Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
You mock Google, but Apple is still releasing a square watch in 2022.
We WANT a square watch. There is no reason being circular. It’s a screen to display information, not an actual mechanical watch with cogwheels and gears that need to move in circular motion. It’s like wanting to buy a circular phone, tablet or tv. Makes no sense escpecialky on a screen this small. Why lose screen real estate so it can resemble something that it isn’t anyway?
 
Probably left it behind to get rid of it. Looks awful.
Does it though? It actually looks more like a watch than the Apple Watch does IMO. it’s a bit too thick for my liking but I honestly can’t see how you’d claim it looks awful without also including the Apple Watch in that claim.
 
Android users have indeed been waiting for a watch that can match the capabilities of Apple Watch.

I'be been through 3 Apple watches before going back over to Android. I used them all for the same 3 things: Time, Fitness and paying for stuff. Very rarely did I use one without my iPhone being around which made the data connection rather pointless. The lack of a goldrush for apps indicates that outside of that core functionality nobody is adding anything to theirs either. The ECG and such are clever ideas but IRL a tad pointless. I don't recall Linford Christie, Carl Lewis or Roger Bannister needing to check their heartrate after a run.

Which brings me to my question: beyond the core functionality of time, fitness and pay what capabilities are we not getting?
 
We WANT a square watch. There is no reason being circular. It’s a screen to display information, not an actual mechanical watch with cogwheels and gears that need to move in circular motion. It’s like wanting to buy a circular phone, tablet or tv. Makes no sense escpecialky on a screen this small. Why lose screen real estate so it can resemble something that it isn’t anyway?
Not quite. All those examples you outlined are 99% rectangular. Watches are often circular. My personal preference would be for a round smart watch (apologies for going against your apparent role as spokesperson for the Apple Watch community) But I could deal with a square watch if it just didn’t look like a small iPhone/computer. Not sure how apple can fix that but I do know that this pixel watch seems to look more “authentic” based on the images. I’ll reserve my full judgment for when I can try one.
 
Does it though? It actually looks more like a watch than the Apple Watch does IMO. it’s a bit too thick for my liking but I honestly can’t see how you’d claim it looks awful without also including the Apple Watch in that claim.
But why does it need to look like a traditional watch when it is anything but? That is for hardware what skeuomorphism was for software
 
But why does it need to look like a traditional watch when it is anything but? That is for hardware what skeuomorphism was for software
For sure it doesn’t have to look like a traditional one but it’d be nice. I think it comes down to personal preference.
 
While neither that hardware design, nor anything Google, is for me, at all, those engulfed in Google’s ecosystem - of which there are way more than are engulfed in Apple’s ecosystem - will likely be pumped to have a Google-first wrist device to add to their arsenal, regardless of hardware aesthetic. They’ll sell enough to make any R&D worth it. And by “enough” I mean “a lot.”

You can make this exact argument for the Pixel phone, yet they sell like 10 of those.
 
  • Like
Reactions: kc9hzn
I'be been through 3 Apple watches before going back over to Android. I used them all for the same 3 things: Time, Fitness and paying for stuff. Very rarely did I use one without my iPhone being around which made the data connection rather pointless. The lack of a goldrush for apps indicates that outside of that core functionality nobody is adding anything to theirs either. The ECG and such are clever ideas but IRL a tad pointless. I don't recall Linford Christie, Carl Lewis or Roger Bannister needing to check their heartrate after a run.

Which brings me to my question: beyond the core functionality of time, fitness and pay what capabilities are we not getting?

You know that an ECG isn’t for checking your heart rate, right?
 
Not quite. All those examples you outlined are 99% rectangular. Watches are often circular. My personal preference would be for a round smart watch (apologies for going against your apparent role as spokesperson for the Apple Watch community) But I could deal with a square watch if it just didn’t look like a small iPhone/computer. Not sure how apple can fix that but I do know that this pixel watch seems to look more “authentic” based on the images. I’ll reserve my full judgment for when I can try one.
Sorry I meant rectangular, English is not my first language - I don’t think Apple Watch can be described as a square shape anyway.
Regardless, of course it comes down to personal preference, but at the same time it makes more sense to have this shape to display more info. It is a small iPhone/computer after all. Why not be shaped for what it is but instead for the preconception of what we all think a watch should look like? At least all of us over a certain age ?? (I have a feeling younger generations - especially in a few years from now - who probably never wore traditional watches will see this rectangular shape as the norm).
Don’t think apple needs to fix not looking like a normal watch, as it ain’t that and it’s sales/popularity and being the gold standard pretty much prove it’s on the right track.
 
I think this looks great. I am not sure why so many people want a super thin watch. This would be an instant buy and swap for my series 7 if it were the 8.
 
