I'm just sayin'. Some people think Apple did everything first.
What's more important is who does it right.
I'm just sayin'. Some people think Apple did everything first.
Really? Have you seen a different video?
By the way, can you show where I have said that Android has a better notification system than iOS, in the same place that you have seen that they ripped off completely iOS?
What's more important is who does it right.
Me: "Majel, where can I go for lunch?"
Majel: "There are 12 restaurants nearby. I have sorted them by distance for you. However, Joe's Burger Shack is offering a 50% off promotion. Would you like to hear more?"
Ok, I misunderstood your post, but I love that video because Android fans will argue the truth when it's right there in front of them, presented by Google itself.
What else did Android copy? Tell me.
'I have no opinion on the following:
Hugo Barra, when asked about copying iOS:
"When given detail about them and asked whether he would say that any elements in the latest version of Android, such as the two-line preview of emails in the Gmail app (found in Apple's iPhone email program since 2007), or the "quick response" buttons at the bottom of the email app (almost identical in order and purpose to those in Apple's iPhone email program), or the provision of a shortcut to the camera from the phone's lock screen (first seen in Windows Phone 7 in October 2010 iOS 5 previews in June), or the extra features added to the Notifications bar in Android were copying iOS, he responded: "I'm not going to get into this.""
i find it interesting that Android has something Siri like for years and Apple replicates it and adds a few upgrades and it is now a miraculous invention LOL
like the pull down task bar Android has had since 1.0
to each his own. i own an iPhone 2,3G,3Gs, and 4 and many Androids and they both have their good and bad sides.
Apple didnt invent the smartphone and neither did Android but they are both great devices today.
i dont care which one i am using they can both keep Siri. i dont like my phone talking back to me![]()
What truth?
'
Still states nothing on what Android copied from iOS. Gmail is an App, it's not the OS itself.
The video only serves to drive a few points home.
a) One could argue that Google had better notifications first from that video, and I wouldn't disagree.
b) One could argue that Google thought imitating a Blackberry was the way to go, until they saw how iOS was doing and completely revamped... and I wouldn't disagree.
For every person who says, "There's only so many ways to make the Android OS look and act," or, "There are only so many ways to make a tablet," my only rebuttal is: Where were they before Apple did it?
Apple apparently had something very close to that feature in early iPhones despite the fact that it wasn't available to users without jail-breaking. Seems more likely to me that the concept found its way into Android via Eric Schmidt's proximity to Apple at that time.
In that light, let's see the first Google phone, I believe November 2007:
Looks like the a a nightmare a Blackberry would have.
I wonder what happened to that design?
^^^Android came out in 2008. The First Google Phone was the G1.
I believe they had a touchscreen only device in 2007 though.
You're forgetting the touch only prototype from the same date
HTC, Motorla and Samsung have models like that TODAY.
Stop spreading misinformation please. Android is not hardware, its software. That picture is of a phone, with buttons, with the Android OS installed on it. How does that indicate that they first copied Blackberry, and then switched to copying Apple? If you do some analytical thinking, you'll see that Android had docked software buttons, indicating that Android was meant to be an OS on phones with no physical buttons.Reading is comprehension. I can't help you with that.
----------
In that light, let's see the first Google phone, I believe November 2007:
Image
Looks like the a a nightmare a Blackberry would have.
I wonder what happened to that design?
To be honest, that's a little silly
The jump from a wooden carriage drawn by horses to the motorcar, is a bit of a larger leap from one type of voice recognition to another type of voice recognition.
Stop spreading misinformation please. Android is not hardware, its software. That picture is of a phone, with buttons, with the Android OS installed on it. How does that indicate that they first copied Blackberry, and then switched to copying Apple? If you do some analytical thinking, you'll see that Android had docked software buttons, indicating that Android was meant to be an OS on phones with no physical buttons.
Ok. However your believes are of no concern. The link I posted was of their prototype, which is also in the youtube video. If you have a link to a touchscreen only in 2007 post it.
Did it come out b4 or after the first iPhone?
Apple didn't have anything. It was a 3rd party app from Cydia
I was not alluding anything in the picture about android. Did I mention android? Reading is comprehension.
Came at the same time that the one in the picture you have posted. You are the one saying that the first device looked like that and this is false, they looked like that and touch only.
What my link shows is that the concept pre-dated Google's implementation in Android (regardless of who created it.)
First I said prototype, second you admit the same: "they looked like that and touch"