Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Apple says Android copied iOS in its entirety.
It always vaguely amuses me when someone comments about "Android originally copying Apple," in such a way as to doubt that it actually happened that way. My first thought when I see such comments is to wonder just how young the poster must be... because surely if they were at least a teenager in 2007, they would very clearly remember the changes that took place after Steve showed off that first iPhone, even if they somehow never watched the actual keynote speech. I mean, those of us who can comfortably call ourselves "old farts" and remember these events lived through a literal revolution in interface design! Sure, some may argue that there were isolated elements of the iPhone in a few random places that Apple (ahem) must have copied... and maybe there's some small element of truth to that. But Apple put those elements together to come up with something genuinely new and unique... and the resulting product (the iPhone) ultimately changed how absolutely everybody interacts with their devices and with each other. How could anyone forget such a thing, even almost two decades later?

If, for some reason, you genuinely don't know what I'm referring to... please, just do a quick google image search for "android before and after iphone." I mean, if I was looking at those image results for the very first time, I suppose I'd be a bit shocked and confused, too, and I might even go looking for further evidence of Android's true origins... but honestly, that evidence really is out there for all to see, and it's not at all difficult to find.

So sure: Apple has copied Xerox, Microsoft, Google and probably quite a few others over the years. But Microsoft really did copy the Mac, lock-stock-and-barrel, and Google really did copy the iPhone, lock-stock-and-barrel. And Apple's ideas -- which so many others have quickly copied -- really have changed the world. This is not a speculative discussion; it's recorded history.
 
What does that even mean
Copy once, copy again for something that happened about two decades ago
You understand that is nearly 20 years ago
it’s a bit odd to keep going that far back

Apple couldn’t implement these new features originally as most of their consumers wouldn’t accept it because some don’t like change because of their demographic
It’s a bit odd to stay Apple copied when google when the bruh-haha of all copying happened in 2008.
 
So do Apple fans on forums.
It goes both ways.
Absolutely. I embrace both companies 'copying' from each other - we benefit from the added features, options, etc. But the trillion dollar companies and their C-Suit goons shouldn't be whining about it publicly when they all do the same thing in varying degrees, unless there is an actual copyright infringement and it's going to court.
 
Last edited:
It’s a bit odd to stay Apple copied when google when the bruh-haha of all copying happened in 2008.
Again going back nearly (20 years)
Google in all intents and purposes have to implement these new software features first because there customers will accept it
Unlike apple’s as they have a certain demographic that won’t accept new things
That’s why google’s software has gotten better as time has went on in certain aspects
 
It always vaguely amuses me when someone comments about "Android originally copying Apple," in such a way as to doubt that it actually happened that way. My first thought when I see such comments is to wonder just how young the poster must be... because surely if they were at least a teenager in 2007, they would very clearly remember the changes that took place after Steve showed off that first iPhone, even if they somehow never watched the actual keynote speech. I mean, those of us who can comfortably call ourselves "old farts" and remember these events lived through a literal revolution in interface design! Sure, some may argue that there were isolated elements of the iPhone in a few random places that Apple (ahem) must have copied... and maybe there's some small element of truth to that. But Apple put those elements together to come up with something genuinely new and unique... and the resulting product (the iPhone) ultimately changed how absolutely everybody interacts with their devices and with each other. How could anyone forget such a thing, even almost two decades later?

If, for some reason, you genuinely don't know what I'm referring to... please, just do a quick google image search for "android before and after iphone." I mean, if I was looking at those image results for the very first time, I suppose I'd be a bit shocked and confused, too, and I might even go looking for further evidence of Android's true origins... but honestly, that evidence really is out there for all to see, and it's not at all difficult to find.

So sure: Apple has copied Xerox, Microsoft, Google and probably quite a few others over the years. But Microsoft really did copy the Mac, lock-stock-and-barrel, and Google really did copy the iPhone, lock-stock-and-barrel. And Apple's ideas -- which so many others have quickly copied -- really have changed the world. This is not a speculative discussion; it's recorded history.
Yes and that is one of the problems that apple have because of a certain demographic that is why in some instances they are to slow to push boundaries software wise because of a certain demographic
 
What does that even mean
Pretty much everything.
Security my sisters android device is secure never had any issues
Again she’s never had an issue with privacy using android
Her devices over the years have actually held up better than people’s iPhones over the same time period in how long she keeps her devices
So I don’t think google are jealous
As a Digital Forensics Examiner, I can definitely say that Android is not secure. That does not mean that people do not have issues with Android because 99.9999% of Android users only use the devices to make and receive phone calls. There is new malware running around for Android that is bad enough that the FBI has issued a warning. Google is completely jealous because they are not trusted and cannot produce a good product. The only good product that Google sells is from a company they bought and the product was built by ex-Apple employees, Nest.
 