Sorry I meant rectangular, English is not my first language - I don’t think Apple Watch can be described as a square shape anyway.
Regardless, of course it comes down to personal preference, but at the same time it makes more sense to have this shape to display more info. It is a small iPhone/computer after all. Why not be shaped for what it is but instead for the preconception of what we all think a watch should look like? At least all of us over a certain age ?? (I have a feeling younger generations - especially in a few years from now - who probably never wore traditional watches will see this rectangular shape as the norm).
Don’t think apple needs to fix not looking like a normal watch, as it ain’t that and it’s sales/popularity and being the gold standard pretty much prove it’s on the right track.

Oh sorry, I wasn't correcting your use of square vs rectangular btw, that'd be a major dick move on my part. My point was that those devices are of the same shape already so no one would be demanding a circular TV.

I can see your point, but yeah I still just find the Apple Watch quite ugly (although mine is the Series 4, so I'll reassess my judgement once I get a Series 8 this year.
 
Fake news! Why didn't the person show an image with the Google logo?
The reason the person claimed it "would not boot" is because the images would expose it's fake.

$1 on Alibaba


Really? Thats funny, because the picture is right here.

Nice thought tho.

Capture.PNG
 
I think the problem is that while we are conditioned to think/link round watches for aesthetic reason, they at the same time negate the positives of a smartwatch. Something as simple as reading a text is messy on a circular watch because either the text is small (think square paragraph inside a circle) or they try to make it zoom every line in middle, vs just having space to read the message at a glance and continue doing whatever you where doing.
 
I’m not sure about every aspect of this design but it’s a reminder that the Apple Watch design is kind of stale at this point, and it’s hardly iconic.
 
Google is well known for leaking their own products to create hype, so I don’t buy that they "accidentally left it somewhere and someone found it". Apple leaks (and some Samsung too) are fun and interesting because they’re accidental, but Google leaks just leave me feeling empty and feel like watching the weird kid of the class pretend to trip on the stairs to get some attention.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 5105973
I'be been through 3 Apple watches before going back over to Android. I used them all for the same 3 things: Time, Fitness and paying for stuff. Very rarely did I use one without my iPhone being around which made the data connection rather pointless. The lack of a goldrush for apps indicates that outside of that core functionality nobody is adding anything to theirs either. The ECG and such are clever ideas but IRL a tad pointless. I don't recall Linford Christie, Carl Lewis or Roger Bannister needing to check their heartrate after a run.

Which brings me to my question: beyond the core functionality of time, fitness and pay what capabilities are we not getting?
I don’t know what other people feel they’re missing, but I’ve been in the Android side of the forum enough to have heard others say they don’t want to give up their Apple watches and that’s why they don’t make a full commitment to Android phones they like. I can’t answer for them but I can tell you what keeps me with Apple Watch.

I really value my Apple Watch for traffic navigation. I’m starting to become aware, thanks to my kids and the awareness their generation has on such matters, that I may have some sort of sensory processing deficits that never got diagnosed.

And I probably won’t bother getting officially diagnosed because my Apple Watch renders my worst one moot.

I’m fine driving a familiar route, but when accidents or road work cause detours or if I’m navigating a fast paced multi lane monstrosity of a road, my senses can get overwhelmed and navigating by sight or audible turn by turn instructions doesn’t help me all that much. I can amp up to a fair amount of anxiety. It’s really stressful for me to the point I got a bit phobic about driving for awhile. It wasn’t such an issue when I was younger, but in the last 25 years traffic has become horrifically dense and congested and aggressive. Even our rural routes are often clogged with backups!

But when I use my Apple Watch in conjunction with Apple Maps, which is really very good in my region, I get the assistance I need to navigate traffic smoothly. The haptic feedback alerts me to prepare for lane changes and turns. It’s just a better, calming experience for me than navigating with the phone alone. I sometimes even use my Apple Watch for the haptic feedback even on routes I am familiar with, if traffic is bad and the motion of all the cars around me is too overwhelming. It just helps me navigate the lane changes and turns.

I also sometimes have issues on foot, in crowded places like malls. I might start using haptic feedback in malls but I don’t know how granular navigation with an Apple Watch is on foot in places like that. If I’m with friends or family it’s not necessary but by myself it would be nice to have this technology crutch.

Now for other users in general, myself and a lot of other women I’ve talked to find Android watches too big and bulky compared to the smaller Apple Watches. So do some men.

I liked my Fitbit and my Samsung watches but I just find my Apple Watch more reliable and comfortable. I like the modular face that lets me know so much information at a glance. I personally like the rectangular shape and how the information is organized on it vs on a round face.
 
Did you really just start your paragraph with “the Apple Watch looks terrible”, and end with “chest strap”?
The difference is that I only wear a chest strap while working out, for that purpose the Apple Watch is totally fine, but for everyday wear it looks really bad.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.