarding Apple. Sony's hype machine and their loyal following of sheep-like zombies can run the BS like no one else. The reality of it is, the Cell processor isn't all that special. Compared to the current multi-core Intel chips or the tri-core chip used in the XBOX360, it's just another CPU architecture with similar performance per cost per watt. There's nothing radially different about Cell from any other current CPU architecture. Cell is more compact and in some ways less functional with the intent of using more cores (or cells) within a CPU structure. Theoretically this provides more flexibility to divide up various tasks. You can bet that PS3 is going to be noticeably more powerful than the XBOX 360, but it will have little to do with Cell itself, but rather just the general evolution of the industry... It's hitting the market with overall newer technology almost a year later and at a higher price with a new generation GPU, more RAM and much more data storage via Blu-Ray.
poppe said:
I truly couldn't see why they would ditch intel for the simple fact of being able to run windows. This i feel is bringing alot of people over to the Mac side.
And you are right. The move to the x86 architecture (not necessarily Intel) was really the only move Apple had. Or at least the only real intelligent move they could make. Not only did it gain them the ability to somewhat unofficially support Windows, but also opened up an entire world of software developers and code base already optimized for the x86 architecture. This was a no-brianer. As time goes on and contracts run their course, it's very possible that Apple could shift from Intel, perhaps to AMD if conditions were right. However there's no way they will shift away from the x86 platform unless the entire PC industry makes the same move. It would be suicide for them. And they're definitely not going anywhere now, not after investing all the time and money into getting converted to the x86 platform.
poppe said:
Well I don't know exactly why i'm telling you all this. Perhaps its just I felt very confused why an Apple employee would be telling people such a thing.
Face it, you're just bored like me and tired and have nothing better to do. You can't sleep because this thread beckons to you every waking moment and you just know that the MBP update is going to happen tomorrow. And if not tomorrow, it will be next Tuesday, and if not then, probably wednesday, or perhaps the following tuesday... You see, you now belong to us as a collective. You have been assimilated by the great Steve Jobs MBP Mind-F**(n)K Experiment.