Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Does anyone seriously need their entire multi gigabyte music collection on the go at all times?

Most people tend to listen to a pretty narrow selection during any period ie. this particular artist you like, maybe flipping to another genre for a bit of a break. Who has the time to listen to 64gbs of mp3's on the go, and dont you still just skip loads over?

I can see the ultra convenience of never having to bother, and it looking cool flicking through gigs of media, but I cant see why you couldnt just copy select playlists.

I have about 6 Gigs in my entire music library. That includes all the best albums of Led Zeppelin, Pink Floyd, Megadeth, Metallica, Iron Maiden and the entire Guns N' Roses discography, pre-1993.

32 GB is only worth it if you're using flac files.
 
It's a strange thing Google is doing, marrying one hardware company while having flings with the others. Careful, Google - women get jealous.

Wonder how Motorola Droid sales will do now that people know the Nexus One (*puke* that name sucks) will be on Verizon in the spring?

Probably not well.

Google made out with Motorola and then punched it in the face. Interesting strategy. Sometimes I really don't think Google knows what it's doing outside the search business.

This is what they will do for Motorola...

http://digital.venturebeat.com/2010/01/05/nexus-two/

Google’s VP of Product Management Mario Queiroz said today.

“We could very well do a Nexus Two with Motorola,” he said. “We’re working as quickly as possible.”

To me it looks like they are keeping a close relationship with both HTC and Motorola.
 
Does anyone seriously need their entire multi gigabyte music collection on the go at all times?

Most people tend to listen to a pretty narrow selection during any period ie. this particular artist you like, maybe flipping to another genre for a bit of a break. Who has the time to listen to 64gbs of mp3's on the go, and dont you still just skip loads over?

I can see the ultra convenience of never having to bother, and it looking cool flicking through gigs of media, but I cant see why you couldnt just copy select playlists.

I understand your reasoning here and I agree with you. For the most part is it just a convenience factor for me. When I add new music to Itunes I don't have to worry about putting into the folder that syncs with my iPhone and worry about having to take other songs off in order to accommodate the space i need. In no way do I need all 3200 songs on my phone at all times, but it is nice being able to go through my library and if i have a craving for something different, i know it will be there.
 
Fixed your post. And you're wrong about lousy and bad too. A lot of people enjoy the Android UI and like the fact that you can have widgets on the home screen. This is something missing from the iPhone. Why have to unlock it and open up apps like Calendar, Mail or Weather to get info that could be easily summarized on the locked home screen ?

Also, why do you need to Jailbreak to change the black background behind the icons ? You'd think in 2010, Apple would've figured out how to make a non-confusing UI to set the background to another color or to a picture from your library...

the lack of objectivity and middle ground on this site are nothing short of extraordinary.

You either have devout, quasi-religious Apple fans, or MS zealot trolls. The amount of armchair UI experts alone is staggering. I had no idea there were so many people in this field, and they're all on this site!
 
Who of Apple said that and when? And how is that "funny"?
It is quite obvious that they simply didn't want to release a CDMA iPhone so far for political reasons. It has nothing to do with being hard or oh so expensive. You said it yourself, everyone else can built two versions quite easily. Even a company like Palm that is a bit short on cash.

I was referring to all of the people around here that say Apple will never do a CDMA version. I think they have to when they realize that half the US market is CDMA. That is taking yourself out of the game when your competition is hitting you at every angle.
 
Does anyone seriously need their entire multi gigabyte music collection on the go at all times?

Most people tend to listen to a pretty narrow selection during any period ie. this particular artist you like, maybe flipping to another genre for a bit of a break. Who has the time to listen to 64gbs of mp3's on the go, and dont you still just skip loads over?

I can see the ultra convenience of never having to bother, and it looking cool flicking through gigs of media, but I cant see why you couldnt just copy select playlists.

Yes, when the iPhone is synced with the iTune Library on PC it copies all songs over.
 
the lack of objectivity and middle ground on this site are nothing short of extraordinary.

You either have devout, quasi-religious Apple fans, or MS zealot trolls. The amount of armchair UI experts alone is staggering. I had no idea there were so many people in this field, and they're all on this site!
As to the UI, beauty, as they say, is in the eye of the beholder. In other words, it doesn't take an expert to see that something looks too cluttered, or klugey, or stuttery, or whatever. I can't speak to the usability of the Nexus One, but I (or anyone else) does have the right to comment on aesthetics.

And maybe I'm being elitist, but I do think Mac users, especially hard core ones such as are found here, are more likely to notice or appreciate UI details; that's one of the draws of Mac OSes for many, and it's those details that can elevate software from "it gets the job done" to a seamless and exceptional user experience.
 
You do understand iTunes gives you more finer grained control than that. You can sync only some parts of your library to your phone, no need to sync all of it.

Do you know that iPhone is a mobile device. It travels with you to far away places. So why would you leave some of your songs at home?
 
Do you know that iPhone is a mobile device. It travels with you to far away places. So why would you leave some of your songs at home?

Because my 6 GB library contains 2.8 days of music. A 32 GB library preserving the same ratio would be over 2 weeks.

So unless I'm off for more than a week and I listen to my iPod 24/7 (impossible what with that thing called sleep), then maybe you'd have a point.

I don't bring my entire closet with me on vacation, I don't see why I'd need all my media either. Am I on vacation to listen to/watch media or to you know, be on vacation ?
 
Because my 6 GB library contains 2.8 days of music. A 32 GB library preserving the same ratio would be over 2 weeks.

