First, it was actually 640k
Does it require ANY imagination whatsoever to determine that hiring people based on meaningless attributes like skin color or gender will result in people who are MORE qualified?
Given that Apple has introduced ProRes videorecording in their iPhones (Pro), the need to be able to efficiently handle the format now extends throughout their product stack down to the phones themselves.
Imo the M2 will be consistent with the M1, ie. redesigned cores, but still 4 performance and 4 efficiency. This will maintain the power limit that exist on fanless form factors like Macbook Air and iPads.
that's the most reason big core and small core .not all have 4k screen or 8k ?? in f1 , car is optimise oil consumption to max. and not all other chip like ram covert those 5 nm thing.
That's why Apple is actually saying that for most people, the iPad is already good enough. You are correct. For basic stuff, even the A10 on the iPhone 7 is good enough. The A10 can already play 4K videos (used in the Apple TV 4K 1st gen). If you only use your computer to watch cat videos on youtube, you probably don't eve need a Mac. The basic iPad is more than enough. And Apple's decision to go with nVME starting with the iPhone 6s onward is the best bet they did as it ensure storage speed on their portables to not be a bottleneck.
Completely agree. If power usage isn't an issue and you want a nice chunky rendering / gaming rig then the intel is a no brainer. AMD were terrible 20 years ago (well cheap but ran so hot!) and now offer fantastic chips, my M1 Max MBP is being delivered soon as well and will be my main work horse, having genuine choice is wonderful.
Yeah you're ignoring reality in order to try to turn the question around and make yourself seem smart. That's enough.
I've already answered your question, and you refuse to accept the answer. You cannot hire people based on unrelated characteristics such as gender or race or sexual identity and have that magically translate to hiring the most qualified people. That's simply fantasy. Repeating HOW DO YOU KNOW over and over is not argument. You take common sense, and say HOW DO YOU KNOW ITS COMMON SENSE. That isn't a position, or standpoint to take in discussion.
The meta verse will eventually require computing power enough to emulate at least the viewable portion of our universe from a first person pov as good as reality.
So this just sounds like a long way of admitting you just want to believe that they're unqualified, you actually have no basis for that statement.
You already have the definitive proof that they are less than qualified. You refuse to see it, because you want to continue playing this part where you pretend you don't have this information, and keep asking for it over and over in a one way blind fashion that makes it seem like you're coming out on top of the conversation.
I think you should either put up or shut up.
You keep repeating the same thing over and over. I already pointed out how this is not a strategy for argument. You can't keep ignoring what has been given to you, and saying NO you need to answer my question. This is a very common strategy for people who aren't able to win arguments with information, instead they keep repeating the same thing and pretending their questions haven't been addressed.
You can get a slightly lower spec model with 24 GPU cores and still get 64GB RAM. In the US it’ll save you $200.
