But to what end?Its a portable device. For some people (me included) thinner and lighter is better.
Yeah, but it gets 4-5 hours battery life. It's the worst on the market for it.
These agnosts have to be removed as soon as possible - before its too late.From the desk of Tim Cook:
"Apple is getting out of the laptop business......"
The non-touch model has nearly half the resolution of the retina MacBook Pro though and from the benchmarks i've seen, still doesn't get double digit battery life.
I love it. It's the sort of rumors that start the good 'ol "should I switch now or wait for the OLED macbook pro" rumors!
Ahh I see. Thank you.Pretty sure you missed the point. That as soon as an Apple product comes out, all the rumors of what will be in the next one start popping up. As if to say - you don't like this one? Just wait until you see what's coming next...
Aaaaah how about 4 yearsI will look forward to the update in 3 years.
But to what end?
Thin is not supposed to be the primary objective of the Pro. People who want the thinnest laptop get the MacBook, people who want a portable workstation get a Pro. I absolutely want thin, but thin should come after meeting specific performance targets.
As will the prices I suspectPrediction: MacBook Pros in the future will be magical.
Did Tim Cook say that? If he did he's off to a fine start...From the desk of Tim Cook:
"Apple is getting out of the laptop business......"
Let's me guess,, until Apple who have no amoled experience DO IT RIGHT !! Because Samsung, the world's premier amoled OEM don't really know what they are doing eh? Have I missed owt?
Yeah. Those pesky infinite blacks and their stupid photon absorbtions. WTF.
Black is black. Crushed black is either a bad display or bad calibration.