As a Digital Forensics Examiner, I can definitely say that Android is not secure. That does not mean that people do not have issues with Android because 99.9999% of Android users only use the devices to make and receive phone calls. There is new malware running around for Android that is bad enough that the FBI has issued a warning. Google is completely jealous because they are not trusted and cannot produce a good product. The only good product that Google sells is from a company they bought and the product was built by ex-Apple employees, Nest.
If you do something dodgy on your android device then you are correct it will probably not be secure.
However you are incorrect to say that there is no good android devices out there or google products because that is not true.
In some instances android is actually are more innovative OS than iOS because of apple’s demographic in their customer base
 
how is that Find My Network going Google? Also has Google seen what their own phone looks like?
 
how is that Find My Network going Google? Also has Google seen what their own phone looks like?
Google has a find my feature and it actually works pretty well as I currently use it for my father’s device and there is no issue.

There is nothing wrong with how google’s phones look
Some say the iPhone looks awful compared with some android devices but it ultimately comes down to personal opinion
 
If, for some reason, you genuinely don't know what I'm referring to... please, just do a quick google image search for "android before and after iphone."

Or even just phones before and after...

F6aDJPlXgAAs_t7
 
If you do something dodgy on your android device then you are correct it will probably not be secure.
However you are incorrect to say that there is no good android devices out there or google products because that is not true.
In some instances android is actually are more innovative OS than iOS because of apple’s demographic in their customer base
I have not seen anything innovative in years on Android.
 
  • Love
Reactions: HazeAndHahmahneez
Until now Android has offered more platform freedom, flexibility and functionality (with associated risks), while Apple were offering a really polished walled garden (with their own set of sometimes bizarre rules and restrictions). Android is still behind on the design and eye candy, while Apple lag behind with AI deployment, split screen functionality for iPhones, etc. Interesting times, basically. 😉
If I were to purchase an Android device, I would require that Java is removed from the device. 😏
 
  • Wow
Reactions: HazeAndHahmahneez
Best Joke ever, unless you include the amount of malware available for Android, then the malware authors have been very innovative!
What malware my family who use android
Have never had a virus or gotten malware
So unless your dodgy then you will be alright
 
Google copied the entire look and feel of iOS in 2008-2009, they are one to make fun of apple. Having said that if by you are bored of the iPhone and envious of android, sell you’re iPhone and go Samsung.
Google purchased Android after Eric Schmitt saw what Apple was doing with the iPhone to cobble together a smartphone to compete with Apple. They released Android for smartphones in 2008. Originally Android was an interface software for digital cameras.
 
  • Wow
Reactions: HazeAndHahmahneez
Google purchased Android after Eric Schmitt saw what Apple was doing with the iPhone to cobble together a smartphone to compete with Apple. They released Android for smartphones in 2008. Originally Android was an interface software for digital cameras.
2008 called they want to know if your going back there anytime soon 😂

On a side note google can implement things into android before apple because apple has a certain demographic that won’t accept new things
 
As someone who switched to Apple with an iPhone 14 Pro after 13yrs of Droid, Nexus, and Pixel devices: this is such a room-temp-IQ-take from Google.

If people cared about who was first, Android would dominate in the US. Google markets their features so poorly.

Google has catching up to do in some areas, and Apple has catching up to do in some areas.
Android was developed for digital cameras until Google purchased Android and had the software updated for smartphones. Google is so far behind, they may never catch up.
 
2008 called they want to know if your going back there anytime soon 😂

On a side note google can implement things into android before apple because apple has a certain demographic that won’t accept new things
Ah, no. Google has been known to try things, not implement them well and then drop them. Android has a demographic where people do not spend money and attempts to download applications for free instead of purchasing them.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.