So unless I'm off for more than a week and I listen to my iPod 24/7 (impossible what with that thing called sleep), then maybe you'd have a point.

I take it all of your music is in Lossless? Most of mine is and I have about 27 Gigs of music and only is about 9 days
 
Because my 6 GB library contains 2.8 days of music. A 32 GB library preserving the same ratio would be over 2 weeks.

So unless I'm off for more than a week and I listen to my iPod 24/7 (impossible what with that thing called sleep), then maybe you'd have a point.

I don't bring my entire closet with me on vacation, I don't see why I'd need all my media either. Am I on vacation to listen to/watch media or to you know, be on vacation ?

I love having full access to my music wherever I am (i use simplifymedia and stream what I can't fit) - never know what I'll want to listen to (whether on vacation or not).
 
And that matters how?

It matters because the implication of compatibility is that the thing with which something is claimed to be compatible actually exists.

Anyone who gets one counting on 32GB of storage without first making sure they can actually find a 32GB MicroSD card to purchase is extremely unintelligent.

Ah, so the consumer who buys a Nexus One, thinking he can get 32GB of storage on it because Google says it's compatible with 32GB SD cards, is an idiot?

That sounds like blaming the customer to the extreme.

I smell lawsuit.
 
This is what they will do for Motorola...

http://digital.venturebeat.com/2010/01/05/nexus-two/

Google’s VP of Product Management Mario Queiroz said today.

“We could very well do a Nexus Two with Motorola,” he said. “We’re working as quickly as possible.”

To me it looks like they are keeping a close relationship with both HTC and Motorola.

They're basically juggling them and in the long run, neither vendor is gonna be happy.

After they do the Nexus 2, it's HTC's turn to complain.

Typically the flagship product is linked to its vendor and stays on the market for about a year. With Android it's linked to the OS revision and has been jumping from vendor to vendor every two months.
 
As to the UI, beauty, as they say, is in the eye of the beholder. In other words, it doesn't take an expert to see that something looks too cluttered, or klugey, or stuttery, or whatever. I can't speak to the usability of the Nexus One, but I (or anyone else) does have the right to comment on aesthetics.

And maybe I'm being elitist, but I do think Mac users, especially hard core ones such as are found here, are more likely to notice or appreciate UI details; that's one of the draws of Mac OSes for many, and it's those details that can elevate software from "it gets the job done" to a seamless and exceptional user experience.

The thing is that the UI's aren't all that dissimilar, to the point where to call Android cluttered is to call iPhone cluttered. Having used both, Android 2.0 for the last 2 months and iPhone OS (on iPT) for the last year, I feel a bit more qualified to say that than the vast majority of people in this thread who have looked at screenshots on the web of Android, or played with it in the store for 5 minutes.

The Android OS is an exceptional user experience, especially when compared to Blackberry or Windows Mobile. I wouldn't say it is better than the iPhone OS, but it is very, very close.
 
Ah, so the consumer who buys a Nexus One, thinking he can get 32GB of storage on it because Google says it's compatible with 32GB SD cards, is an idiot?

That sounds like blaming the customer to the extreme.

I smell lawsuit.

Yeah, the consumer who buys a Nexus One thinking they can walk right out and get one today just because Google says it's capable is an idiot. Sorry. When did a consumer's inability to read and comprehend English entitle them to a lawsuit?

If it said it "32GB of storage, available today" that would be a problem, obviously.
 
They're basically juggling them and in the long run, neither vendor is gonna be happy.

So basically Google will be using these guys like Apple uses Foxconn? Yeah, I can't see HTC or Motorola feeling great about that for long.

When did a consumer's inability to read and comprehend English entitle them to a lawsuit?

So when the consumer reads (and comprehends) that the Nexus is compatible with 32GB SD cards, it's his responsibility to do research to determine whether there even is such a thing??? :rolleyes:
 
That's because it is. Two years later and all the competition can do is churn out an iPhone clone with comparable specs but lousy-ass software and bad UIs. Doesn't make for much "competiiton", but it sure makes for fun headlines every six months or so.


Oh it's enough already. You make me feel ashamed to call myself an Apple fanboy. It's always "Apple fabulous - everything else total crap" with you. That's not how the world works.
The Nexus might not be the best thing since sliced bread and for sure it's not oh so groundbreaking and innovative, but it's a decent piece of hardware AND software and does the job quite nicely for a lot of people I guess. The iPhone still has its merits, and yes it was a game-changer and it's great la la la, but that doesn't make the Nexus BAD.

Be happy that other people out there give Apple a bit of an extra push to improve their devices or at least make them a little cheaper. And no, Apple is not inherently immune to competition for all times.

I'll be happy for sure if Apple releases THEIR free nav app. They wouldn't do that without Google pushing them. Now they don't really have a choice. (I assume that they bought this mapping company for a reason)
 
So basically Google will be using these guys like Apple uses Foxconn? Yeah, I can't see HTC or Motorola feeling great about that for long.



So when the consumer reads (and comprehends) that the Nexus is compatible with 32GB SD cards, it's his responsibility to do research to determine whether there even is such a thing??? :rolleyes:

Uh, yeah. This isn't the first time a piece of technology is capable of something not yet offered. Somehow those failed to turn up lawsuits as well.

Does the Nexus say it includes 32GB? No. It is capable of accepting 32GB MicroSD cards. What's so hard about understanding that?

There are computers currently out that accept DIMMs larger than are what's currently available. Wow, the lawsuits are a flyin'!!
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.